Cited by 385Liver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Non-invasive stratification of hepatocellular carcinoma risk in non-alcoholic fatty liver using polygenic risk scores

Open access

Abstract

Background & Aims Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk stratification in individuals with dysmetabolism is a major unmet need. Genetic predisposition contributes to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We aimed to exploit robust polygenic risk scores (PRS) that can be evaluated in the clinic to gain insight into the causal relationship between NAFLD and HCC, and to improve HCC risk stratification. Methods We examined at-risk individuals (NAFLD cohort, n = 2,566; 226 with HCC; and a replication cohort of 427 German patients with NAFLD) and the general population (UK Biobank [UKBB] cohort, n = 364,048; 202 with HCC). Variants in PNPLA3-TM6SF2-GCKR-MBOAT7 were combined in a hepatic fat PRS (PRS-HFC), and then adjusted for HSD17B13 (PRS-5). Results In the NAFLD cohort, the adjusted impact of genetic risk variants on HCC was proportional to the predisposition to fatty liver ( p = 0.002) with some heterogeneity in the effect. PRS predicted HCC more robustly than single variants ( p < 10 -13 ). The association between PRS and HCC was mainly mediated through severe fibrosis, but was independent of fibrosis in clinically relevant subgroups, and was also observed in those without severe fibrosis ( p < 0.05). In the UKBB cohort, PRS predicted HCC independently of classical risk factors and cirrhosis ( p < 10 -7 ). In the NAFLD cohort, we identified high PRS cut-offs (≥0.532/0.495 for PRS-HFC/PRS-5) that in the UKBB cohort detected HCC with ~90% specificity but limited sensitivity; PRS predicted HCC both in individuals with ( p < 10 -5 ) and without cirrhosis ( p < 0.05). Conclusions Our results are consistent with a causal relationship between hepatic fat and HCC. PRS improved the accuracy of HCC detection and may help stratify HCC risk in individuals with dysmetabolism, including those without severe liver fibrosis. Further studies are needed to validate our findings. Lay summary By analyzing variations in genes that contribute to fatty liver disease, we developed two risk scores to help predict liver cancer in individuals with obesity-related metabolic complications. These risk scores can be easily tested in the clinic. We showed that the risk scores helped to identify the risk of liver cancer both in high-risk individuals and in the general population.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.11.024

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 37 references

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 385

Metadata

Authors
Bianco, C., Jamialahmadi, O., Pelusi, S., Baselli, G., Dongiovanni, P., Zanoni, I., Santoro, L., Maier, S., Liguori, A., Meroni, M., Borroni, V., D’Ambrosio, R., Spagnuolo, R., Alisi, A., Federico, A., Bugianesi, E., Petta, S., Miele, L., Vespasiani-Gentilucci, U., Anstee, Q. M., Stickel, F., Hampe, J., Fischer, J., Berg, T., Fracanzani, A. L., Soardo, G., Reeves, H., Prati, D., Romeo, S., & Valenti, L.
Affiliations
  • Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT)
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • University of Udine (IT)
  • Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT)
  • Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital (IT)
  • University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT)
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (IT)
  • University of Palermo (IT)
  • Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University Hospital Zurich (CH)
  • University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE)
  • University Hospital Leipzig (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Romeo, Stefano
  • Valenti, Luca
Venue
Journal of Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
74
Issue
4
Pages
775-782
ISSN
0168-8278 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3106622583
Cited by
385
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 60 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 52
FWCI
35.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Hepatology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Institutional Research Information System (University of Udine) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (submittedVersion)
  • Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (310030_169196)
  • Marianne and Marcus Wallenberg Foundation (KAW 2017.0203)
  • Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse
  • Swiss Foundation for Alcohol Research
  • AbbVie
  • Akebia Therapeutics
  • Amgen
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden (DIA 2017-205, 9321-430)
  • Hjärt-Lungfonden (20120533)
  • European Research Council
  • Seventh Framework Programme
  • Diabetesförbundet
  • Sanofi
  • Pfizer
  • Celgene
  • Vetenskapsrådet (2016-01527)
  • European Commission
  • Fondazione IRCCS Ca&apos; Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (RC100017A)
  • Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (16888)
  • Ministero della Salute (RF-2016-02364358)
  • Cancer Research UK (C18342/A23390, C9380/A18084, C9380/A26813)
  • Gilead Sciences
  • AstraZeneca
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Keywords
hepatocellular carcinoma, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, polygenic risk score, HCC risk stratification, hepatic steatosis, liver fibrosis, PNPLA3, TM6SF2, GCKR, MBOAT7, HSD17B13, genetic susceptibility, liver cirrhosis, HCC detection, UK Biobank
MeSH terms
Mediation Analysis, Cross-Sectional Studies, Europe, Female, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Humans, Liver, Liver Cirrhosis, Liver Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Risk Assessment, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Multifactorial Inheritance, Adiposity, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review