Cited by 46Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants StudiesPlant Toxicity and Pharmacological PropertiesPhytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications

Traditional knowledge on poisonous plants of Udhampur district of Jammu and Kashmir, India

Bhatia, Harpreet, Manhas, R.K., Kumar, Kewal, Magotra, Rani·2014·Journal of Ethnopharmacology

Abstract

Ethnopharmacological relevance Poisonous plants comprise the third largest category of poisons known around the world. Other than affecting the humans directly, they are the major cause of economic losses in the livestock industry since the advent of civilisation. Aim of the present study was to collect and systematically document the traditional knowledge of poisonous plants of Udhampur District for the benefit of humanity before it is entombed forever.Material and methods Direct interviews of the informants were conducted and the plants identified as poisonous by them were collected, identified and herbarium sheets were prepared. The data collected through interviews was analysed with two quantitative tools viz. the factor informant consensus and fidelity level.Results A total of 90 toxic plants were listed from the study site. Most dominant toxic families were Fabaceae, Asteraceae, Solanaceae, Apocynaceae and Euphorbiaceae. Most of the poisonous plants were herbs (57.1%) and the whole plant toxicity was reported to be the highest (32.4%) followed by leaves (23.1%). According to the factor informant consensus, gastrointestinal category had the greatest agreement closely followed by the death category. The most important species on the basis of fidelity level for gastrointestinal category were Cannabis sativa, Cassia occidentalis, Cuscuta reflexa, Euphorbia helioscopia and Euphorbia hirta, for death category were Anagalis arvensis, Embelia robusta and Prunus persica, for dermatological category Euphorbia royleana, Leucaena leucocephala, Parthenium hysterophorus and Urtica dioica, and for sexual illness category were Calotropis procera and Carica papaya.Conclusion Further phytochemical and pharmacological studies are required to ascertain the toxic components of the poisonous plants, so that they may be utilised for the betterment of future generations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jep.2013.12.058

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bhatia, H., Manhas, R. K., Kumar, K., & Magotra, R.
Affiliations
University of Jammu (IN)
Corresponding author
Manhas, R.K.
Venue
Journal of Ethnopharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
152
Issue
1
Pages
207-216
ISSN
0378-8741 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040887578
Cited by
46
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Ethnopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications
Keywords
poisonous plants, traditional knowledge, ethnobotany, Udhampur district, livestock poisoning, informant consensus, fidelity level, phytotoxicity, Euphorbia, Fabaceae, Asteraceae, Solanaceae, Apocynaceae, Euphorbiaceae, medicinal plants
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Data Collection, Female, Humans, India, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Medicine, Traditional, Middle Aged, Plants, Toxic, Ethnopharmacology, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review