The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Can low-carbon city construction reduce carbon intensity?Empirical evidence from low-carbon city pilot policy in China
Abstract
Low-carbon city pilot policy (LCCP) is an innovative initiative for promoting low-carbon transformation and green development in China, which is of great practical significance for realizing China's vision of "double carbon" on schedule. In this study, LCCP implementation is treated as a "quasi-natural experiment," and the spatial difference-in-differences approach is used to quantitatively examine the carbon reduction effects and impact mechanisms of LCCP using panel data of 283 cities in China from 2006 to 2017. The results show that since 2011, LCCP has significantly reduced the carbon intensity of the pilot cities by 0.13%, resulting from the effects of urban environmental governance, industrial structure optimization, and urban innovation level improvement. Meanwhile, there is a significant spatial spillover effect which results in a 0.9% reduction in carbon intensity of neighboring cities. The spatial spillover range of the reduction effect is about 500 km, which decays with distance. Moreover, the carbon reduction effect of the policy is spatially and temporally heterogeneous, and the reduction effect is more significant for resource-based cities, and different for resource-based cities in different development stages. The above findings provide useful policy insights for constructing low-carbon cities under China's "dual carbon goals" and help to realize the win-win path of green development and carbon reduction transition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sepehri, A., & Sarrafzadeh, M.-H. (2018) · Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification · doi:10.1016/j.cep.2018.04.006 · Cited by 1,108
Public policies against global warming: a supply side approach
Sinn, H.-W. (2008) · International Tax and Public Finance · doi:10.1007/s10797-008-9082-z · Cited by 1,014
Environmental Regulations, Air and Water Pollution, and Infant Mortality in India
Greenstone, M., & Hanna, R. (2014) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.104.10.3038 · Cited by 1,013
Yousefi, S. R., Alshamsi, H. A., Amiri, O., & Salavati-Niasari, M. (2021) · Journal of Molecular Liquids · doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2021.116405 · Cited by 665
Sepehri, A., Sarrafzadeh, M.-H., & Avateffazeli, M. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119164 · Cited by 632
Sepehri, A., & Sarrafzadeh, M.-H. (2019) · Applied Water Science · doi:10.1007/s13201-019-1017-6 · Cited by 485
High-speed rail and CO2 emissions in urban China: A spatial difference-in-differences approach
Jia, R., Shao, S., & Yang, L. (2021) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105271 · Cited by 465
Yousefi, S. R., Ghanbari, M., Amiri, O., Marzhoseyni, Z., Mehdizadeh, P., Hajizadeh‐Oghaz, M., & Salavati‐Niasari, M. (2021) · Journal of the American Ceramic Society · doi:10.1111/jace.17696 · Cited by 389
An empirical analysis of the green paradox in China: From the perspective of fiscal decentralization
Zhang, K., Zhang, Z.-Y., & Liang, Q.-M. (2017) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.023 · Cited by 313
Zhu, C., & Lee, C.-C. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121955 · Cited by 286
Cited by
Wang, K., Qiao, Y., Ling, L., Zhao, Z., & Liu, K. (2023) · Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.cjpre.2023.09.001 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Zeng, S., Jin, G., Tan, K., & Liu, X.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-04
- Volume
- 332
- Pages
- 117363
- ISSN
- 0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4318829884
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 74.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Can low-carbon city construction reduce carbon intensity?Empirical evidence from low-carbon city pilot policy in China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117363
- The paper
- Zeng, S., Jin, G., Tan, K., & Liu, X. (2023). Can low-carbon city construction reduce carbon intensity?Empirical evidence from low-carbon city pilot policy in China. Journal of Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117363
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.