Cited by 8Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthChronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Comparative efficacy and choice of lipid-lowering drugs for cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Open access
Lin, Yi-Chih, Lai, Tai-Shuan, Chen, Yi-Ting, Chou, Yu-Hsiang, Chen, Yung-Ming, Hung, Kuan-Yu, Tu, Yu-Kang·2025·Journal of the Formosan Medical Association

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effect of exact classes of lipid-lowering drugs (LLDs) on preventing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and poor renal outcomes is not well characterized in the chronic kidney disease (CKD) population. METHODS: We performed a frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the protective effect of the LLDs in non-dialysis CKD patients. The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for relevant trials published before March 31, 2024. The primary outcome was the incidence of MACEs. The secondary outcomes comprised all-cause mortality, end-stage kidney disease, changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and proteinuria, and safety. RESULTS: Forty-nine eligible RCTs with 77,826 participants with non-dialysis CKD were included. With moderate confidence in the evidence, rosuvastatin and atorvastatin showed statistically significantly more efficacy in reducing the risk of MACE, with a pooled risk ratio of 0.55 (95% CI 0.33-0.91) for rosuvastatin and 0.67 (0.49-0.90) for atorvastatin, respectively, compared with the control group. For the change in the eGFR, atorvastatin (mean difference [MD], 1.40; 95% CI, 0.61 to 2.18), rosuvastatin (MD, 1.73; 95% CI, 0.63 to 2.83), and statin plus ezetimibe (MD, 2.35; 95% CI, 0.44 to 4.26) showed statistically significant increases in the mean eGFR. CONCLUSION: In patients with non-dialysis CKD, there is sufficient evidence to show that rosuvastatin and atorvastatin were statistically significantly more effective and preferable in reducing the risk of MACE and increasing the mean eGFR compared with the control group.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jfma.2024.09.037

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, Y.-C., Lai, T.-S., Chen, Y.-T., Chou, Y.-H., Chen, Y.-M., Hung, K.-Y., & Tu, Y.-K.
Affiliations
National Taiwan University (TW)
Venue
Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-11
Volume
124
Issue
11
Pages
1056-1064
ISSN
0929-6646 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403310280
Cited by
8
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Formosan Medical Association (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Taiwan University
  • Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (106-2314-B-002-098-MY3)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
lipid-lowering drugs, chronic kidney disease, predialysis, major adverse cardiovascular events, rosuvastatin, atorvastatin, statins, ezetimibe, estimated glomerular filtration rate, end-stage renal disease, proteinuria, all-cause mortality, drug safety
MeSH terms
Rosuvastatin Calcium, Atorvastatin, Ezetimibe, Network Meta-Analysis as Topic, Hypolipidemic Agents, Cardiovascular Diseases, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review