Cited by 428Financial Markets and Investment StrategiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis

IQ, trading behavior, and performance

Open access
Grinblatt, Mark, Keloharju, Matti, Linnainmaa, Juhani T.·2012·Journal of Financial Economics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.05.016

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A host of variables (e.g., IQ, cognitive abilities, geography, portfolio concentration, age, and past performance) reliably predict cross-sectional variation in performance.

    “Recent research documents that a host of variables (e.g., IQ, cognitive abilities, geography, portfolio concentration, age, and past performance) reliably predict crosssectional variation in performance.”

    From The cross-section of speculator skill: Evidence from day trading (2014) · cites this paper as Grinblatt, Keloharju, and Linnainmaa (2012)

  • The lion's share of abnormal returns earned around an informed trade occurs immediately following the trade.

    “Several prior studies document that the lion's share of abnormal returns earned around an informed trade occurs immediately following the trade (e.g., Coval, Hirshleifer and Shumway (2005); Grinblatt, Keloharju, and Linnainmaa (2012); Barber, Lee, Liu, and Odean (2009)).”

    From The cross-section of speculator skill: Evidence from day trading (2014) · cites this paper as Grinblatt, Keloharju, and Linnainmaa (2012)

  • Most of the gains (and losses) from trade tend to occur immediately following a trade.

    “Most of the gains (and losses) from trade tend to occur immediately following a trade (see Barber, Lee, Liu, and Odean (2009), Coval, Hirshleifer, and Shumway (2005), Grinblatt, Keloharju, and Linnainmaa (2012)).”

    From The cross-section of speculator skill: Evidence from day trading (2014) · cites this paper as Grinblatt, Keloharju, and Linnainmaa (2012)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grinblatt, M., Keloharju, M., & Linnainmaa, J. T.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Centre for Economic Policy Research (GB)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Grinblatt, Mark
Venue
Journal of Financial Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-05
Volume
104
Issue
2
Pages
339-362
ISSN
0304-405X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3125407596
Cited by
428
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 16
FWCI
38.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Financial Economics (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Keywords
IQ, investor behavior, trade performance, disposition effect, tax-loss selling, liquidity provision, market timing, stock-picking skill, trade execution, transaction costs, limit order book, intelligence test scores

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review