Cited by 51Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesLiver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentOrgan Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Resolves NAFLD: Another Formal Indication for Bariatric Surgery?

Esquivel, Carlos Martin, Garcia, Manuel, Armando, Lucas, Ortiz, Guillermo, Lascano, Fernando Martínez, Foscarini, José María·2018·Obesity Surgery

Abstract

Introduction Obesity is strongly associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD); 66-99% of the obese population could suffer some grade of NAFLD. It can progress into cirrhosis, which is associated to hepatocellular carcinoma, and a liver transplant could be indicated. NAFLD represents the third cause of liver transplant, and it is expected to be the first by 2025. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most common bariatric procedure over the world. There is scant literature regarding NAFLD after SG, and there are no prospective studies published up to date. Objective To evaluate the evolution of NAFLD in patients with obesity after 1 year of SG. Methods From January 2009 to December 2013, intraoperative liver biopsy was performed in 63 obese patients who underwent SG. Forty-three patients were again biopsied 1 year after surgery. Demographics, body mass index, percentage of excess weight loss, liver function test, lipid panel, glucose panel, and histological changes were prospectively analyzed. Results One hundred percent of the patients reversed or reduced the stage of steatosis or steatohepatitis 12 months after surgery, obtaining a statistically significant difference for both steatosis and steatohepatitis. One patient presented complete cirrhosis regression in the pathology. Neither of the patients had worsened liver histology. Conclusions NAFLD could be dealt with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, preventing its progression into cirrhosis. SG can be performed in patients with obesity and metabolic syndrome, with NAFLD showing satisfactory results 12 months after surgery. NAFLD should be a formal indication for bariatric surgery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11695-018-3466-7

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Esquivel, C. M., Garcia, M., Armando, L., Ortiz, G., Lascano, F. M., & Foscarini, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Católica de Córdoba (AR)
  • National University of Villa María (AR)
Venue
Obesity Surgery
Published
2018-08-18
Volume
28
Issue
12
Pages
4022-4033
ISSN
  • 0960-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1708-0428
OpenAlex
W2885764421
Cited by
51
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5
FWCI
4.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obesity Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Keywords
laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Gastrectomy, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Morbid, Laparoscopy, Prospective Studies, Weight Loss, Treatment Outcome, Disease Progression, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review