Ume6-dependent pathways of morphogenesis and biofilm formation in Candida auris
Open accessAbstract
Candida auris is a yeast pathogen causing nosocomial outbreaks of candidemia. Its ability to adhere to inert surfaces and to be transmitted from one patient to another via medical devices is of particular concern. Like other Candida spp., C. auris has the ability to transition from the yeast form to pseudohyphae and to build biofilms. Moreover, some isolates have a unique capacity to form aggregates. These morphogenetic changes may impact virulence. In this study, we demonstrated the role of the transcription factor Ume6 in C. auris morphogenesis. Genetic hyperactivation of Ume6 induced filamentation and aggregation. The Ume6-hyperactivated strain ( UME6 HA ) also exhibited increased adhesion to inert surface and formed biofilms of higher biomass compared to the parental strain. Transcriptomic analyses of UME6 HA revealed enrichment of genes encoding for adhesins, proteins involved in cell wall organization, sterol biosynthesis, and aspartic protease activities. The three most upregulated genes compared to wild-type were those encoding for the agglutin-like sequence adhesin Als4498, the C. auris -specific adhesin Scf1, and the hypha-specific G1 cyclin-related protein Hgc1. The deletion of these genes in the UME6 HA background showed that Ume6 controls filamentation via Hgc1 and aggregation via Als4498 and Scf1. Adhesion to inert surface was essentially triggered by Scf1. However, Als4498 and Hgc1 were also crucial for biofilm formation. Our data show that Ume6 is a universal regulator of C. auris morphogenesis via distinct modulators. IMPORTANCE: C. auris represents a public health threat because of its ability to cause difficult-to-treat infections and hospital outbreaks. The morphogenetic plasticity of C. auris , including its ability to filament, to form aggregates or biofilms on inert surfaces, is important to the fungus for interhuman transmission, skin or catheter colonization, tissue invasion, antifungal resistance, and escape of the host immune system. This work deciphered the importance of Ume6 in the control of distinct pathways involved in filamentation, aggregation, adhesion, and biofilm formation of C. auris . A better understanding of the mechanisms of C. auris morphogenesis may help identify novel antifungal targets.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Ume6 hyperactivation in *Candida auris* induces filamentation, aggregation, adhesion, and thicker biofilms through distinct downstream effectors. The study maps Ume6-dependent morphogenesis to Hgc1 for pseudohyphae, Als4498 and Scf1 for aggregation, Scf1 for inert-surface adhesion, and Als4498, Scf1, and Hgc1 for biofilm formation.
Key findings
- Hyperactivated Ume6 (UME6HA) increased pseudohyphae formation from 0.9% in IV.1 to 26.0%, and increased adhesion to polystyrene microspheres from 24.8% to 67.7% (P = 0.0001).
- RNA-seq of UME6HA showed 384 upregulated and 88 downregulated genes; UME6 itself was upregulated 2,210-fold, and the top overexpressed genes included ALS4498, SCF1, and HGC1 (>100-fold).
- Deletion in UME6HA showed Ume6 controls pseudohyphae via Hgc1 (pseudohyphae 15.3% in UME6HA/hgc1Δ vs 26.0% in UME6HA), aggregation via Als4498 and Scf1, adhesion mainly via Scf1, and biofilm formation via Als4498, Scf1, and Hgc1.
- UME6HA biofilms had higher biomass and higher MBEC to amphotericin B (32–64 µg/mL vs 8–16 µg/mL) and micafungin (16–32 µg/mL vs 0.25–0.5 µg/mL), while planktonic MICs were similar; UME6HA did not show a significant virulence difference in the *Galleria mellonella* model.
Methods
- Generated ume6Δ and UME6HA strains in the *C. auris* IV.1 background using CRISPR-Cas9; UME6HA used PADH1-driven constitutive overexpression plus a C-terminal 3×HA tag.
- Performed RNA-seq with triplicate samples, GO enrichment, and GSEA against 90 published *C. auris* datasets; validated phenotypes by DIC/SEM, imaging flow cytometry, adhesion flow cytometry, crystal violet biofilm assay, confocal microscopy, antifungal susceptibility testing, and a *Galleria mellonella* virulence assay.
- Compared strains using unpaired t-tests for most assays and log-rank tests for *Galleria* survival.
Limitations
- The paper states that no gain-of-function UME6 mutations have been demonstrated in available isolate collections, that the role of Ume6 under real pathogenic conditions remains unclear, and that Ume6-independent pathways remain to be deciphered in clinical isolates.
- The paper also states that the Ume6-dependent aggregation pathway may be distinct from clade III aggregation and that further analyses are needed in aggregative clinical isolates and other clades.
- Evident from the text: Ume6 hyperactivation is artificial (PADH1 overexpression plus HA tag), transcriptomics was performed in vitro, virulence was tested only in an insect model, and several assays used limited biological replicates (e.g., technical triplicates and biological duplicates).
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
45 of 68 cited sources checked · 21 supported · 2 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Aggregating strains demonstrate higher biofilm-forming capacity.
