Cited by 113Social Power and Status DynamicsExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Social status as a cue for tacit coordination

Kwaadsteniet, Erik W. de, Dijk, Eric van·2010·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.01.005

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Roles affect groups' capacity for coordination by signaling who will undertake what action.

    “Roles affect groups’ capacity for coordination by signaling who will undertake what action (de Kwaadsteniet & van Dijk, 2010).”

    From Stories in Action. (2022) · cites this paper as de Kwaadsteniet & van Dijk, 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kwaadsteniet, E. W. D., & Dijk, E. V.
Affiliations
Leiden University (NL)
Corresponding author
Kwaadsteniet, Erik W. de
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
515-524
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029744476
Cited by
113
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 12
FWCI
25.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
social status, tacit coordination, deference, social hierarchy, dominance hierarchy, social power, perspective taking, conflicting preferences, asymmetric preferences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review