Cited by 17Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsPasture and Agricultural SystemsSustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis

Adaptive multi-paddock grazing increases soil carbon stocks and decreases the carbon footprint of beef production in Ontario, Canada

Open access
Mehre, Jessica, Schneider, Kimberley, Jayasundara, Susantha, Gillespie, Adam, Wagner-Riddle, Claudia·2024·Journal of Environmental Management

Abstract

Adaptive multi-paddock (AMP) grazing has been promoted to increase soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks over continuously grazed (CG) pastures; however, the evidence for this is still limited, both in terms of the number of studies conducted and the climates and biomes they cover. The objectives of this study were to determine the effect of grazing management on pasture SOC stocks and to incorporate this SOC sequestration into a life cycle assessment on the greenhouse gas (GHG) intensity (or carbon footprint) of Ontario beef production. Soil cores collected from AMP and CG pastures and annual row crop fields in southern Ontario showed that pastures managed with AMP grazing had significantly higher SOC stocks than CG pastures. Both pastures had SOC stocks higher than annual cropland, resulting in a sequestration rate of 0.957 Mg C ha -1 yr -1 for AMP and 0.507 Mg C ha -1 yr -1 for CG. Without consideration of SOC sequestration, the GHG intensity of beef production is 13.10 kg CO 2 eq kg LW -1 , while including SOC sequestration decreased this intensity by 42% for CG pastures and by 65% for AMP. These results illustrate the importance of including pasture SOC sequestration into beef carbon footprint assessments and should encourage the adoption of AMP grazing in temperate regions to achieve environmental goals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123255

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Initial evidence from beef LCAs incorporating AMP grazing induced SOC accrual suggests substantial GHG mitigation potential, with reported reductions from 65 to 169% lower relative to footprints without SOC offsets.

    “Initial evidence from beef life cycle assessments (LCAs) incorporating AMP grazing induced SOC accrual suggest substantial GHG mitigation potential.Relative to GHG footprints calculated without considering offsets from SOC accrual, reported GHG footprints incorporating measured SOC accrual suggested reductions from 65 to 169% lower (Mehre et al., 2024;Rowntree et al., 2020;Stanley et al., 2018).”
  • Existing studies on AMP and SOC have generally relied on space-for-time comparisons rather than longitudinal data.

    “Existing studies on AMP and SOC have generally relied on space-for-time comparisons rather than longitudinal data (Machmuller et al., 2015;Mehre et al., 2024;Rowntree et al., 2020;Wang et al., 2015), focused on cropland-to-pasture transitions (Machmuller et al., 2015;Mehre et al., 2024;Rowntree et al., 2020), or evaluated only short-term shifts from conventional grazing (Stanley et al., 2018).”
  • Existing studies on AMP and SOC have focused on cropland-to-pasture transitions.

    “focused on cropland-to-pasture transitions (Machmuller et al., 2015;Mehre et al., 2024;Rowntree et al., 2020)”
  • Attempts to measure grazing-induced changes in SOC and incorporate them into LCAs have been sparse in the literature and have yielded widely variable results.

    “Attempts to measure grazing-induced changes in SOC and incorporate them into LCAs have been sparse in the literature and have yielded widely variable results (Lupo et al., 2013;Mehre et al., 2024;Pelletier et al., 2010;Rowntree et al., 2020; see SI Section A.3.4 for a direct comparison with these studies).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mehre, J., Schneider, K., Jayasundara, S., Gillespie, A., & Wagner-Riddle, C.
Affiliations
University of Guelph (CA)
Corresponding author
Mehre, Jessica
Venue
Journal of Environmental Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-12
Volume
371
Pages
123255
ISSN
0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404261186
Cited by
17
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 6
FWCI
3.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Management (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2021-03456)
  • Beef Cattle Research Council (ENV.07.20)
  • Beef Farmers of Ontario (054838)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Pasture and Agricultural Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
Keywords
adaptive multi-paddock grazing, soil organic carbon, carbon sequestration, beef production, carbon footprint, greenhouse gas intensity, grazing management, continuous grazing, pasture management
MeSH terms
Greenhouse Gases, Agriculture, Animals, Carbon, Cattle, Ontario, Soil, Carbon Footprint

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review