“Aggregation seems to play an important role in C. auris biofilm formation, since aggregating strains demonstrated higher biofilm-forming capacity, which was associated with distinct transcriptomic profiles compared to the non-aggregative strains (13, 23, 25, 57).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 4 sources checked- cites [13] Sherry L, Ramage G, Kean R, Borman A, Johnson EM, Richardson MD, Rautemaa-Richardson R. 2017. Biofilm-forming capability of highly virulent, multidrug-resistant Candida auris. Emerg Infect Dis 23: 328– 331. doi: 10.3201/eid2302.161320 28098553 PMC5324806 source
In The Study (page not provided), the two nonaggregative C. auris strains had biofilm biomass 2.4 and 1.5 times less than C. albicans, while the two aggregative strains had biomass 3.0 and 3.1 times less. The measured aggregative strains therefore formed less biofilm, not more, than the nonaggregative strains. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [23] Singh R, Kaur M, Chakrabarti A, Shankarnarayan SA, Rudramurthy SM. 2019. Biofilm formation by Candida auris isolated from colonising sites and candidemia cases. Mycoses 62: 706– 709. doi: 10.1111/myc.12947 31132181 source
- cites [25] Brown JL, Delaney C, Short B, Butcher MC, McKloud E, Williams C, Kean R, Ramage G. 2020. Candida auris phenotypic heterogeneity determines pathogenicity in vitro. mSphere 5. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00371-20 PMC7316489 32581078 source
The Results (Fig. 1; page not provided) say aggregating isolates tended to form biofilms with greater biomass at 4 and 24 hours, but the group comparisons were not statistically significant. The Results (Fig. 2) also report distinct transcriptomic profiles for one aggregating and one nonaggregating isolate. The claim presents the biomass trend as a demonstrated general difference without that qualification. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [57] Short B, Brown J, Delaney C, Sherry L, Williams C, Ramage G, Kean R. 2019. Candida auris exhibits resilient biofilm characteristics in vitro: implications for environmental persistence. J Hosp Infect 103: 92– 96. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2019.06.006 31226270 source
- Findingown data
GSEA shows significant overlap between UME6HA upregulated genes and genes upregulated by the in vivo yeast to filament transition.
“As shown in Fig. S3, the resulting network of data sets showed significant overlap with RNAseq profiles of genes upregulated by the in vivo yeast to filament transition [node “FILAMENT VS YEAST_UP” (20)].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Yue H, Bing J, Zheng Q, Zhang Y, Hu T, Du H, Wang H, Huang G. 2018. Filamentation in Candida auris, an emerging fungal pathogen of humans: passage through the mammalian body induces a heritable phenotypic switch. Emerg Microbes Infect 7: 188. doi: 10.1038/s41426-018-0187-x 30482894 PMC6258701 source
- Findingown data
Adhesion to inert surface in UME6HA is essentially triggered by Scf1.
“Adhesion to inert surface was essentially triggered by Scf1.”
- Also stated in: § Ume6 controls adhesion to inert surface via Scf1, but Als4498 and Hgc1 are also crucial for biofilm formation · boosted
“These data confirm the crucial role of Scf1 in adhesion to inert surfaces as recently described (27, 40).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [27] Santana DJ, Anku JAE, Zhao G, Zarnowski R, Johnson CJ, Hautau H, Visser ND, Ibrahim AS, Andes D, Nett JE, Singh S, O’Meara TR. 2023. A Candida auris-specific adhesin, Scf1, governs surface association, colonization, and virulence. Science 381: 1461– 1467. doi: 10.1126/science.adf8972 37769084 PMC11235122 source
The section “Polymer surface attachment by the adhesin SCF1” reports that deleting SCF1 substantially reduced C. auris adhesion to polystyrene microspheres and restoring it rescued adhesion. That supports Scf1’s role in attachment to an inert surface, but the cited passages do not establish the claim specifically in UME6HA. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [40] Wang TW, Sofras D, Montelongo-Jauregui D, Paiva TO, Carolus H, Dufrêne YF, Alfaifi AA, McCracken C, Bruno VM, Van Dijck P, Jabra-Rizk MA. 2024. Functional redundancy in Candida auris cell surface adhesins crucial for cell-cell interaction and aggregation. bioRxiv: 2024.03.21.586120. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.21.586120 PMC11511831 39455573 source
The Results section on in vitro biofilm formation reports that deleting SCF1 significantly reduced biofilm formation, while deleting ALS4112 did not; the Methods specify polystyrene plates. This supports a role for Scf1 in biofilm formation on an inert surface, but does not establish that Scf1 essentially triggers initial surface adhesion or show this in UME6HA. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Also stated in: § Ume6 controls adhesion to inert surface via Scf1, but Als4498 and Hgc1 are also crucial for biofilm formation · boosted
- Interpretationcitation
Scf1 plays a crucial role in adhesion to inert surfaces.
