Cited by 97Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesCriminal Law and Policy

Does liberalizing cannabis laws increase cannabis use?

Open access
Williams, Jenny, Bretteville-Jensen, Anne Line·2014·Journal of Health Economics

Abstract

A key question in the ongoing policy debate over cannabis' legal status is whether liberalizing cannabis laws leads to an increase in cannabis use. This paper provides new evidence on the impact of a specific type of liberalization, decriminalization, on initiation into cannabis use. Our identification strategy exploits variation in the timing of cannabis policy reforms and our estimation framework marries a difference-in-difference approach with a discrete time duration model. Our results reveal evidence of both heterogeneity and dynamics in the response of cannabis uptake to decriminalization. Overall, we find that the impact of decriminalization is concentrated amongst minors, who have a higher rate of uptake in the first five years following its introduction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2014.03.006

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The scope of the review was limited to recreational legalization and did not consider other forms of policy changes such as medicinal legalization or decriminalization.

    “Additionally, the scope of the review was limited to recreational legalization and did not consider other forms of policy changes such as medicinal legalization or decriminalization, as these have been summarized more comprehensively in prior reviews.112-114”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, J., & Bretteville-Jensen, A. L.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Williams, Jenny
Venue
Journal of Health Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-07
Volume
36
Pages
20-32
ISSN
0167-6296 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165452721
Cited by
95
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
6.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Health Economics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Australian Research Council (DP0770580)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Law and Policy
Keywords
cannabis decriminalization, cannabis policy reform, youth cannabis use, drug policy, policy timing, discrete-time duration models, cannabis legalization
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Australia, Marijuana Abuse, Criminal Law, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Legislation, Drug, Male, Marijuana Smoking, Public Policy, Retrospective Studies, United States, Age of Onset, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Drug Users, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review