The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The moderating role of attitude strength in selective exposure to information
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Brannon et al. (2007) found that stronger, more extreme political attitudes are correlated with higher ratings of interest in attitude-consistent versus attitude-discrepant political articles.”
From What Is the Function of Confirmation Bias? (2022) · cites this paper as Brannon et al. 2007
Citations
Cites
Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-3352 · Cited by 36,647
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
Book Review: The Psychology of Attitudes
Chakravarti, D., Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1997) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151869 · Cited by 7,173
Self-citationConflict, Decision and Dissonance
L., J., & Festinger, L. (1965) · Revue Française de Sociologie · doi:10.2307/3318996 · Cited by 1,356
Petty, R. E., & Krosnick, J. A. (2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315807041 · Cited by 1,313
Attitude strength: An overview.
Krosnick, J., & Petty, R. (1995) · doi:10.4324/9781315807041-8 · Cited by 883
Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-subject designs.
Judd, C. M., Kenny, D. A., & McClelland, G. H. (2001) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.6.2.115 · Cited by 846
Recent Research on Selective Exposure to Information
Frey, D. (1986) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60212-9 · Cited by 820
Jonas, E., Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D., & Thelen, N. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.4.557 · Cited by 725
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–207 of 207
Wall, E. (2026) · Synthesis lectures on visualization · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-09307-3_5
Li, Z., Li, D., Li, M., & Zhang, Y. (2026) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2026.100937
Verleyen, E., Sevenans, J., Soroka, S., & Loewen, P. J. (2026) · Representation · doi:10.1080/00344893.2026.2630890
OLDER AGE IS ASSOCIATED WITH HIGHER LEVELS OF CONFIRMATION BIAS IN CLIMATE-RELATED DECISION MAKINGPreprint
Nolte, J., Shavit, Y. Z., & Ng, W. Q. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7582981
Siebenhaar, K. U., & Alpers, G. W. (2026) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/90732
Metadata
- Authors
- Brannon, L. A., Tagler, M. J., & Eagly, A. H.
- Affiliations
- Kansas State University (US)
- Nebraska Wesleyan University (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Brannon, Laura A.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 611-617
- ISSN
- 0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2040884903
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 17.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
- Keywords
- selective exposure, attitude strength, attitude consistency, information seeking, attitude change, moderating effect
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review