“These data confirm the crucial role of Scf1 in adhesion to inert surfaces as recently described (27, 40).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [27] Santana DJ, Anku JAE, Zhao G, Zarnowski R, Johnson CJ, Hautau H, Visser ND, Ibrahim AS, Andes D, Nett JE, Singh S, O’Meara TR. 2023. A Candida auris-specific adhesin, Scf1, governs surface association, colonization, and virulence. Science 381: 1461– 1467. doi: 10.1126/science.adf8972 37769084 PMC11235122 source
- cites [40] Wang TW, Sofras D, Montelongo-Jauregui D, Paiva TO, Carolus H, Dufrêne YF, Alfaifi AA, McCracken C, Bruno VM, Van Dijck P, Jabra-Rizk MA. 2024. Functional redundancy in Candida auris cell surface adhesins crucial for cell-cell interaction and aggregation. bioRxiv: 2024.03.21.586120. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.21.586120 PMC11511831 39455573 source
The Results section on in vitro biofilm formation reports that deleting SCF1 significantly reduced biofilm formation, and the Methods specify that these assays used polystyrene plates. The Discussion also reports sparse Δscf1 biofilms in catheters. These findings support a role for Scf1 in biofilms on inert surfaces, but the paper identifies its adhesion mechanism as cell–cell adherence; it does not establish that Scf1 is crucial for direct adhesion to the inert surface itself. The indexed copy provides no page numbers for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Non-aggregative variants are more virulent than aggregative variants in Galleria models.
“Non-aggregative variants were more virulent than aggregative variants in Galleria models (17, 24, 43, 46, 48).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim4 of 5 sources checked- cites [17] Borman AM, Szekely A, Johnson EM. 2016. Comparative pathogenicity of United Kingdom isolates of the emerging pathogen Candida auris and other key pathogenic Candida species. mSphere 1: e00189-16. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00189-16 27547827 PMC4990711 source
- cites [24] Bing J, Guan Z, Zheng T, Zhang Z, Fan S, Ennis CL, Nobile CJ, Huang G. 2023. Clinical isolates of Candida auris with enhanced adherence and biofilm formation due to genomic amplification of ALS4. PLoS Pathog 19: e1011239. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011239 36913408 PMC10035925 source
- cites [43] Fan S, Yue H, Zheng Q, Bing J, Tian S, Chen J, Ennis CL, Nobile CJ, Huang G, Du H. 2021. Filamentous growth is a general feature of Candida auris clinical isolates. Med Mycol 59: 734– 740. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myaa116 33485272 PMC8257410 source
- cites [46] Garcia-Bustos V, Pemán J, Ruiz-Gaitán A, Cabañero-Navalon MD, Cabanilles-Boronat A, Fernández-Calduch M, Marcilla-Barreda L, Sigona-Giangreco IA, Salavert M, Tormo-Mas MÁ, Ruiz-Saurí A. 2022. Host-pathogen interactions upon Candida auris infection: fungal behaviour and immune response in Galleria mellonella. Emerg Microbes Infect 11: 136– 146. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2021.2017756 34890523 PMC8725852 source
- cites [48] Garcia-Bustos V, Ruiz-Saurí A, Ruiz-Gaitán A, Sigona-Giangreco IA, Cabañero-Navalon MD, Sabalza-Baztán O, Salavert-Lletí M, Tormo MÁ, Pemán J. 2021. Characterization of the differential pathogenicity of Candida auris in a Galleria mellonella infection model. Microbiol Spectr 9: e0001321. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00013-21 34106570 PMC8552516 source
- Premisecitation
Addition of a 3 HA tag to the C-terminal domain of zinc cluster transcription factors is efficient for their artificial activation in C. albicans and C. auris.
“The addition of a 3 HA tag to the C-terminal domain of zinc cluster transcription factors was shown to be efficient for their artificial activation in C. albicans and C. auris, presumably by relieving an activation domain from repression by an inhibitory domain (32–35).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 4 sources checked- cites [32] Li J, Aubry L, Brandalise D, Coste AT, Sanglard D, Lamoth F. 2024. Upc2-mediated mechanisms of azole resistance in Candida auris. Microbiol Spectr. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03526-23 PMC10845950 38206035 source
The Materials and Methods section describes C-terminal 3xHA tagging as part of a hyperactivation system for zinc cluster transcription factors in C. auris, and the Results report its use for Upc2, Tac1b, and Mrr1. The paper cites earlier work for the method but does not itself establish its effectiveness in C. albicans or explain activation as relief of repression by an inhibitory domain. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [33] Schillig R, Morschhäuser J. 2013. Analysis of a fungus-specific transcription factor family, the Candida albicans zinc cluster proteins, by artificial activation. Mol Microbiol 89: 1003– 1017. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12327 23844834 source
- cites [34] Schubert S, Barker KS, Znaidi S, Schneider S, Dierolf F, Dunkel N, Aïd M, Boucher G, Rogers PD, Raymond M, Morschhäuser J. 2011. Regulation of efflux pump expression and drug resistance by the transcription factors Mrr1, Upc2, and Cap1 in Candida albicans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55: 2212– 2223. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01343-10 21402859 PMC3088179 source
The Results (page not provided) show that a C-terminal 3×HA tag activated Mrr1 in C. albicans and report a similar activating effect for Upc2; they suggest that the tag unmasks an activation domain. The paper does not establish that tagging efficiently activates zinc cluster transcription factors generally, and it provides no evidence for C. auris. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [35] Znaidi S, Weber S, Al-Abdin OZ, Bomme P, Saidane S, Drouin S, Lemieux S, De Deken X, Robert F, Raymond M. 2008. Genomewide location analysis of Candida albicans Upc2p, a regulator of sterol metabolism and azole drug resistance. Eukaryot Cell 7: 836– 847. doi: 10.1128/EC.00070-08 18390649 PMC2394978 source
- Premisecitation
Deletion of ALS4112 in an aggregative clade I isolate results in an aggregation defect.
