The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Temporal pessimism and spatial optimism in environmental assessments: An 18-nation study
Open accessAbstract
The personal assessments of the current and expected future state of the environment by 3232 community respondents in 18 nations were investigated at the local, national, and global spatial levels. These assessments were compared to a ranking of each country's environmental quality by an expert panel. Temporal pessimism (“things will get worse”) was found in the assessments at all three spatial levels. Spatial optimism bias (“things are better here than there”) was found in the assessments of current environmental conditions in 15 of 18 countries, but not in the assessments of the future. All countries except one exhibited temporal pessimism, but significant differences between them were common. Evaluations of current environmental conditions also differed by country. Citizens' assessments of current conditions, and the degree of comparative optimism, were strongly correlated with the expert panel's assessments of national environmental quality. Aside from the value of understanding global trends in environmental assessments, the results have important implications for environmental policy and risk management strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Unrealistic optimism about future life events
Weinstein, N. D. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.806 · Cited by 4,999
Free-Market Ideology and Environmental Degradation: The Case of Belief in Global Climate Change
Heath, Y., & Gifford, R. (2006) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916505277998 · Cited by 473
Self-citation
Cited by
Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years?
Lewicka, M. (2011) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.10.001 · Cited by 2,753
The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation.
Gifford, R. (2011) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0023566 · Cited by 2,326
Self-citationEnvironmental Psychology Matters
Gifford, R. (2014) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115048 · Cited by 903
Self-citationPersonal experience and the ‘psychological distance’ of climate change: An integrative review
McDonald, R. I., Chai, H. Y., & Newell, B. R. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.10.003 · Cited by 655
van der Linden, S., Maibach, E., & Leiserowitz, A. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691615598516 · Cited by 458
Metadata
- Authors
- Gifford, R., Scannell, L., Kormos, C., Smolova, L., Biel, A., Boncu, S., Corral, V., Güntherf, H., Hanyu, K., Hine, D., Kaiser, F. G., Korpela, K., Lima, L. M., Mertig, A. G., Mira, R. G., Moser, G., Passafaro, P., Pinheiro, J. Q., Saini, S., Sako, T., Sautkina, E., Savina, Y., Schmuck, P., Schultz, W., Sobeck, K., Sundblad, E.-L., & Uzzell, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-12
- ISSN
- 0272-4944 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2082047059
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 38.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Temporal pessimism and spatial optimism in environmental assessments: An 18-nation study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.06.001
- The paper
- Gifford, R., Scannell, L., Kormos, C., Smolova, L., Biel, A., Boncu, S., Corral, V., Güntherf, H., Hanyu, K., Hine, D., Kaiser, F. G., Korpela, K., Lima, L. M., Mertig, A. G., Mira, R. G., Moser, G., Passafaro, P., Pinheiro, J. Q., Saini, S., . . . Uzzell, D. (2009). Temporal pessimism and spatial optimism in environmental assessments: An 18-nation study. Journal of Environmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.06.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.