The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determination of antioxidant activity in free and hydrolyzed fractions of millet grains and characterization of their phenolic profiles by HPLC-DAD-ESI-MSn
Open accessAbstract
Over 50 phenolic compounds belonging to several classes, namely, phenolic acids and their derivatives, dehydrodiferulates and dehydrotriferulates, flavan-3-ol monomers and dimers, flavonols, flavones and flavanonols in four phenolics fractions of several whole millet grains (kodo, finger (Ravi), finger (local), foxtail, proso, little and pearl millets) were positively or tentatively identified using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry (MSn). Total phenolic content (TPC) was determined colourimetrically using Folin–Ciocalteu reagent. Antioxidant and antiradical activities of phenolic fractions were estimated using oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity, and singlet oxygen scavenging activity. In addition, antioxidant activities of phenolic fractions were determined in a β-carotene linoleate emulsion system. Insoluble bound fraction of kodo millet showed the highest phenolic content as well as antioxidant activity in the in vitro test systems employed. In general, hydroxycinnamic acids and their derivatives were the main contributors (87–98%) to the TPC of insoluble bound phenolic fraction of millet varieties examined. Flavonoids were predominantly present in the free phenolic fractions of two finger millet varieties and included catechin, epicatechin, gallocatechin, epigallocatechin, and procyanidin dimers B1 and B2 among others. The degree of esterification or etherification of phenolics with sugar residues in the soluble fraction changed with the variety. Thus millet grains may serve as a viable functional food ingredient and a source of natural antioxidants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Colorimetry of Total Phenolics with Phosphomolybdic-Phosphotungstic Acid Reagents
Singleton, V. L., & Rossi, J. A. (1965) · American Journal of Enology and Viticulture · doi:10.5344/ajev.1965.16.3.144 · Cited by 24,852
Cited by
Chandra, D., Chandra, S., Pallavi, & Sharma, A. K. (2016) · Food Science and Human Wellness · doi:10.1016/j.fshw.2016.05.004 · Cited by 346
Chandrasekara, A., & Shahidi, F. (2012) · Journal of Functional Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jff.2011.11.001 · Cited by 334
Self-citationFoxtail millet: Properties, processing, health benefits, and uses
Sharma, N., & Niranjan, K. (2018) · Food Reviews International · doi:10.1080/87559129.2017.1290103 · Cited by 304
Profile of phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of finger millet varieties
Xiang, J., Apea-Bah, F. B., Ndolo, V. U., Katundu, M. C., & Beta, T. (2019) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.09.120 · Cited by 267
Finger Millet (Ragi, Eleusine coracana L.)
Shobana, S., Krishnaswamy, K., Sudha, V., Malleshi, N. G., Anjana, R. M., Palaniappan, L., & Mohan, V. (2013) · Advances in Food and Nutrition Research · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-410540-9.00001-6 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Chandrasekara, A., & Shahidi, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Functional Foods
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 144-158
- ISSN
- 1756-4646 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2048625851
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination of antioxidant activity in free and hydrolyzed fractions of millet grains and characterization of their phenolic profiles by HPLC-DAD-ESI-MSn. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jff.2011.03.007
- The paper
- Chandrasekara, A., & Shahidi, F. (2011). Determination of antioxidant activity in free and hydrolyzed fractions of millet grains and characterization of their phenolic profiles by HPLC-DAD-ESI-MSn. Journal of Functional Foods. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2011.03.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.