CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 223

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Taking turns: Reciprocal self-disclosure promotes liking in initial interactions

Sprecher, Susan, Treger, Stanislav, Wondra, Joshua D., Hilaire, Nicole, Wallpe, Kevin·2013·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
DOI 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.017
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.017

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Altman, 1973, Reciprocity of interpersonal exchange, Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 3, 249, 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1973.tb00325.x · DOI
  2. Aron, 1992, Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596, 10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Collins, 1994, Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review, Psychological Bulletin, 116, 457, 10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.457 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Cozby, 1972, Self-disclosure, reciprocity, and liking, Sociometry, 35, 151, 10.2307/2786555 · DOI
  5. Davis, 1979, Consequences of responsiveness in dyadic interaction: Effects of probability of response and proportion of content-related responses on interpersonal attraction, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 534, 10.1037/0022-3514.37.4.534 · DOI
  6. Derlega, 1973, Self-disclosure reciprocity, liking, and the deviant, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 277, 10.1016/0022-1031(73)90065-6 · DOI
  7. Dindia, 1988, A comparison of several statistical tests of reciprocity of self-disclosure, Communication Research, 15, 726, 10.1177/009365088015006004 · DOI
  8. Ehrlich, 1971, Reciprocal self-disclosure in a dyad, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 389, 10.1016/0022-1031(71)90073-4 · DOI
  9. Finkel, 2012, Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science, Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 3, 10.1177/1529100612436522 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Hill, 1982, Disclosure reciprocity: Conceptual and measurement issues, Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 238, 10.2307/3033919 · DOI
  11. Kashy, 1995, Measurement and data analytic issues in couples research, Psychological Assessment, 7, 338, 10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.338 · DOI
  12. Reis, 2011, Familiarity does indeed promote attraction in live interaction, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 557, 10.1037/a0022885 · DOI
  13. Rubin, 1975, Disclosing oneself to a stranger: Reciprocity and its limits, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 233, 10.1016/S0022-1031(75)80025-4 · DOI
  14. Sedikides, 1999, The relationship closeness induction task, Representative Research in Social Psychology, 23, 1
  15. Tamir, 2012, Disclosing information about the self is intrinsically rewarding, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 8038, 10.1073/pnas.1202129109 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Whatley, 1999, The effect of a favor on public and private compliance: How internalized is the norm of reciprocity?, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 251, 10.1207/S15324834BASP2103_8 · DOI
  17. Won-Doornink, 1979, On getting to know you: The association between the stage of a relationship and reciprocity of self-disclosure, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 229, 10.1016/0022-1031(79)90034-9 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sprecher, S., Treger, S., Wondra, J. D., Hilaire, N., & Wallpe, K.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
49
Issue
5
Pages
860-866
ISSN
0022-1031
DOI
10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.017
Cited by
223
References
5
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review