“Deletion of ALS4112 in an aggregative clade I isolate resulted in aggregation defect (40).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] Wang TW, Sofras D, Montelongo-Jauregui D, Paiva TO, Carolus H, Dufrêne YF, Alfaifi AA, McCracken C, Bruno VM, Van Dijck P, Jabra-Rizk MA. 2024. Functional redundancy in Candida auris cell surface adhesins crucial for cell-cell interaction and aggregation. bioRxiv: 2024.03.21.586120. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.21.586120 PMC11511831 39455573 source
- Findingown data
No relevant change of expression was observed among genes involved in the cAMP/PKA pathway following Ume6 hyperactivation.
“While Kim et al. demonstrated a key role of the cyclic adenosine monophosphate/protein kinase A (cAMP/PKA) pathway in the filamentation of C. auris (47), we observed no relevant change of expression among genes involved in this pathway (CYR1, BCY1, TPK1, TPK2) following Ume6 hyperactivation (File S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] Kim JS, Lee KT, Lee MH, Cheong E, Bahn YS. 2021. Adenylyl cyclase and protein kinase a play redundant and distinct roles in growth, differentiation, antifungal drug resistance, and pathogenicity of Candida auris. mBio 12: e0272921. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02729-21 34663094 PMC8524339 source
- Premisecitation
In clade III, the adhesin Als4112 plays a key role in aggregation via copy number variation.
“In clade III, the adhesin Als4112 (SBP28_005090/B9J08_004112) was shown to play a key role in aggregation via copy number variation (24, 49).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [24] Bing J, Guan Z, Zheng T, Zhang Z, Fan S, Ennis CL, Nobile CJ, Huang G. 2023. Clinical isolates of Candida auris with enhanced adherence and biofilm formation due to genomic amplification of ALS4. PLoS Pathog 19: e1011239. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011239 36913408 PMC10035925 source
- cites [49] Pelletier C, Shaw S, Alsayegh S, Brown AJP, Lorenz A. 2024. Candida auris undergoes adhesin-dependent and -independent cellular aggregation. PLoS Pathog 20: e1012076. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1012076 38466738 PMC10957086 source
The Results section (‘Als4112 is necessary for aggregation’; page not provided) shows that disrupting ALS4112 prevented media-induced aggregation in a clade III strain and that adding the gene back restored it. The Discussion proposes copy-number variation as an explanation, drawing on an earlier study, but does not establish it as the mechanism in the strain tested; ALS4112 was not required for echinocandin-induced clustering. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Scf1 plays a crucial role in adhesion and biofilm formation.
“The crucial role of Scf1 in adhesion and biofilm formation has been recently demonstrated (27, 40).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [27] Santana DJ, Anku JAE, Zhao G, Zarnowski R, Johnson CJ, Hautau H, Visser ND, Ibrahim AS, Andes D, Nett JE, Singh S, O’Meara TR. 2023. A Candida auris-specific adhesin, Scf1, governs surface association, colonization, and virulence. Science 381: 1461– 1467. doi: 10.1126/science.adf8972 37769084 PMC11235122 source
- cites [40] Wang TW, Sofras D, Montelongo-Jauregui D, Paiva TO, Carolus H, Dufrêne YF, Alfaifi AA, McCracken C, Bruno VM, Van Dijck P, Jabra-Rizk MA. 2024. Functional redundancy in Candida auris cell surface adhesins crucial for cell-cell interaction and aggregation. bioRxiv: 2024.03.21.586120. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.21.586120 PMC11511831 39455573 source
- Findingown data
Transcriptomic analysis of UME6HA reveals enrichment of genes encoding adhesins, proteins involved in cell wall organization, sterol biosynthesis, and aspartic protease activities.
“Transcriptomic analyses of UME6HA revealed enrichment of genes encoding for adhesins, proteins involved in cell wall organization, sterol biosynthesis, and aspartic protease activities.”
- Also stated in: § Transcriptional profile resulting from Ume6 hyperactivation · plain
“Gene Ontology analysis (File S2) revealed an enrichment in gene products located to cell wall and involved in cell wall organization (e.g., adhesins), sterol biosynthesis, and aspartic protease activities (Fig. 3A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Transcriptional profile resulting from Ume6 hyperactivation · plain
- Findingown data
UME6 is upregulated 2,210-fold in UME6HA compared to IV.1.
“This analysis confirmed the successful upregulation of UME6 (SBP28_002473/B9J08_000592) in UME6HA (2,210-fold compared to IV.1) (File S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Genetic hyperactivation of Ume6 induces aggregation in C. auris.
