Cited by 4Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesMinimally Invasive Surgical TechniquesBody Contouring and Surgery

Computed tomography–based gastric volumetry for morbid obesity to assess weight loss and fatty liver change

Open access
Chen, Hsin-Yu, Yang, Po-Jen, Lee, Po-Chu, Chuang, Po-Han, Yang, Yung-Hsuan, Chiu, Wan-Ting, Wu, Chih-Horng·2024·Journal of the Formosan Medical Association

Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is an effective treatment for patients with morbid obesity, but the optimal gastric volume (GV) for resection remains unclear. Accordingly, we aimed to determine the optimal percentage of excised stomach that could engender significant weight loss and improve fatty liver. METHODS: This prospective study included 63 patients. Computed tomography (CT) scans were performed before and 1 year after LSG to evaluate the gastric lumen (GL) and GV. Specifically, the stomach was distended with effervescent powder, following water-contrast mixture (20:1) and assessed by three-dimensional reconstruction. The correlations of reduced gastric lumen/volume (RGL/RGV) with total body weight (BW) loss and liver-spleen density ratio (LSDR) changes were analyzed, and optimal RGL/RGV associated with significant BW and fatty liver changes were determined. RESULTS: We noted a positive correlation between the percentage of RGV/RGL (%RGV/%RGL) and percentage of total weight loss (%TWL; r = 0.359, p = 0.004 and r = 0.271, p = 0.032). Furthermore, a %RGL value of >78.2% and %RGV value of >75.3% were associated with more significant BW loss than did limited excision (both p < 0.01). On the other hand, LSDR values increased significantly after LSG, corresponding to the improvement of fatty liver disease at %RGL and %RGV values of >59.1% and >56.4% (both p < 0.01), respectively. CONCLUSION: %RGV and %RGL were determined to be factors affecting LSG outcomes. LSG engendered significantly more BW loss when %RGV was >75.3% and resulted in fatty liver disease improvement when %RGV was >56.4%.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jfma.2024.02.018

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, H.-Y., Yang, P.-J., Lee, P.-C., Chuang, P.-H., Yang, Y.-H., Chiu, W.-T., & Wu, C.-H.
Affiliations
National Taiwan University (TW)
Corresponding author
Wu, Chih-Horng
Venue
Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-12
Volume
123
Issue
12
Pages
1287-1293
ISSN
0929-6646 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392350643
Cited by
4
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Formosan Medical Association (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Taiwan University Hospital (106-23, 111-TMU363)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Body Contouring and Surgery
Keywords
laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, morbid obesity, weight loss, hepatic steatosis, gastric volume, bariatric surgery outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Fatty Liver, Female, Gastrectomy, Humans, Liver, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Morbid, Organ Size, Laparoscopy, Prospective Studies, Stomach, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Weight Loss, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review