Cited by 34Artificial Intelligence ApplicationsHydrological Forecasting Using AIImpact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society

Large Language Models: Tools for New Environmental Decision-Making

Nie, Qiyang, Liu, Tong·2025·Journal of Environmental Management

Abstract

This study represents the first exploration of Large Language Models (LLMs) in environmental decision-making, examining their potential benefits and limitations. To address environmental issues, we propose and compare two generalizable frameworks: an LLMs-assisted framework that leverages LLMs to augment human expertise and coding in traditional decision workflows, and an LLMs-driven framework that aims to automate optimization. Through a water engineering case study focusing on PFAS control, where Environmental Fluid Dynamics Code (EFDC) was used for water environment simulation, we illustrate how to instantiate these frameworks and assess their performance. The case study reveals generalizable insights about these frameworks. Results indicate that both frameworks can contribute to environmental decision-making optimization to varying degrees, though their applicability differs significantly when facing complex decision scenarios. The LLMs-assisted framework, which effectively regulates flow rates and achieves higher PFAS interception, demonstrates how AI can enhance human decision-making while preserving the essential role of domain expertise and professional judgment. In contrast, the LLMs-driven framework faces challenges in handling complex parameter optimization tasks due to constraints such as context window and maximum output length. The findings emphasize the advantages of integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) with conventional environmental modeling and management practices. This work confirms a crucial principle: LLMs should enhance rather than replace human expertise, with the ultimate responsibility for environmental decisions remaining with humans. The originality of this research lies in its innovative methodological approach, which leverages process design and prompt engineering to integrate cutting-edge AI with conventional environmental models, establishing a foundation for responsible human-AI collaboration in environmental decision-making. While examining current strengths and limitations, this framework robustly generates optimized environmental decision strategies, marking a new exploration in the field.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124373

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The EU revised Drinking Water Directive requires Member States to ensure PFAS concentrations in drinking water remain below 0.5 μg/L total PFAS and limit the sum of 20 priority PFAS to 0.1 μg/L by January 2026.

    “To safeguard public health, the European Union has recently taken regulatory action in the form of the revised Drinking Water Directive (EU 2020/2184), under which Member States must ensure PFAS concentrations in drinking water remain below 0.5 µg/L total PFAS and limit the sum of 20 priority PFAS to 0.1 µg/L by January 2026 [13,14,15].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Liu, 2024, Are LLMs capable of data-based statistical and causal reasoning?, Benchmarking Advanced Quantitative Reasoning with Data
  2. Tong, 2024, Can LLMs learn from previous mistakes?, Investigating LLMs’ Errors to Boost for Reasoning

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nie, Q., & Liu, T.
Affiliations
Hokkaido University (JP)
Corresponding author
Liu, Tong
Venue
Journal of Environmental Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-02
Volume
375
Pages
124373
ISSN
0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407053194
Cited by
34
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 7
FWCI
11.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • NextGenerationEU
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency (JPMJSP2119)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
Keywords
large language models, environmental decision-making, human-AI collaboration, EFDC, flow rate optimization, prompt engineering, AI-assisted decision support, context window limitations, human expertise
MeSH terms
Large Language Models, Artificial Intelligence, Decision Making, Environment, Humans, Models, Theoretical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review