Cited by 64Air Quality and Health ImpactsAutophagy in Disease and TherapyIndoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure

The effects of autophagy on vascular endothelial cells induced by airborne PM2.5

Zhou, Zhixiang, Shao, Tong, Qin, Mengnan, Miao, Xiaoyan, Chang, Yu, Sheng, Wang, Wu, Fengshang, Yu, Yunjiang·2018·Journal of Environmental Sciences

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the direct toxicity of PM2.5 collected from Beijing on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC). A Cell Counting Kit 8 (CCK8) assay demonstrated that PM2.5 exposure decreased the proliferation of HUVECs in a dose-dependent manner. We also found that PM2.5 exposure induced autophagy in HUVECs, as evidenced by: (1) an increased number of double-membrane vesicles; (2) enhanced conversion and punctuation of the microtubule-associated protein light chain 3 (LC3); and (3) decreased levels of the selective autophagy substrate p62 in a time-dependent manner. Furthermore, promoting autophagy in PM2.5-exposed HUVECs with rapamycin increased the cell survival rate, whereas inhibiting autophagy via 3-methyladenine significantly decreased cell survival. These results demonstrate that PM2.5 exposure can induce cytotoxicity and autophagy in HUVECs and that autophagy play a protective role against PM2.5-induced cytotoxicity. The findings of the present study imply a direct toxic effect of PM2.5 on HUVECs and provide novel insight into the mechanism of cardiovascular diseases caused by PM2.5 exposure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jes.2017.05.019

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, Z., Shao, T., Qin, M., Miao, X., Chang, Y., Sheng, W., Wu, F., & Yu, Y.
Affiliations
  • Beijing University of Technology (CN)
  • Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences (CN)
  • Ministry of Ecology and Environment (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zhou, Zhixiang
  • Yu, Yunjiang
Venue
Journal of Environmental Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-04
Volume
66
Pages
182-187
ISSN
1001-0742 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2616406385
Cited by
64
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3
FWCI
3.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (21677006, 21177119)
  • Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences (SKLECRA2016OFP)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (KF2015-19)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
Keywords
PM2.5, autophagy, vascular endothelial cells, human umbilical vein endothelial cells, air pollution toxicity, endothelial cell proliferation, LC3 conversion, p62, rapamycin, 3-methyladenine, cardiovascular disease, Beijing air pollution
MeSH terms
Beijing, Air Pollutants, Autophagy, Cell Survival, Humans, Toxicity Tests, Particulate Matter, Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review