Cited by 105

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Biosorption of Acid Red 274 (AR 274) on Enteromorpha prolifera in a batch system

Özer, Ayla, Akkaya, Gönül, Turabik, Meral·2005·Journal of Hazardous Materials

Abstract

The biosorption of Acid Red 274 (AR 274) dye on Enteromorpha prolifera, a green algae grown on Mersin costs of the Mediterranean, Turkey, was studied as a function of initial pH, temperature, initial dye and biosorbent concentration. The experiments were conducted in a batch manner. The Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms were used for modelling the biosorption equilibrium. At optimum temperature 30 degrees C and initial pH 2.0-3.0, the Langmuir isotherm fits best to the experimental equilibrium data with a maximum monolayer coverage of 244 mg/g. The equilibrium AR 274 concentration of the exit stream of a single batch was also obtained by using the experimental equilibrium curve and operating line graphically. The pseudosecond-order kinetic model and Weber-Morris model were applied to the experimental data and it was found that both the surface adsorption as well as intraparticle diffusion contribute to the actual adsorption process. The biosorption process follows a pseudosecond-order kinetics and activation energy was determined as -4.85 kJ/mol. Thermodynamic studies showed that the biosorption of AR 274 on E. prolifera is exothermic and spontaneous in nature.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.06.018

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Mohan, 2002, Waste Manage., 22, 575, 10.1016/S0956-053X(02)00030-2 · DOI
  2. Pakshirajan, 2005, Chem. Eng. J., 105, 131, 10.1016/j.cej.2004.10.008 · DOI
  3. Wong, 2004, Process Biochem., 39, 693, 10.1016/S0032-9592(03)00152-3 · DOI
  4. Choi, 1996, Environ. Technol., 17, 1169, 10.1080/09593331708616487 · DOI
  5. Fu, 2001, Bioresour. Technol., 79, 251, 10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00028-1 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Nigam, 2000, Bioresour. Technol., 72, 219, 10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00123-6 · DOI
  7. Allen, 2003, Bioresour. Technol., 8, 143, 10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00281-X · DOI
  8. Robinson, 2001, Bioresour. Technol., 77, 247, 10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00080-8 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Waranusantigul, 2003, Environ. Pollut., 125, 385, 10.1016/S0269-7491(03)00107-6 · DOI
  10. Juang, 1997, Environ. Technol., 18, 525, 10.1080/09593331808616568 · DOI
  11. Özer, 2003, J. Hazardous Mater. B, 100, 219, 10.1016/S0304-3894(03)00109-2 · DOI
  12. Chiou, 2002, J. Hazardous Mater. B, 93, 233, 10.1016/S0304-3894(02)00030-4 · DOI
  13. Hashim, 2004, Chem. Eng. J., 97, 249, 10.1016/S1385-8947(03)00216-X · DOI
  14. Aguilera-Morales, 2005, J. Food Cons. Anal., 18, 79, 10.1016/j.jfca.2003.12.012 · DOI
  15. Basibuyuk, 2003, Process Biochem., 38, 1311, 10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00327-8 · DOI
  16. Robinson, 2002, Bioresour. Technol., 85, 43, 10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00070-6 · DOI
  17. Bouizada, 2002, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 21, 151, 10.1016/S0928-4931(02)00096-6 · DOI
  18. Namasivayam, 2002, Dyes and Pigments, 54, 47, 10.1016/S0143-7208(02)00025-6 · DOI
  19. O’Mohany, 2002, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 31, 456, 10.1016/S0141-0229(02)00110-2 · DOI
  20. Aksu, 2000, Process Biochem., 36, 437
  21. Banat, 2003, Process Biochem., 39, 193, 10.1016/S0032-9592(03)00065-7 · DOI
  22. Özer, 1999, Process Biochem., 34, 919, 10.1016/S0032-9592(99)00011-4 · DOI
  23. Dönmez, 2002, Process Biochem., 38, 751, 10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00204-2 · DOI
  24. Shukla, 2002, J. Hazardous Mater., B95, 137, 10.1016/S0304-3894(02)00089-4 · DOI
  25. Aksu, 2004, Sep. Purif. Technol., 35, 223, 10.1016/S1383-5866(03)00144-8 · DOI
  26. Manohar, 2002, Water Res., 36, 1609, 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00362-1 · DOI
  27. Ho, 1998, Chem. Eng. J., 70, 115, 10.1016/S0923-0467(98)00076-1 · DOI
  28. Ho, 1999, Process Biochem., 34, 451, 10.1016/S0032-9592(98)00112-5 · DOI
  29. Ho, 1998, Adsorp. Sci. Technol., 16, 243, 10.1177/026361749801600401 · DOI
  30. Kannan, 2001, Dyes and Pigments, 51, 25, 10.1016/S0143-7208(01)00056-0 · DOI
  31. Silva, 2004, Sep. Purif. Technol., 40, 309, 10.1016/j.seppur.2004.03.010 · DOI
  32. Ho, 2002, Process Biochem., 37, 1421, 10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00036-5 · DOI
  33. Hall, 1966, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fund., 5, 212, 10.1021/i160018a011 · DOI
  34. Vadivelan, 2005, J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 286, 90, 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.01.007 · DOI
  35. Choi, 1996, Environ. Technol., 17, 1169, 10.1080/09593331708616487 · DOI
  36. Aksu, 2002, Process Biochem., 38, 89, 10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00051-1 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Özer, A., Akkaya, G., & Turabik, M.
Venue
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-11
Volume
126
Issue
1-3
Pages
119-127
ISSN
0304-3894
Cited by
105
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review