The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High-speed rail and CO2 emissions in urban China: A spatial difference-in-differences approach
Abstract
Abstract As the most important emerging transportation technology, high-speed rail (HSR) can reshape regional economic development patterns and exert an important effect on the ecological environment. Using a panel data set of 275 Chinese cities at the prefecture level and above from 2003 to 2014, this study is the first to adopt a continuous spatial difference-in-differences (SDID) model to investigate the effect and its mechanism of HSR service intensity on CO2 emissions. A series of robustness tests are performed, including the placebo test and using the propensity score matching method combined with the SDID (PSM-SDID) model. We also conduct a heterogeneity analysis using a spatial difference-in-difference-in-differences (SDDD) model. The results show that an increase in HSR service intensity significantly reduces urban CO2 emissions, resulting from the effects of transportation substitution, market integration, industrial structure, and technological innovation. Meanwhile, such an increase inhibits CO2 emissions in neighboring cities with a spatial attenuation boundary of 1000 km. On average, for every addition of 100 HSR trains in a city, the total CO2 emissions can be reduced by 0.14%. Moreover, the CO2 emission reduction effect of HSR is more significant in eastern China, large cities, and resource-based cities. However, higher levels of HSR service intensity in large cities and resource-based cities are not conducive to reducing CO2 emissions in neighboring cities. These findings can help to accurately evaluate the social benefits of expanding HSR networks and provide an important decision-making reference for climate governance during the era of HSR.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies
Rubin, D. B. (1974) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0037350 · Cited by 9,436
Cited by
The emerging driving force of inclusive green growth: Does digital economy agglomeration work?
Ren, S., Li, L., Han, Y., Hao, Y., & Wu, H. (2022) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2975 · Cited by 365
Zeng, S., Jin, G., Tan, K., & Liu, X. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117363 · Cited by 365
Wang, X., Wang, X., Ren, X., & Wen, F. (2022) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105966 · Cited by 329
Yuan, D., Jiang, W., Sha, A., Xiao, J., Wu, W., & Wang, T. (2023) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120459 · Cited by 178
Can artificial intelligence achieve carbon neutrality? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment
Chen, S., Zhang, S., Zeng, Q., Ao, J., Chen, X., & Zhang, S. (2023) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2023.1151017 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Jia, R., Shao, S., & Yang, L.
- Venue
- Energy Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-07
- Volume
- 99
- Pages
- 105271
- ISSN
- 0140-9883 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3156069172
- Cited by
- 465
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 63.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-speed rail and CO2 emissions in urban China: A spatial difference-in-differences approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105271
- The paper
- Jia, R., Shao, S., & Yang, L. (2021). High-speed rail and CO2 emissions in urban China: A spatial difference-in-differences approach. Energy Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105271
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.