Cited by 575Psychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentSocial and Intergroup PsychologyEmotions and Moral Behavior

Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals

Inbar, Yoel, Pizarro, David A., Bloom, Paul·2009·Cognition & Emotion

Abstract

The uniquely human emotion of disgust is intimately connected to morality in many, perhaps all, cultures (Rozin, Lowery, Imada, & Haidt, 1999b). We report two studies suggesting that a predisposition to feel disgust (“disgust sensitivity”) is associated with more conservative political attitudes, especially for issues related to the moral dimension of purity. In the first study, we document a positive correlation between disgust sensitivity and self-reported conservatism in a broad sample of US adults. In Study 2 we show that while disgust sensitivity is associated with more conservative attitudes on a range of political issues, this relationship is strongest for purity-related issues—specifically, abortion and gay marriage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02699930802110007

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Results are mixed on whether disgust sensitivity to pathogens is higher in conservatives than in liberals; Inbar et al. (2009) found that conservatives have greater disgust.

    “Results are mixed on this, actually; Inbar et al. (2009) found that conservatives have greater disgust.”
  • Subjective perception of infection risk causes individuals to be more conformist, prefer conformity and obedience in others, respond more negatively toward nonconformists, and endorse more conservative socio-political attitudes.

    “empirical evidence reveals that the subjective perception of infection risk causes individuals to be more conformist, to prefer conformity and obedience in others, to respond more negatively toward others who fail to conform, and to endorse more conservative socio-political attitudes [10], [11], [12], [13], [14].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Inbar, Yoel
Venue
Cognition & Emotion
Published
2009-06
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
714-725
ISSN
  • 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0600
OpenAlex
W2142553311
Cited by
574
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 35
FWCI
9.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognition & Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
disgust sensitivity, political conservatism, moral emotions, purity, moral dimensions, abortion, same-sex marriage, political attitudes, liberals and conservatives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review