“Genetic hyperactivation of Ume6 induced filamentation and aggregation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
46 genes are commonly upregulated between yeast to filament transition and UME6HA.
“The enrichment plot based on this node (Fig. 4) showed that 46 genes (listed in File S3) were commonly upregulated between yeast to filament transition and UME6HA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
GO analysis of upregulated genes reveals enrichment in cell wall, sterol biosynthesis, and aspartic protease activities.
“Gene Ontology analysis (File S2) revealed an enrichment in gene products located to cell wall and involved in cell wall organization (e.g., adhesins), sterol biosynthesis, and aspartic protease activities (Fig. 3A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Als4498 and Hgc1 are also crucial for biofilm formation in UME6HA.
“However, Als4498 and Hgc1 were also crucial for biofilm formation.”
- Also stated in: § Ume6 controls adhesion to inert surface via Scf1, but Als4498 and Hgc1 are also crucial for biofilm formation · plain
“The deletion of ALS4498, SCF1, and HGC1 in UME6HA all resulted in a significant decrease in biofilm formation, which was more pronounced in UME6HA/als4498Δ (Fig. 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Ume6 controls adhesion to inert surface via Scf1, but Als4498 and Hgc1 are also crucial for biofilm formation · plain
- Findingown data
The Ume6-hyperactivated strain UME6HA exhibits increased adhesion to inert surface compared to the parental strain IV.1.
“The Ume6-hyperactivated strain (UME6HA) also exhibited increased adhesion to inert surface and formed biofilms of higher biomass compared to the parental strain.”
- Also stated in: § Ume6 controls adhesion to inert surface via Scf1, but Als4498 and Hgc1 are also crucial for biofilm formation · boosted
“However, UME6HA exhibited a significantly higher percentage of adhesion to microspheres compared to IV.1 (67.7% vs 24.8%, respectively, P = 0.0001) (Fig. 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Ume6 controls adhesion to inert surface via Scf1, but Als4498 and Hgc1 are also crucial for biofilm formation · boosted
- Findingown data
UME6HA forms biofilms of higher biomass compared to the parental strain IV.1.
“The Ume6-hyperactivated strain (UME6HA) also exhibited increased adhesion to inert surface and formed biofilms of higher biomass compared to the parental strain.”
- Also stated in: § Ume6 controls adhesion to inert surface via Scf1, but Als4498 and Hgc1 are also crucial for biofilm formation · plain
“However, the biomass of adherent cells was significantly higher in UME6HA compared to IV.1 (Fig. 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Ume6 controls adhesion to inert surface via Scf1, but Als4498 and Hgc1 are also crucial for biofilm formation · plain
- Findingown data
The three most upregulated genes in UME6HA compared to wild-type are ALS4498, SCF1, and HGC1.
“The three most upregulated genes compared to wild-type were those encoding for the agglutin-like sequence adhesin Als4498, the C. auris-specific adhesin Scf1, and the hypha-specific G1 cyclin-related protein Hgc1.”
- Also stated in: § Transcriptional profile resulting from Ume6 hyperactivation · plain
“Based on these results, we decided to further investigate the link between Ume6 and the three genes exhibiting the highest overexpression in UME6HA (>100-fold change): the agglutinin-like sequence (ALS) adhesin SBP28_004635/B9J08_004498 (further referred as ALS4498 according to the nomenclature proposed by Santana et al.) (27), the C. auris-specific adhesin SBP28_003606/B9J08_001458 (surface colon”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Transcriptional profile resulting from Ume6 hyperactivation · plain
- Findingown data
UME6HA has a higher proportion of cells measuring 5-10 μm, 10-15 μm, or >15 μm compared to IV.1.
“Measurement of cell length (i.e., maximal diameter) by image flow cytometry showed a higher proportion of cells measuring between 5–10 µm, 10–15 µm, or >15 µm in UME6HA compared to IV.1 (Fig. S2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The UME6HA strain displays an altered morphological aspect of the colony with irregular and wrinkled borders.
“Despite the absence of growth defect, the UME6HA strain displayed an altered morphological aspect of the colony with irregular and wrinkled borders (Fig. 1A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
GO term enrichment of downregulated genes is principally involved in ribosome biogenesis.
“GO term enrichment of downregulated genes was principally involved in ribosome biogenesis (Fig. 3B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Both Scf1 and Hgc1 play a role in biofilm formation of UME6HA.
“In addition, both Scf1 and Hgc1 were found to play a role in biofilm formation of UME6HA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Biofilm formation is similar between ume6Δ and IV.1.
“Biofilm formation was similar between ume6Δ and IV1 (Fig. S1C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No difference in adhesion percentage was observed between ume6Δ and IV.1.
“No difference in adhesion percentage was observed between ume6Δ and IV.1 (Fig. S1B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The thick biofilm resulting from Ume6 hyperactivation is more resistant to amphotericin B and micafungin.
