The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bank ownership type and banking relationships
Abstract
The authors formulate and test hypotheses about the role of bank ownership types-foreign, state-owned, and private domestic banks-in banking relationships, using data from India. The empirical results are consistent with all of their hypotheses with regard to foreign banks. These banks tend to serve as the main bank for transparent firms, and firms with foreign main banks are most likely to have multiple banking relationships, have the most relationships, and diversify relationships across bank ownership types. The data are also consistent with the hypothesis that firms with state-owned main banks are relatively unlikely to diversify across bank ownership types. However, state-owned banks often do not provide the main relationship for firms they are mandated to serve (for example, small, opaque firms), and the predictions of negative effects on multiple banking and number of relationships hold for only one type of state-owned bank.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Benefits of Lending Relationships: Evidence from Small Business Data
PETERSEN, M. A., & RAJAN, R. G. (1994) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1994.tb04418.x · Cited by 5,440
Insiders and Outsiders: The Choice between Informed and Arm's‐Length Debt
RAJAN, R. G. (1992) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04662.x · Cited by 3,902
N. Berger, A., & F. Udell, G. (1998) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/s0378-4266(98)00038-7 · Cited by 3,690
Self-citationRelationship Lending and Lines of Credit in Small Firm Finance
Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (1995) · The Journal of Business · doi:10.1086/296668 · Cited by 3,636
Self-citationThe effect of credit market competition on lending relationships
Petersen, M. A., & Rajan, R. G. (1995) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118445 · Cited by 3,294
Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (2000) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00229 · Cited by 2,582
La Porta, R., Lopez‐De‐Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/1540-6261.00422 · Cited by 2,511
Information Production and Capital Allocation: Decentralized versus Hierarchical Firms
Stein, J. C. (2002) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00483 · Cited by 2,421
Relationship Banking: What Do We Know?
Boot, A. W. A. (2000) · Journal of Financial Intermediation · doi:10.1006/jfin.2000.0282 · Cited by 2,354
SHARPE, S. A. (1990) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1990.tb02427.x · Cited by 2,324
Cited by
Hasan, I., Jackowicz, K., Kowalewski, O., & Kozłowski, Ł. (2017) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.03.009 · Cited by 135
Metadata
- Authors
- Berger, A. N., Klapper, L. F., Martinez Peria, M. S., & Zaidi, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Financial Intermediation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-62
- ISSN
- 1042-9573 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2083448576
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 69
- FWCI
- 24.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bank ownership type and banking relationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jfi.2006.11.001
- The paper
- Berger, A. N., Klapper, L. F., Martinez Peria, M. S., & Zaidi, R. (2008). Bank ownership type and banking relationships. Journal of Financial Intermediation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2006.11.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.