Testing the prosocial effectiveness of the prototypical moral emotions: Elevation increases benevolent behaviors and outrage increases justice behaviors
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
The weirdest people in the world?
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0999152x · Cited by 12,641 · see citing works
Moral Emotions and Moral Behavior
Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Mashek, D. J. (2007) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070145 · Cited by 3,222 · see citing works
Heart Strings and Purse Strings: Carryover Effects of Emotions on Economic Decisions
Lerner, J. S., Small, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2004) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00679.x · Cited by 959 · see citing works
Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2009) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699930802110007 · Cited by 574 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Van Bavel, J. J., Robertson, C. E., del Rosario, K., Rasmussen, J., & Rathje, S. (2024) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-022123-110258 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
- Authors
- Van de Vyver, J., & Abrams, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Kent (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Abrams, Dominic
- ORCID
- Abrams, Dominic
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-05
- Volume
- 58
- Pages
- 23-33
- ISSN
- 0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2036368446
- Cited by
- 120
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 5.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- dro.dur.ac.uk
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) (acceptedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/J500148/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
- Keywords
- moral elevation, moral outrage, moral emotions, prosocial behavior, appraisal tendency framework, benevolence, justice, charitable giving, third-party compensation, bystander behavior, moral transgression, moral virtues
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
