Cited by 62Analytical chemistry methods developmentPesticide Residue Analysis and SafetyIonic liquids properties and applications

Optimization deep eutectic solvent-based ultrasound-assisted liquid-liquid microextraction by using the desirability function approach for extraction and preconcentration of organophosphorus pesticides from fruit juice samples

Heidari, Hassan, Ghanbari-Rad, Samira, Habibi, Esmaeil·2020·Journal of Food Composition and Analysis

Abstract

A deep eutectic solvent-based ultrasound-assisted liquid-liquid microextraction (DES-UALLME) followed by quantitative analysis using HPLC-UV has been developed for the determination of organophosphorus pesticides (phosalone and chlorpyrifos) in fruit juice samples (red grape juice and sour cherry juice). In DES-UALLME, ultrasonication was applied to transfer the aggregated of DES into tiny droplets. The parameters that influence on extraction efficiency were studied and optimized by central composite design (CCD) in combination with a desirability function approach. The optimum conditions obtained by multivariate optimization were 408 μL of DES, 560 μL of THF, pH of 5.92, and an ultrasonication time of 12.31 min. Under the optimized condition, wide linear range (1–500 ng mL⁻¹), low detection limits (0.070 and 0.096 ng mL⁻¹), high enrichment factors, and good extraction recoveries were obtained. The procedure was successfully applied for the determination of phosalone and chlorpyrifos in red grape juice and sour cherry juice samples with satisfactory relative recoveries (87.3–116.7 %).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jfca.2019.103389

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heidari, H., Ghanbari-Rad, S., & Habibi, E.
Affiliations
  • Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University (IR)
  • Urmia University (IR)
Corresponding author
Heidari, Hassan
Venue
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
87
Pages
103389
ISSN
0889-1575 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2994728476
Cited by
62
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9
FWCI
4.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Ionic liquids properties and applications
Keywords
deep eutectic solvents, organophosphorus pesticides, phosalone, chlorpyrifos, fruit juice, red grape juice, sour cherry juice, desirability function, extraction optimization, pesticide preconcentration, food safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review