“Finally, the thick biofilm resulting from Ume6 hyperactivation was more resistant to amphotericin B and micafungin (two antifungal drugs with anti-biofilm activity), which might have clinical implications for the treatment of catheter-related infections.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The density and thickness of the biofilm is significantly decreased in UME6HA/als4498Δ, UME6HA/scf1Δ, and UME6HA/hgc1Δ compared to UME6HA.
“However, the density and thickness of the biofilm was significantly decreased in UME6HA/als4498Δ, UME6HA/scf1Δ, and UME6HA/hgc1Δ compared to UME6HA (Fig. 7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
MICs of fluconazole, amphotericin B, and micafungin are similar for IV.1 and UME6HA (4 μg/mL, 2 μg/mL, and 0.25 μg/mL, respectively).
“According to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) protocol (41), minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of fluconazole, amphotericin B, and micafungin were similar for IV.1 and UME6HA (4 µg/mL, 2 µg/mL, and 0.25 µg/mL, respectively).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [41] 2017. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts, M27. 4th ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
UME6HA exhibits a significantly higher percentage of adhesion to microspheres compared to IV.1 (67.7% vs 24.8%, P = 0.0001).
“However, UME6HA exhibited a significantly higher percentage of adhesion to microspheres compared to IV.1 (67.7% vs 24.8%, respectively, P = 0.0001) (Fig. 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The biomass of adherent cells is significantly higher in UME6HA compared to IV.1.
“However, the biomass of adherent cells was significantly higher in UME6HA compared to IV.1 (Fig. 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Deletion of ALS4498, SCF1, and HGC1 in the IV.1 strain does not result in any growth defect or morphological alteration.
“The deletion of ALS4498, SCF1, and HGC1 in the IV.1 strain did not result in any growth defect or morphological alteration (Fig. S4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
UME6HA produces a denser and thicker biofilm compared to IV.1.
“Analysis by confocal microscopy showed that UME6HA produced a denser and thicker biofilm compared to IV.1 (Fig. 7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
UME6HA and IV.1 infections do not show any significant difference in survival in both experiments.
“The comparison between UME6HA and IV.1 infections did not show any significant difference in terms of survival in both experiments (Fig. 8A and B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Ume6 hyperactivation increases antifungal resistance in biofilm conditions.
“Ume6 hyperactivation increases antifungal resistance in biofilm conditions”
- Also stated in: § Ume6 hyperactivation increases antifungal resistance in biofilm conditions · boosted
“These results show that the biofilm resulting from Ume6 hyperactivation is resistant to biofilm-active antifungal drugs (e.g., amphotericin B, micafungin), in particular to micafungin.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Ume6 hyperactivation increases antifungal resistance in biofilm conditions · boosted
- Findingown data
GSEA confirms overlaps with a significantly higher number of genes commonly regulated by Ume6 and these transcriptional studies.
“The GSEA analysis presented here confirmed these overlaps with a significant higher number of genes commonly regulated by Ume6 and these transcriptional studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ALS4112 exhibits a modest increase of expression (twofold) following Ume6 hyperactivation.
“In our transcriptomic analysis, ALS4112 exhibited a modest increase of expression (twofold) following Ume6 hyperactivation (File S1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
No increased expression of UME6 was found in an aggregative clade III isolate compared to the non-aggregative IV.1 strain.
“Interestingly, we did not find increased expression of UME6 in an aggregative clade III isolate (compared to the non-aggregative IV.1 strain, data not shown).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Ume6 triggered aggregation mainly via two adhesins, Als4498 and Scf1.
“We found here that Ume6 triggered aggregation mainly via two other adhesins, Als4498 and Scf1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Ume6 controls filamentation via Hgc1.
“The deletion of these genes in the UME6HA background showed that Ume6 controls filamentation via Hgc1 and aggregation via Als4498 and Scf1.”
- Also stated in: § Ume6 controls aggregation via Als4498 and Scf1 and pseudohyphae formation via Hgc1 · plain
“While its impact on aggregation is mediated via Als4498 and Scf1, its role in pseudofilamentation is mediated via Hgc1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Ume6 controls aggregation via Als4498 and Scf1 and pseudohyphae formation via Hgc1 · plain
- Interpretationown data
Ume6 plays a role in Candida auris morphogenesis.
“In this study, we demonstrated the role of the transcription factor Ume6 in C. auris morphogenesis.”
- Also stated in: § Conclusions · boosted
“The present work demonstrated the role of the transcription factor Ume6 in C. auris morphogenesis with distinct pathways in filamentation, aggregation, adhesion, and biofilm formation (Fig. 9).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Conclusions · boosted
- Interpretationown data
Ume6 controls aggregation via Als4498 and Scf1.
“The deletion of these genes in the UME6HA background showed that Ume6 controls filamentation via Hgc1 and aggregation via Als4498 and Scf1.”
- Also stated in: § Ume6 controls aggregation via Als4498 and Scf1 and pseudohyphae formation via Hgc1 · plain
“While its impact on aggregation is mediated via Als4498 and Scf1, its role in pseudofilamentation is mediated via Hgc1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Ume6 controls aggregation via Als4498 and Scf1 and pseudohyphae formation via Hgc1 · plain
- Interpretationown data
Ume6 is a universal regulator of C. auris morphogenesis via distinct modulators.
