Cited by 35Air Quality Monitoring and ForecastingAir Quality and Health ImpactsHydrological Forecasting Using AI

Prediction of air pollutant concentrations based on the long short-term memory neural network

Open access
Wu, Zechuan, Tian, Yuping, Li, Mingze, Wang, Bin, Quan, Ying, Liu, Jianyang·2024·Journal of Hazardous Materials

Abstract

In recent years, environmental problems caused by air pollutants have received increasing attention. Effective prediction of air pollutant concentrations is an important way to protect the public from harm. Recently, due to extreme climate and social development, the forest fire frequency has increased. During the biomass combustion process caused by forest fires, the content of particulate matter (PM) in the atmosphere increases significantly. However, most existing air pollutant concentration prediction methods do not consider the considerable impact of forest fires, and effective long-term prediction models have not been established to provide early warnings for harmful gases. Therefore, in this paper, we collected a daily air quality data set (aerodynamic diameter smaller than 2.5 µm, PM 2.5) for Heilongjiang Province, China, from 2017 to 2023 and A novel Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model was proposed to effectively predict the situation of air pollutants. The model could automatically extract information of the effective time step from the historical data set and combine forest fire disturbance and climate data as auxiliary data to improve the model prediction ability. Moreover, we created artificial neural network (ANN) and permissive regression (support vector machine, SVR) models for comparative experiments. The results showed that the precision accuracy of the developed LSTM model is higher. Unlike the other models, the LSTM neural network model could effectively predict the concentration of air pollutants in long-term series. Regarding long-term observation missions (7 days), the proposed model performed well and stably, with R 2 reaching over 88%.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.133099

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Wu, Z., Tian, Y., Li, M., Wang, B., Quan, Y., & Liu, J.
Affiliations
Northeast Forestry University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Li, Mingze
  • Wang, Bin
Venue
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-03
Volume
465
Pages
133099
ISSN
0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4389071026
Cited by
35
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 9
FWCI
2.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
International Science and Technology Cooperation Programme (2020YFC1511603)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
Keywords
air pollutant concentration prediction, PM2.5, long short-term memory neural network, forest fires, biomass combustion, long-term time series forecasting, air quality, Heilongjiang
MeSH terms
Air Pollutants, Air Pollution, Environmental Monitoring, Memory, Short-Term, Neural Networks, Computer, Particulate Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review