The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rheological characterisation of ceramic inks for 3D direct ink writing: A review
Open accessAbstract
3D printing is a competitive manufacturing technology, which has opened up new possibilities for the fabrication of complex ceramic structures and customised parts. Extrusion-based technologies, also known as direct ink writing (DIW) or robocasting, are amongst the most used for ceramic materials. In them, the rheological properties of the ink play a crucial role, determining both the extrudability of the paste and the shape fidelity of the printed parts. However, comprehensive rheological studies of printable ceramic inks are scarce and may be difficult to understand for non-specialists. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the main types of ceramic ink formulations developed for DIW and a detailed description of the more relevant rheological tests for assessing the printability of ceramic pastes. Moreover, the key rheological parameters are identified and linked to printability aspects, including the values reported in the literature for different ink compositions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Additive manufacturing of metals
Herzog, D., Seyda, V., Wycisk, E., & Emmelmann, C. (2016) · Acta Materialia · doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.019 · Cited by 4,759
Polymers for 3D Printing and Customized Additive Manufacturing
Ligon, S. C., Liska, R., Stampfl, J., Gurr, M., & Mülhaupt, R. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074 · Cited by 3,741
25th Anniversary Article: Engineering Hydrogels for Biofabrication
Malda, J., Visser, J., Melchels, F. P., Jüngst, T., Hennink, W. E., Dhert, W. J. A., Groll, J., & Hutmacher, D. W. (2013) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201302042 · Cited by 1,901
Printability and shape fidelity of bioinks in 3D bioprinting
Schwab, A., Levato, R., D’Este, M., Piluso, S., Eglin, D., & Malda, J. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00084 · Cited by 1,359
Bos, F., Wolfs, R., Ahmed, Z., & Salet, T. (2016) · Virtual and Physical Prototyping · doi:10.1080/17452759.2016.1209867 · Cited by 1,257
Paxton, N., Smolan, W., Böck, T., Melchels, F., Groll, J., & Jungst, T. (2017) · Biofabrication · doi:10.1088/1758-5090/aa8dd8 · Cited by 950
Additive Manufacturing of Ceramic‐Based Materials
Travitzky, N., Bonet, A., Dermeik, B., Fey, T., Filbert‐Demut, I., Schlier, L., Schlordt, T., & Greil, P. (2014) · Advanced Engineering Materials · doi:10.1002/adem.201400097 · Cited by 878
Vafadar, A., Guzzomi, F., Rassau, A., & Hayward, K. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11031213 · Cited by 748
Colloidal Inks for Directed Assembly of 3-D Periodic Structures
Smay, J. E., Cesarano, J., & Lewis, J. A. (2002) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la0257135 · Cited by 700
Paolini, A., Kollmannsberger, S., & Rank, E. (2019) · Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2019.100894 · Cited by 673
Metadata
- Authors
- del-Mazo-Barbara, L., & Ginebra, M.-P.
- Venue
- Journal of the European Ceramic Society
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-12
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 18-33
- ISSN
- 0955-2219 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3194493989
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 88
- FWCI
- 19.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rheological characterisation of ceramic inks for 3D direct ink writing: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.08.031
- The paper
- del-Mazo-Barbara, L., & Ginebra, M.-P. (2021). Rheological characterisation of ceramic inks for 3D direct ink writing: A review. Journal of the European Ceramic Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.08.031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
