Cited by 45Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterialsHeavy Metal Pollution Remediation

Effective removal of Pb (II) from wastewater by zinc-iron bimetallic oxide-modified walnut shell biochar: A combined experimental and DFT calculation approach

Chen, Tao, Cao, Guangzhu, Qiang, Yi, Lu, Yanfeng, Qin, Ronggao, Xu, Wan, Xie, Yiming, Mao, Ruoyu·2024·Journal of Environmental Management

Abstract

The modified walnut shell biochar (WBC) was prepared through zinc-iron bimetallic oxide modification (ZF@WBC) at 600 °C under oxygen-limited conditions in this study. Through adsorption experiments, characterization analyses, and density functional theory (DFT) calculations, the adsorption properties of ZF@WBC to Pb (II) were investigated and the mechanism underlying such adsorption was elucidated. Characterization results showed that the surface area (375.9709 m 2/g) and total pore volume (0.205319 cm 3/g) of ZF@WBC were significantly greater than those of walnut shell biochar. The maximum adsorption capacity of ZF@WBC for Pb (II) was found to be 104.26 mg/g, which is 2.57 times higher than that of WBC according to the adsorption experiments conducted. The observed adsorption behavior followed both the pseudo-second-order (PSO) kinetic model and Langmuir isothermal adsorption model, suggesting that chemisorption plays a major role in the absorption process. Based on SEM, XRD, XPS, FTIR characterizations along with DFT calculations performed in this study, it can be concluded that surface complexation, ion exchange, electrostatic attraction, physical absorption are among the main mechanisms responsible for absorption of Pb (II) by ZF@WBC. Furthermore, even in the presence of interfering ions at different concentrations, ZF@WBC exhibited a removal rate above 70% for Pb (II). Therefore, ZF@WBC has great potential as an effective absorbent for removing Pb (II) from wastewater, while also offering opportunities for biomass waste resource utilization.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122757

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, T., Cao, G., Qiang, Y., Lu, Y., Qin, R., Xu, W., Xie, Y., & Mao, R.
Affiliations
Kunming University of Science and Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Qin, Ronggao
Venue
Journal of Environmental Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-11
Volume
370
Pages
122757
ISSN
0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403218840
Cited by
45
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 3
FWCI
5.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (42167052, 42267063)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Heavy Metal Pollution Remediation
Keywords
lead removal, lead adsorption, walnut shell biochar, biochar modification, heavy metal wastewater treatment, adsorption mechanism, surface complexation, ion exchange, electrostatic attraction, pseudo-second-order kinetics, Langmuir isotherm, biomass waste valorization
MeSH terms
Adsorption, Charcoal, Iron, Kinetics, Lead, Oxides, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Zinc, Juglans, Wastewater

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review