Cited by 1,222Financial Markets and Investment StrategiesFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Equity Portfolio Diversification

Goetzmann, William N., Kumar, Alok·2008·Review of Finance

Abstract

This study shows that U.S. individual investors hold under-diversified portfolios, where the level of under-diversification is greater among younger, low-income, less-educated, and less-sophisticated investors. The level of under-diversification is also correlated with investment choices that are consistent with over-confidence, trend-following behavior, and local bias. Furthermore, investors who over-weight stocks with higher volatility and higher skewness are less diversified. In contrast, there is little evidence that portfolio size or transaction costs constrains diversification. Under-diversification is costly to most investors, but a small subset of investors under-diversify because of superior information.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/rof/rfn005

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Highly literate investors tend to manage their risks significantly better than low literate individuals.

    “Moreover, a number of studies has documented a positive link between financial literacy and portfolio diversification: highly literate investors tend to manage their risks significantly better than the group of low literate individuals (e.g., Calvet et al. 2007;Goetzmann and Kumar 2008;Guiso and Jappelli 2008;von Gaudecker 2015;Clark et al. 2015).”

    From Financial literacy, financial advice, and financial behavior (2017) · cites this paper as Goetzmann and Kumar 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goetzmann, W. N., & Kumar, A.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
Review of Finance
Published
2008-01-01
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
433-463
ISSN
  • 1382-6662 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-692X
  • 1572-3097
OpenAlex
W3122442489
Cited by
1,222
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 101 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 80 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 69
FWCI
78.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Finance Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
portfolio diversification, under-diversification, retail investors, investor sophistication, overconfidence, local bias, stock market volatility, skewness, investor demographics, portfolio size, transaction costs, diversification costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review