Survival of Candida auris on environmental surface materials and low-level resistance to disinfectant
Abstract
Background Candida auris persists in the environment despite disinfection. Its survival on various environmental surfaces and the effect of sublethal concentrations of disinfectants on C. auris has not been studied. Aim To investigate the survival of C. auris on environmental surfaces, and the effect of sublethal concentrations of disinfectants. Methods Surface material blocks were fabricated and artificially contaminated with C. auris. Viable counts were assessed for 3 weeks. In addition, C. auris cells were pulsed daily with disinfectants for 15 days, and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined. Ergosterol quantities and efflux pump assays were performed on disinfectant-exposed strains using standard methods. Results C. auris survived on all the surfaces for >3 weeks, with the lowest count of 2.3 log colony-forming units, regardless of wet or dry conditions. Wet wood supported the growth of C. auris (a 1 log increase), whereas dry wood inhibited this organism (both P<0.01). In the biofilm form, C. auris flourished on all surfaces. Although the MICs increased in C. auris cells pulsed with sodium dichloroisocyanurate and benzalkonium chloride, only C. auris exposed to benzalkonium chloride showed decreased ergosterol content and an activated efflux pump. Conclusions Although C. auris survived on all tested surfaces, survival on wet wood was remarkable. C. auris pulsed with benzalkonium chloride developed some degree of tolerance to disinfectant and showed efflux pump activation, suggesting the development of low-level resistance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
C. auris persistently colonizes patient skin and adheres to abiotic surfaces, creating reservoirs that enable prolonged transmission in healthcare settings.
“These outbreaks are marked by the pathogen’s ability to persistently colonize patient skin and adhere to abiotic surfaces, creating reservoirs that enable prolonged transmission within healthcare settings9–15.”
From Adhesin Als4112 promotes Candida auris skin colonization through interactions with keratinocytes and extracellular matrix proteins (2025) · cites this paper as [12]
Cites
<i>Candida auris</i> in Healthcare Facilities, New York, USA, 2013–2017
Adams, E., Quinn, M., Tsay, S., Poirot, E., Chaturvedi, S., Southwick, K., Greenko, J., Fernandez, R., Kallen, A., Vallabhaneni, S., et al. (2018) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid2410.180649 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Kean, R., Delaney, C., Sherry, L., Borman, A., Johnson, E. M., Richardson, M. D., Rautemaa-Richardson, R., Williams, C., & Ramage, G. (2018) · mSphere · doi:10.1128/msphere.00334-18 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Candida auris: Disinfectants and Implications for Infection Control
Ku, T. S. N., Walraven, C. J., & Lee, S. A. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00726 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Santana, D. J., Anku, J. A. E., Zhao, G., Zarnowski, R., Johnson, C. J., Hautau, H., Visser, N. D., Ibrahim, A. S., Andes, D., Nett, J. E., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adf8972 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Carolus, H., Sofras, D., Boccarella, G., Sephton-Clark, P., Biriukov, V., Cauldron, N. C., Lobo Romero, C., Vergauwen, R., Yazdani, S., Pierson, S., et al. (2024) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-024-01854-z · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Zhao, G., Lyu, J., Veniaminova, N. A., Zarnowski, R., Mattos, E., Johnson, C. J., Quintanilla, D., Hautau, H., Hold, L. A., Xu, B., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-60876-1 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Ume6-dependent pathways of morphogenesis and biofilm formation in <i>Candida auris</i>
Louvet, M., Li, J., Brandalise, D., Bachmann, D., Sala de Oyanguren, F., Labes, D., Jacquier, N., Genoud, C., Mucciolo, A., Coste, A. T., et al. (2024) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/spectrum.01531-24 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dire, O., Ahmad, A., Duze, S., & Patel, M.
- Affiliations
- University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
- National Health Laboratory Service (ZA)
- Corresponding author
- Patel, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Hospital Infection
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-07
- Volume
- 137
- Pages
- 17-23
- ISSN
- 0195-6701 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4367042962
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 5
- FWCI
- 16.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Hospital Infection (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Health Laboratory Service (004 94749)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Antimicrobial agents and applications
- Keywords
- Candida auris, environmental surface contamination, disinfectant resistance, biofilm, sodium dichloroisocyanurate, benzalkonium chloride, ergosterol, wood surfaces, hospital infection control
- MeSH terms
- Candida auris, Antifungal Agents, Benzalkonium Compounds, Candida, Disinfectants, Ergosterol, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review