Cited by 357scientometrics and bibliometrics researchEnergy and Environmental SustainabilityPsychology Research and Bibliometrics

Global evolution of research on green energy and environmental technologies: a bibliometric study

Tan, Hao, Li, Jialing, He, Min, Li, Jiayu, Zhi, Dan, Qin, Fanzhi, Zhang, Chen·2021·Journal of Environmental Management

Abstract

To better grasp developments and trends in research on green energy and environmental technologies, the published literatures in the Web of Science Core Collection database from 1998 to 2020 were utilized to reveal critical information and guidance on what has been investigated, and what are the changes in research interests using a bibliometric method. Herein, yearly quantitative distribution of literatures, author contribution and collaboration, productive and influential institutions and countries/territories, co-citation analysis, keywords co-occurrence analysis, and research frontier identification are analyzed via information visualization technology. The results show that the publications on green energy and environmental technologies have grown exponentially, that China, the USA, and Italy are the most active countries, but the global cooperation is not close at present. The research frontier identification results reveal that the categories of energy, wastewater, and performance remain stable, while the trending up and emerging categories of catalyst and CO 2 emission show clear shift over the last decade, indicating that catalytic production of clean energy and value-added chemicals, strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and other related studies to solve the global energy crisis and environmental problems are the research frontiers. This bibliometric study provides unique insights and offers research guidance on green energy and environmental technologies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113382

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tan, H., Li, J., He, M., Li, J., Zhi, D., Qin, F., & Zhang, C.
Affiliations
  • Hunan University (CN)
  • Central South University (CN)
  • Hunan Agricultural University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Li, Jialing
  • Li, Jiayu
Venue
Journal of Environmental Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-11
Volume
297
Pages
113382
ISSN
0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3192951273
Cited by
357
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 88 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 12
FWCI
33.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Key Technologies Research and Development Program (2015BAH22F01)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51809090, 61772186)
  • State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy and Environmental Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
Keywords
clean energy, environmental technology, research trends, research frontiers, international research collaboration, co-citation analysis, keyword co-occurrence, CO2 emission reduction, wastewater treatment, research productivity
MeSH terms
China, Publications, Technology, Bibliometrics, Databases, Factual

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review