The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biosorption of Acid Red 274 (AR 274) on Enteromorpha prolifera in a batch system
Abstract
The biosorption of Acid Red 274 (AR 274) dye on Enteromorpha prolifera, a green algae grown on Mersin costs of the Mediterranean, Turkey, was studied as a function of initial pH, temperature, initial dye and biosorbent concentration. The experiments were conducted in a batch manner. The Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms were used for modelling the biosorption equilibrium. At optimum temperature 30 degrees C and initial pH 2.0-3.0, the Langmuir isotherm fits best to the experimental equilibrium data with a maximum monolayer coverage of 244 mg/g. The equilibrium AR 274 concentration of the exit stream of a single batch was also obtained by using the experimental equilibrium curve and operating line graphically. The pseudosecond-order kinetic model and Weber-Morris model were applied to the experimental data and it was found that both the surface adsorption as well as intraparticle diffusion contribute to the actual adsorption process. The biosorption process follows a pseudosecond-order kinetics and activation energy was determined as -4.85 kJ/mol. Thermodynamic studies showed that the biosorption of AR 274 on E. prolifera is exothermic and spontaneous in nature.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ulva prolifera demonstrated 96% efficacy in the removal of Acid Red-274 colorant.
“In a separate investigation, Ulva prolifera demonstrated a remarkable 96% efficacy in the removal of Acid Red-274 colorant [215].”
From Recent Advances in the Remediation of Textile-Dye-Containing Wastewater: Prioritizing Human Health and Sustainable Wastewater Treatment (2024) · cites this paper as [215]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- Mohan, 2002, Waste Manage., 22, 575, 10.1016/S0956-053X(02)00030-2 · DOI
- Pakshirajan, 2005, Chem. Eng. J., 105, 131, 10.1016/j.cej.2004.10.008 · DOI
- Wong, 2004, Process Biochem., 39, 693, 10.1016/S0032-9592(03)00152-3 · DOI
- Choi, 1996, Environ. Technol., 17, 1169, 10.1080/09593331708616487 · DOI
- Fu, 2001, Bioresour. Technol., 79, 251, 10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00028-1 · DOI · Paper page
- Nigam, 2000, Bioresour. Technol., 72, 219, 10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00123-6 · DOI
- Allen, 2003, Bioresour. Technol., 8, 143, 10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00281-X · DOI
- Robinson, 2001, Bioresour. Technol., 77, 247, 10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00080-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Waranusantigul, 2003, Environ. Pollut., 125, 385, 10.1016/S0269-7491(03)00107-6 · DOI
- Juang, 1997, Environ. Technol., 18, 525, 10.1080/09593331808616568 · DOI
- Özer, 2003, J. Hazardous Mater. B, 100, 219, 10.1016/S0304-3894(03)00109-2 · DOI
- Chiou, 2002, J. Hazardous Mater. B, 93, 233, 10.1016/S0304-3894(02)00030-4 · DOI
- Hashim, 2004, Chem. Eng. J., 97, 249, 10.1016/S1385-8947(03)00216-X · DOI
- Aguilera-Morales, 2005, J. Food Cons. Anal., 18, 79, 10.1016/j.jfca.2003.12.012 · DOI
- Basibuyuk, 2003, Process Biochem., 38, 1311, 10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00327-8 · DOI
- Robinson, 2002, Bioresour. Technol., 85, 43, 10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00070-6 · DOI
- Bouizada, 2002, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 21, 151, 10.1016/S0928-4931(02)00096-6 · DOI
- Namasivayam, 2002, Dyes and Pigments, 54, 47, 10.1016/S0143-7208(02)00025-6 · DOI
- O’Mohany, 2002, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 31, 456, 10.1016/S0141-0229(02)00110-2 · DOI
- Aksu, 2000, Process Biochem., 36, 437
- Banat, 2003, Process Biochem., 39, 193, 10.1016/S0032-9592(03)00065-7 · DOI
- Özer, 1999, Process Biochem., 34, 919, 10.1016/S0032-9592(99)00011-4 · DOI
- Dönmez, 2002, Process Biochem., 38, 751, 10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00204-2 · DOI
- Shukla, 2002, J. Hazardous Mater., B95, 137, 10.1016/S0304-3894(02)00089-4 · DOI
- Aksu, 2004, Sep. Purif. Technol., 35, 223, 10.1016/S1383-5866(03)00144-8 · DOI
- Manohar, 2002, Water Res., 36, 1609, 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00362-1 · DOI
- Ho, 1998, Chem. Eng. J., 70, 115, 10.1016/S0923-0467(98)00076-1 · DOI
- Ho, 1999, Process Biochem., 34, 451, 10.1016/S0032-9592(98)00112-5 · DOI
- Ho, 1998, Adsorp. Sci. Technol., 16, 243, 10.1177/026361749801600401 · DOI
- Kannan, 2001, Dyes and Pigments, 51, 25, 10.1016/S0143-7208(01)00056-0 · DOI
- Silva, 2004, Sep. Purif. Technol., 40, 309, 10.1016/j.seppur.2004.03.010 · DOI
- Ho, 2002, Process Biochem., 37, 1421, 10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00036-5 · DOI
- Hall, 1966, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fund., 5, 212, 10.1021/i160018a011 · DOI
- Vadivelan, 2005, J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 286, 90, 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.01.007 · DOI
- Choi, 1996, Environ. Technol., 17, 1169, 10.1080/09593331708616487 · DOI
- Aksu, 2002, Process Biochem., 38, 89, 10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00051-1 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Periyasamy, A. P. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16020495 · Cited by 652
Aksakal, O., & Ucun, H. (2010) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.05.064 · Cited by 266
Removal of malachite green from aqueous solution using low-cost chlorella-based biomass
Tsai, W.-T., & Chen, H.-R. (2010) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.10.087 · Cited by 184
Metadata
- Authors
- Özer, A., Akkaya, G., & Turabik, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Hazardous Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 119-127
- ISSN
- 0304-3894
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review