“Our data show that Ume6 is a universal regulator of C. auris morphogenesis via distinct modulators.”
- Also stated in: § Conclusions · boosted
“The present work demonstrated the role of the transcription factor Ume6 in C. auris morphogenesis with distinct pathways in filamentation, aggregation, adhesion, and biofilm formation (Fig. 9).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Conclusions · boosted
- Interpretationown data
Ume6 controls processes regulating growth and proliferation.
“These results suggest that Ume6 controls processes regulating growth and proliferation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The Ume6-dependent pathway of aggregation described here may be distinct from that observed among clade III isolates.
“We, therefore, conclude that the Ume6-dependent pathway of aggregation described here may be distinct from that observed among clade III isolates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Ume6 can induce filamentation via transcriptional activation of HGC1.
“While Ume6 can induce filamentation via transcriptional activation of HGC1, its actual role in C. auris morphogenesis under real pathogenic conditions remains unclear.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Ume6 is not essential for virulence in a Galleria model of invasive candidiasis.
“Ume6 is not essential for virulence in a Galleria model of invasive candidiasis”
- Also stated in: § Ume6 is not essential for virulence in a Galleria model of invasive candidiasis · hedged
“These results suggest that Ume6, despite its important role in C. auris morphogenesis, does not play a major role in virulence in the Galleria model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Ume6 is not essential for virulence in a Galleria model of invasive candidiasis · hedged
- Interpretationown data
The biofilm resulting from Ume6 hyperactivation is resistant to biofilm-active antifungal drugs, namely amphotericin B and micafungin, in particular to micafungin.
“These results show that the biofilm resulting from Ume6 hyperactivation is resistant to biofilm-active antifungal drugs (e.g., amphotericin B, micafungin), in particular to micafungin.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The actual role of Ume6 in C. auris morphogenesis under real pathogenic conditions remains unclear.
“While Ume6 can induce filamentation via transcriptional activation of HGC1, its actual role in C. auris morphogenesis under real pathogenic conditions remains unclear.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Ume6 triggers biofilm formation of C. auris via different mechanisms involving all three downstream effectors Als4498, Scf1, and Hgc1.
“These results show that Ume6 triggers biofilm formation of C. auris via different mechanisms involving all three downstream effectors (Als4498, Scf1, Hgc1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Mechanisms of filamentation in C. auris involve different pathways in response to different stress conditions.
“We, therefore, conclude that mechanisms of filamentation in C. auris involve different pathways in response to different stress conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Ume6 does not play a major role in virulence in the Galleria mellonella model.
“These results suggest that Ume6, despite its important role in C. auris morphogenesis, does not play a major role in virulence in the Galleria model.”
- Also stated in: § Conclusions · plain
“Moreover, while Ume6 was shown to play a role in C. albicans virulence (28, 42), we could not reproduce this impact in an insect model of C. auris infection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [28] Banerjee M, Thompson DS, Lazzell A, Carlisle PL, Pierce C, Monteagudo C, López-Ribot JL, Kadosh D. 2008. UME6, a novel filament-specific regulator of Candida albicans hyphal extension and virulence. Mol Biol Cell 19: 1354– 1365. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e07-11-1110 18216277 PMC2291399 source
- cites [42] Carlisle PL, Banerjee M, Lazzell A, Monteagudo C, López-Ribot JL, Kadosh D. 2009. Expression levels of a filament-specific transcriptional regulator are sufficient to determine Candida albicans morphology and virulence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 599– 604. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804061106 19116272 PMC2626749 source
- Also stated in: § Conclusions · plain
- May combine two claims. 32
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 21
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSome genes expressed in C. albicans hyphal phase have no orthologs in C. auris or no significant change of expression in different conditions inducing C. auris filamentation.
