Cited by 568Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalArsenic contamination and mitigationCoagulation and Flocculation Studies

Characterization of mesoporous rice husk ash (RHA) and adsorption kinetics of metal ions from aqueous solution onto RHA

Srivastava, Vimal Chandra, Mall, Indra Deo, Mishra, Indra Mani·2006·Journal of Hazardous Materials

Abstract

The present study deals with the characterization of low-cost rice husk ash (RHA) for its various physico-chemical properties and adsorption characteristics of metal ions. The average particle size of RHA was 150.47mum. Proximate analysis showed the presence of high amount of ash in RHA. Bulk density and the heating value of RHA were 104.9kg/m(3) and 9.68MJ/kg, respectively. The pore size distribution results showed that the RHA was predominantly mesoporous. The BET surface area was 36.44m(2)/g. The average pore diameter by BET was 42.603A. The BJH pore area showed 80% of the pore area due to the mesopores. The polar groups present on the RHA surface imparted considerable cation exchange capacity to it. RHA was found to be an effective adsorbent for the removal of cadmium (Cd(II)), nickel (Ni(II)) and zinc (Zn(II)) metal ions from aqueous solutions. The pH(0) approximately 6.0 is found to be the optimum for the removal of individual cations from the aqueous solutions by RHA at an optimum dose of 10kg/m(3). The kinetics of adsorption showed that the metal ions adsorption on RHA is a gradual process with quasi-equilibrium being attained in 5h. The pseudo-second-order kinetics represents the equilibrium data well. The effective diffusion coefficient of the cations onto the RHA is of the order of 10(-13)m(2)/s.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.11.052

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Srivastava, V. C., Mall, I. D., & Mishra, I. M.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IN)
Corresponding author
Mall, Indra Deo
Venue
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-06-30
Volume
134
Issue
1-3
Pages
257-267
ISSN
0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010716624
Cited by
568
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 25
FWCI
14.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Education, India
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
Keywords
rice husk ash, mesoporous adsorbent, metal ion adsorption, cadmium removal, nickel removal, zinc removal, adsorption kinetics, pseudo-second-order kinetics, cation exchange capacity, low-cost adsorbent, wastewater treatment, effective diffusion coefficient
MeSH terms
Adsorption, Cadmium, Carbon, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Ions, Kinetics, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Nickel, Oryza, Solutions, Time Factors, Zinc, Porosity, Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review