Cited by 135Liver physiology and pathologyLiver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentHippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ

Accumulation of duct cells with activated YAP parallels fibrosis progression in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Open access
Machado, Mariana Verdelho, Michelotti, Gregory Alexander, Pereira, Thiago Almeida, Xie, Guanhua, Premont, Richard, Cortez-Pinto, Helena, Diehl, Anna Mae·2015·Journal of Hepatology

Abstract

Background & aims Mechanisms that regulate regeneration of injured livers are complex. YAP, a stem cell associated factor, controls liver growth in healthy adult mice. Increasing nuclear localization of YAP triggers accumulation of reactive-appearing ductular cells (YAP+RDC) with liver progenitor capabilities. The significance of YAP activation, and mechanisms involved, are unknown in diseased livers. We evaluated the hypothesis that YAP is more activated in injured livers that are scarring than in those that are regenerating effectively.Methods Immunohistochemistry and qRT-PCR analysis were used to localize and quantify changes in YAP and RDC in 52 patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and two mouse models of diet-induced non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Results were correlated with liver disease severity, metabolic risk factors, and factors proven to control NAFLD progression.Results YAP increased in NAFLD where it mainly localized in nuclei of RDC that expressed progenitor markers. Accumulation of YAP+RDC paralleled the severity of hepatocyte injury and accumulation of Sonic hedgehog, but not steatosis or metabolic risk factors. YAP+RDC expressed osteopontin, a Shh-regulated fibrogenic factor. Myofibroblast accumulation, fibrosis, and numbers of YAP+RDC strongly correlated. In murine NASH models, atrophic fibrotic livers contained significantly more YAP+RDC than livers with less severe NASH.Conclusion YAP+RDC promote scarring, rather than effective regeneration, during NASH.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.05.031

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other major sources of hedgehog ligands may be reactive-appearing ductular cells that correlate with fibrosis in MASH patients, or MASH-associated hepatocytes in which increased cholesterol activates TAZ to drive Indian hedgehog expression and secretion.

    “Other major sources of hedgehog ligands may be reactive-appearing ductular cells that strongly correlate with fibrosis in patients with MASH or in MASH-associated hepatocytes where increased cholesterol intake activate TAZ to drive Indian hedgehog expression and secretion (112, 113, 163).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Machado, M. V., Michelotti, G. A., Pereira, T. A., Xie, G., Premont, R., Cortez-Pinto, H., & Diehl, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Diehl, Anna Mae
Venue
Journal of Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
63
Issue
4
Pages
962-970
ISSN
0168-8278 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130148732
Cited by
135
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 1
FWCI
5.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r37aa010154-20)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R37 AA-010154)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK0077794, R01DK077794, DK053792, R01DK053792)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ
Keywords
YAP, liver fibrosis, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, liver regeneration, Sonic hedgehog, osteopontin, myofibroblasts, hepatocyte injury, liver progenitor cells
MeSH terms
YAP-Signaling Proteins, Adult, Animals, Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic, Biopsy, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Liver Cirrhosis, Experimental, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Phosphoproteins, RNA, Messenger, Blotting, Western, Disease Progression, Cell Cycle Proteins, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Hepatocytes, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, Mice, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review