Cited by 702Psychometric Methodologies and TestingMental Health Research TopicsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Bootstraps taxometrics: Solving the classification problem in psychopathology

Meehl, Paul E.·1995·American Psychologist

Abstract

Classification in psychopathology is a problem in applied mathematics; it answers the empirical question "Is the latent structure of these phenotypic indicator correlations taxonic (categories) or nontaxonic (dimensions, factors)?" It is not a matter of convention or preference. Two taxometric procedures, MAMBAC and MAXCOV-HITMAX, provide independent tests of the taxonic conjecture and satisfactorily accurate estimates of the taxon base rate, the latent means, and the valid and false-positive rates achievable by various cuts. The method requires no gold standard criterion, applying crude fallible diagnostic "criteria" only in the phase of discovery to identify plausible candidate indicators. Confidence in the inference to taxonic structure and numerical accuracy of latent values is provided by multiple consistency tests, hence the term coherent cut kinetics for the general approach. Further revision of diagnostic systems should be based on taxometric analysis rather than on committee decisions based on clinical impressions and nontaxometric research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0003-066x.50.4.266

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For the four retained indicators, the mean full-sample inter-indicator correlation was 0.37 and the mean within-taxon and complement correlations were ≤ 0.06, satisfying the requirement for a sizeable difference between full-sample and within-group correlations.

    “Satisfying these requirements, for the four indicators, mean full sample r = 0.37 and mean taxon and complement rs ≤ 0.06.”
  • All four indicators separated the putative taxon from its complement at Cohen's d ≥ 1.25, satisfying the recommended minimum validity.

    “This condition was satisfied in the current study (for all indicators, d ≥ 1.25)2.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meehl, P. E.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Meehl, Paul E.
Venue
American Psychologist
Published
1995-04
Volume
50
Issue
4
Pages
266-275
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
OpenAlex
W2081843991
Cited by
702
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 25
FWCI
17.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
psychopathology classification, diagnostic criteria, cut-off values, latent structure
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review