Cited by 7,218Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsClinical practice guidelines implementationDelphi Technique in Research

Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions

Open access
Cumpston, Miranda, Li, Tianjing, Page, Matthew J, Chandler, Jacqueline, Welch, Vivian A, Higgins, Julian PT, Thomas, James·2019·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

On a shelf in the sunny, open-plan office of Cochrane Australia in Melbourne, there's a large, white ring-binder that, it's fair to say, hasn't been opened in a

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.ed000142

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [2]2. Oxman A, editor. Preparing and maintaining systematic reviews. In:Sackett DL, editor. The Cochrane Collaboration Handbook.Oxford (UK):The Cochrane Collaboration, 1994.
  2. [4]4. Higgins JPT,Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons,2008.
  3. [5]5. Dickersin K.Establishing and maintaining registers of RCTs. In: Sackett DL, editor. The Cochrane Collaboration Handbook. Oxford (UK): The Cochrane Collaboration,1994.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., Chandler, J., Welch, V. A., Higgins, J. P., & Thomas, J.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-10-03
Volume
10
Pages
ED000142-ED000142
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W2978795816
Cited by
7,218
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 610 · 2025: 1253 · 2024: 1372 · 2023: 1288 · 2022: 1157 · 2021: 981 · 2020: 521 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
137.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0617-10145)
  • Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12023/24)
  • National Eye Institute (UG1EY020522)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
Keywords
systematic review methodology, Cochrane Collaboration
MeSH terms
Systematic Reviews as Topic, Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review