The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Subtyping stuttering I: A review
Abstract
Unlabelled A reliable and practical subtype system of stuttering should enhance all related scientific work concerned with this disorder. Although a fair number of classification systems have been offered, to date, none has received wide recognition or has been routinely applied in research or clinical spheres. Whereas progress has been made in understanding and treating the disorder, for the most part stuttering continues to be viewed and addressed as a unitary problem. The objectives of the current article are to (a) highlight the motivation for identifying sub-types of stuttering, (b) outline the issues involved in researching subtypes, and (c) address the question of whether or not subtyping is plausible for this disorder. Toward these ends, a broad-based review of past concepts regarding subtypes of stuttering and stutterers is presented according to seven categories that reflect the various authors' conceptual or experimental approaches. Selected studies for each category are also presented to illustrate the research problems and challenges. It is concluded that islands of progress can be identified in subtype research, particularly in studies of children. It is recommended that future studies include multiple factors or domains in the data collection process, especially with young children during the formative years of the disorder, when substantial overlap in the development of several speech/language domains occurs. Educational objectives (a) Readers will be able to describe the theory and research concerning the numerous attempts to subtype stuttering, particularly during the past 50 years; (b) Readers will be able to explain the general issues that need to be resolved in order to identify subtypes as well as current and future research strategies aimed at achieving these goals.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As stuttering manifests differently for each individual [107], participants interpreted and prioritized certain labels based on what aspects of their speech they find most meaningful.”
From Disability-First AI Dataset Annotation: Co-designing Stuttered Speech Annotation Guidelines with People Who Stutter (2026) · cites this paper as [107]
Citations
Cites
Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study.
Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936) · Psychological Monographs · doi:10.1037/h0093360 · Cited by 2,018
The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias.
Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. G. (1999) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.415 · Cited by 1,924
Bloodstein, O. (1969) · Cited by 1,017
Stuttering: An Integrated Approach to Its Nature and Treatment
Guitar, B. E. (1991) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 975
Hemispheric Specialization for Speech Perception
Studdert‐Kennedy, M., & Shankweiler, D. (1970) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1912174 · Cited by 750
Bootstraps taxometrics: Solving the classification problem in psychopathology
Meehl, P. E. (1995) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.50.4.266 · Cited by 702
Bootstraps taxometrics: Solving the classification problem in psychopathology.
Meehl, P. E. (1995) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.50.4.266 · Cited by 702
van Riper, C. (1971) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 682
Nature and Treatment of Stuttering: New Directions
Curlee, R. F., & Perkins, W. H. (1984) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 681
Stuttering and the basal ganglia circuits: a critical review of possible relations
Alm, P. A. (2004) · Journal of Communication Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2004.03.001 · Cited by 587
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Berlin, A., (1954). An exploratory attempt to isolate types of stuttering. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University.
- Chang, 2004, Structural evidence for sensorimotor deficits in children who stutter: An MRI study. Presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing annual convention, Asha Leader, 15, 101
- Chang, 2005, An MRI study on childhood stuttering persistence and recovery. Presented at the convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing annual convention, Asha Leader, 10, 114
- Daly, 1981, Differentiating stuttering subgroups with Van Riper's developmental tracks: A preliminary study, Journal of National Student Speech and Hearing Association, 9, 89
- Dostalova, 1966, Aspects of the three main categories of neurotic stuttering, De Therapie Loquelis, 1, 273
- Froeschels, 1943, Pathology and therapy of stuttering, Nervous Child, 2, 148
- Graham, 1966, Neurologic and encephalographic abnormalities in stuttering and matched nonstuttering adults, Speech Monographs, 33, 290
- Graham, 1961, Neurologic and encephalographic abnormalities in stuttering and matched nonstuttering adults, ASHA, 3, 342
- Riley, J. (1971). Language profiles of thirty nine children who stutter grouped by performance on the Motor Problems Inventory. Master's thesis, California State University, Fullerton.
- Stromsta, C. (1965). A spectographic study of disfluencies labeled as stuttering by parents. De Therapia Vocis et Loquelae, Vol. 1, XIII, Congress of the International Society of Logogedics and Phoniatrics.
- Tsunoda, 1972, Specific patterns of cerebral dominance for various sounds in adult stutterers, Journal of Auditory Research, 12, 216
- Yairi, 1990, Subtyping child stutterers for research purposes, ASHA Reports, 18, 50
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–104 of 104
Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis of Speech Fluency Disorders
Adams, C., Angerstein, W., Baracca, G., Cook, S., Dejonckere, P. H. O., Echternach, M., Eggers, K., Eysholdt, U., Fussi, F., Geneid, A., et al. (2025) · European manual of medicine · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-25175-7_8 · Cited by 1
An Autoethnographic Exploration of an African American Male Professor who Stutters
Ellis, A. L. (2016) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-68123-557-820251014
Is covert articulation impaired in developmental stuttering?
Thorre, A. V., & Vannuscorps, G. (2026) · Journal of Fluency Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2026.106241
Metadata
- Authors
- Yairi, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Yairi, Ehud
- Venue
- Journal of Fluency Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 165-196
- ISSN
- 0094-730X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1993295537
- Cited by
- 104
- References
- 93
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 1.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Fluency Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01 DC 05210, R01DC005210)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Stuttering Research and Treatment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Keywords
- stuttering, speech and language development, fluency disorders, research strategies
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Male, Research, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Stuttering, Incidence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review