The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From women to objects: Appearance focus, target gender, and perceptions of warmth, morality and competence
Open accessAbstract
Most literally, objectification refers to perceiving a person as an object, and consequently, less than fully human. Research on perceptions of humanness and the stereotype content model suggests that humanness is linked to perceptions of warmth, morality and competence. Merging these insights with objectification theory, we hypothesized that focusing on a woman's, but not a man's, appearance should induce objectification, and thus reduce perceptions of these characteristics. In three studies, females, but not males, were perceived as less competent (Studies 2 and 3) and less warm and moral (Studies 1, 2 and 3) when participants were instructed to focus on their appearance. These findings support our position and help rule out stereotype activation as an alternative explanation to dehumanization. Further, they generalized to targets of different races, familiarity, physical attractiveness and occupational status. Implications for gender inequity and the perpetuation of objectification of women are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1954) · Cited by 15,935
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878 · Cited by 7,364
Objectification Theory: Toward Understanding Women's Lived Experiences and Mental Health Risks
Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T.-A. (1997) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x · Cited by 5,531
Social psychology: handbook of basic principles
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-3496 · Cited by 5,473
The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.70.3.491 · Cited by 5,202
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-0626 · Cited by 4,674
Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005 · Cited by 4,567
Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures
Buss, D. M. (1989) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00023992 · Cited by 4,484
(1949) · Cited by 4,313
Moral Disengagement in the Perpetration of Inhumanities
Bandura, A. (1999) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3 · Cited by 4,228
Cited by
Ellemers, N., van der Toorn, J., Paunov, Y., & van Leeuwen, T. (2019) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868318811759 · Cited by 394
Of Animals and Objects: Men’s Implicit Dehumanization of Women and Likelihood of Sexual Aggression
Rudman, L. A., & Mescher, K. (2012) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167212436401 · Cited by 338
Media and sexualization: State of empirical research, 1995–2015
Ward, L. M. (2016) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2016.1142496 · Cited by 337
More than a body: Mind perception and the nature of objectification.
Gray, K., Knobe, J., Sheskin, M., Bloom, P., & Barrett, L. F. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0025883 · Cited by 277
Revisiting the Jezebel Stereotype: The Impact of Target Race on Sexual Objectification
Anderson, J. R., Holland, E., Heldreth, C., & Johnson, S. P. (2018) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0361684318791543 · Cited by 139
Metadata
- Authors
- Heflick, N. A., Goldenberg, J. L., Cooper, D. P., & Puvia, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-05
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 572-581
- ISSN
- 0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2006116925
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 66
- FWCI
- 35.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From women to objects: Appearance focus, target gender, and perceptions of warmth, morality and competence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.020
- The paper
- Heflick, N. A., Goldenberg, J. L., Cooper, D. P., & Puvia, E. (2011). From women to objects: Appearance focus, target gender, and perceptions of warmth, morality and competence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.