Cited by 54Phytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesFood and Agricultural SciencesPostharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management

Effect of boiling on phenolic profiles determined using HPLC/ESI-LTQ-Orbitrap-MS, physico-chemical parameters of six plantain banana cultivars (Musa sp)

Open access
Passo Tsamo, Claudine Valérie, Herent, Marie-France, Tomekpe, Kodjo, Happi Emaga, Thomas, Quetin-Leclercq, Joëlle, Rogez, Hervé, Larondelle, Yvan, Andre, Christelle M.·2015·Journal of Food Composition and Analysis

Abstract

The effect of boiling on pulp and peel phenolic profiles of five plantain cultivars and the plantain hybrid F568 was evaluated using high-performance liquid chromatography/electrospray ionisation-linear trap quadrupole-Orbitrap-mass spectrometry (HPLC/ESI-LTQ-Orbitrap-MS) and HPLC-diode array detector (DAD) analysis on sample extracts obtained by a solid/liquid extraction. Total soluble solids, pH, water, and total ash contents were also determined. After boiling the whole fruit, total phenolics decreased considerably in the peel (34.3% on average), whereas no significant change was observed in the pulp after boiling with or without peel. With regards to individual phenolic compounds, all the peel flavonols decreased except for myricetin-deoxyhexose-hexoside, with maximum losses of 61.3% and 59.8% of kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside and rutin, respectively, for the cultivar Red Yade. In both pulp and peel, ferulic acid was apparently released from its conjugated forms after boiling, with increases of 63.7% after boiling with peel and of 33.2% after boiling without peel in the pulp of the cultivar Moto Ebanga. Changes in water and total ash contents also suggested a protective effect of the peel. Finally, the principal component analysis revealed that peel total ash content and pH were strongly correlated to the decrease in phenolics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jfca.2015.08.012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Passo Tsamo, C. V., Herent, M.-F., Tomekpe, K., Happi Emaga, T., Quetin-Leclercq, J., Rogez, H., Larondelle, Y., & Andre, C. M.
Affiliations
UCLouvain (BE)
Venue
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
44
Pages
158-169
ISSN
0889-1575 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1938541836
Cited by
54
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Food Composition and Analysis (publishedVersion)
  • Agritrop (Cirad) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Académie de recherche et d’enseignement supérieur (ARES, Belgium)
  • Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research (FNRS) (FRFC 2.4555.08)
  • UCL
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
Keywords
plantain, Musa, boiling, phenolic compounds, flavonols, ferulic acid, peel, pulp, cultivar differences, total phenolic content, physicochemical properties, total ash, pH

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review