Cited by 25Distributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsGuidance and Control Systems

Distributed observer-based close formation control for UAV swarm under outside disturbances and wake interferences

Wang, Zhijie, Wang, Ting, Li, Tao, Mao, Zehui·2024·Journal of the Franklin Institute

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2024.106651

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Decentralized control paradigms reduce latency using distributed tuning, as seen in UAV swarms with rapid recovery.

    “while decentralized control paradigms reduce latency using distributed tuning, as seen in UAV swarms with rapid recovery [27,44].”
  • Hardware acceleration including GPUs with a 2 GHz clock and FPGA with a 100 MHz clock enables rapid responses in swarms.

    “Hardware acceleration, including GPUs with a 2 GHz clock and FPGA with a 100 MHz clock, enables rapid responses in swarms [27,29]”
  • Distributed control manages fleets of 5-50 robots with efficiency and achieves rapid coordination in UAV swarms.

    “Distributed control manages fleets of 5-50 robots with efficiency [4], achieving rapid coordination in UAV swarms [27]”
  • High-Redundancy Actuation retains capacity in UAV swarms when paired with sensor redundancy such as Inertial Measurement Units at 100 Hz and LiDAR for rapid fault detection.

    “HRA, detailed in Section Key Technical Methods in Hybrid FTC, retains capacity in UAV swarms when paired with sensor redundancy, such as Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) at 100 Hz and Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) for rapid fault detection [3,27].”
  • Radial Basis Function networks with a 0.01 learning rate approximate uncertainties with Lyapunov stability, excelling in UAV swarms with rapid recovery.

    “Radial Basis Function (RBF) networks with a 0.01 learning rate approximate uncertainties with Lyapunov stability, excelling in UAV swarms with rapid recovery [10,27].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Z., Wang, T., Li, T., & Mao, Z.
Affiliations
  • Nanjing Forestry University (CN)
  • Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Tao
Venue
Journal of the Franklin Institute
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-03
Volume
361
Issue
5
Pages
106651
ISSN
0016-0032 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391509125
Cited by
25
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 1
FWCI
4.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the Franklin Institute (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61922042, 62073164)
  • Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
  • Aeronautical Science Foundation of China (2023Z032052001)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Guidance and Control Systems
Keywords
UAV swarms, distributed observer, prescribed performance control, wake interference, distributed cooperative control, fixed-wing UAV, disturbance estimation, adaptive control, asymptotic stability, Kronecker product

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review