Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 325Phytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesAgricultural and Biological ResearchFermentation and Sensory Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Antioxidants from grape stalks and marc: Influence of extraction procedure on yield, purity and antioxidant power of the extracts

Spigno, Giorgia, De Faveri, Dante Marco·2007·Journal of Food Engineering

Abstract

This study was aimed to assess the feasibility of extracting antioxidant compounds from wine-making wastes (grape stalks and marc) by solvent extraction. Together with the type of raw material it was also investigated the influence of some process parameters on final antioxidants yields and extract purity: a degreasing pre-treatment, type of solvent (ethanol or a mixture ethylacetate:water/9:1), temperature (28 or 60 °C) and length of maceration (5 or 24 h). Solvent and temperature were statistically influent (p < 0.05), and the yields were higher with ethanol (but with lower purities) and at 60 °C. Antioxidant power of the extracts was evaluated by different analytical methods. An accurate comparison of our data with many literature works about antioxidants recovery from different natural sources showed similar results and highlighted a general great variability in the extraction procedures.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.11.020

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Alcolea, 2002, Hydrophilic and lipophilic antioxidant activities of grapes, Nahrung/Food, 46, 353, 10.1002/1521-3803(20020901)46:5<353::AID-FOOD353>3.0.CO;2-B · DOI
  2. Dapkevicius, 1998, Antioxidant activity of extracts obtained by different isolation procedures from some aromatic herbs grown in Lithuania, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 77, 140, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199805)77:1<140::AID-JSFA18>3.0.CO;2-K · DOI
  3. Ribèreau-Gayon, 1970, Le dosage des composés phénoliques totaux dans le vins rouges, Chimie Analytique, 52, 627
  4. Spigno, G., Fusca, F., & De Faveri, D. M., (2004). Wine-making wastes: Cellulose and hemicelluloses recovery by mild methods, In Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress on Engineering and Food, Montpellier, F.

Cited by

See all 325

Metadata

Authors
Spigno, G., & De Faveri, D. M.
Affiliations
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
Corresponding author
Spigno, Giorgia
Venue
Journal of Food Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-02
Volume
78
Issue
3
Pages
793-801
ISSN
0260-8774 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042174599
Cited by
325
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 20
FWCI
4.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Journal of Food Engineering (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry (medical) › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Biological Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
Keywords
grape stalks, grape pomace, antioxidants, solvent extraction, ethanol extraction, extraction temperature, maceration time, extraction yield

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.