“Moreover, some genes expressed in C. albicans hyphal phase have no orthologs in C. auris (e.g., ECE1, HWP1) or no significant change of expression in different conditions inducing C. auris filamentation (e.g., FLO8, EFG1, BRG1, BCR1, EFH1), suggesting distinct pathways between these genotypically distant Candida spp. (20, 37, 47).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [20] Yue H, Bing J, Zheng Q, Zhang Y, Hu T, Du H, Wang H, Huang G. 2018. Filamentation in Candida auris, an emerging fungal pathogen of humans: passage through the mammalian body induces a heritable phenotypic switch. Emerg Microbes Infect 7: 188. doi: 10.1038/s41426-018-0187-x 30482894 PMC6258701 source
The Results section (page not available) says FLO8 was upregulated and EFG1 was downregulated in filamentous C. auris cells, contrary to the claim that they showed no significant expression change. The retrieved passages do not establish whether ECE1 or HWP1 lack C. auris orthologs. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [37] Kim SH, Iyer KR, Pardeshi L, Muñoz JF, Robbins N, Cuomo CA, Wong KH, Cowen LE. 2019. Genetic analysis of Candida auris implicates Hsp90 in morphogenesis and azole tolerance and Cdr1 in azole resistance. mBio 10: e02529-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02529-18 30696744 PMC6355988 source
The Results section (page unavailable) states that C. auris lacks orthologs of HWP1 and ECE1. It also reports that, under Hsp90 inhibition and depletion, its differentially expressed filamentous-growth genes did not overlap with the known C. albicans regulators examined. The copy does not establish the stated expression result for each of FLO8, EFG1, BRG1, BCR1 and EFH1 across different conditions that induce C. auris filamentation. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [47] Kim JS, Lee KT, Lee MH, Cheong E, Bahn YS. 2021. Adenylyl cyclase and protein kinase a play redundant and distinct roles in growth, differentiation, antifungal drug resistance, and pathogenicity of Candida auris. mBio 12: e0272921. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02729-21 34663094 PMC8524339 source
In Results, under “The role of the cAMP/PKA signaling pathway in the morphological transition of C. auris” (Fig. 2C; page not provided), EFG1 was unaffected by hydroxyurea in nearly all strains, and FLO8 was not induced in the wild type. The paper does not establish that ECE1 or HWP1 lack C. auris orthologs or report expression results for BRG1, BCR1, or EFH1. It tests one filamentation-inducing condition, hydroxyurea, and reports increased FLO8 expression in several mutant strains, so it does not support the broader claim about no change across different conditions. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The quote only partly states this claim.
InterpretationreasoningConditions favoring the filamentous phase of C. auris, such as blood contact and Hsp90 deprivation, share upregulated genes with UME6HA.
“Together with other data sets containing genes upregulated in contact with blood cells [node “BLOOD_60 MIN_UP” (36)] and genes upregulated by deprivation of Hsp90 [node “HSP90_TET_UP”, (37)], these conditions have in common that they favor the filamentous phase of C. auris, which is consistent with the morphological effect of UME6HA on C. auris.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [36] Allert S, Schulz D, Kämmer P, Großmann P, Wolf T, Schäuble S, Panagiotou G, Brunke S, Hube B. 2022. From environmental adaptation to host survival: attributes that mediate pathogenicity of Candida auris. Virulence 13: 191– 214. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2022.2026037 35142597 PMC8837256 source
The Results section on whole-blood infection reports genes upregulated in C. auris at 60 minutes, supporting use of this paper for the blood-response gene set. But the Results section on fungal survival says no switch to hyphal growth was detected in blood, and our copy does not assess overlap with UME6HA-upregulated genes. The separate Hsp90-deprivation data set is cited to another source in the sentence. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [37] Kim SH, Iyer KR, Pardeshi L, Muñoz JF, Robbins N, Cuomo CA, Wong KH, Cowen LE. 2019. Genetic analysis of Candida auris implicates Hsp90 in morphogenesis and azole tolerance and Cdr1 in azole resistance. mBio 10: e02529-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02529-18 30696744 PMC6355988 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAggregation is mainly observed among clade III isolates but has also been reported in other clades.
“Aggregation has been mainly observed among clade III isolates but has also been reported in other clades and can be induced under some in vitro or in vivo conditions (18, 49–51).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 4 sources checked- cites [18] Szekely A, Borman AM, Johnson EM. 2019. Candida auris isolates of the Southern Asian and South African lineages exhibit different phenotypic and antifungal susceptibility profiles in vitro. J Clin Microbiol 57: e02055-18. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02055-18 30867237 PMC6498034 source
- cites [49] Pelletier C, Shaw S, Alsayegh S, Brown AJP, Lorenz A. 2024. Candida auris undergoes adhesin-dependent and -independent cellular aggregation. PLoS Pathog 20: e1012076. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1012076 38466738 PMC10957086 source
- cites [50] Bing J, Guan Z, Zheng T, Ennis CL, Nobile CJ, Chen C, Chu H, Huang G. 2024. Rapid evolution of an adaptive multicellular morphology of Candida auris during systemic infection. Nat Commun 15: 2381. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-46786-8 38493178 PMC10944540 source
The Results section on genetic mutations reports aggregative mutants derived from parental strains of different genetic clades, supporting occurrence beyond a single clade. The Results section on aggregate formation also describes testing strains spanning the four major clades. Neither passage says aggregation is mainly observed among clade III isolates, so the claimed predominance is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [51] Forgács L, Borman AM, Prépost E, Tóth Z, Kardos G, Kovács R, Szekely A, Nagy F, Kovacs I, Majoros L. 2020. Comparison of in vivo pathogenicity of four Candida auris clades in a neutropenic bloodstream infection murine model. Emerg Microbes Infect 9: 1160– 1169. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1771218 32486923 PMC7448943 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationUme6 is a key regulator of the switch from yeast to hyphal form and of biofilm formation in Candida albicans.
“Because the zinc cluster transcription factor Ume6 is known to be a key regulator of the switch from yeast to hyphal form and of biofilm formation in C. albicans (28–31), we explored its role in C. auris.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 4 sources checked- cites [28] Banerjee M, Thompson DS, Lazzell A, Carlisle PL, Pierce C, Monteagudo C, López-Ribot JL, Kadosh D. 2008. UME6, a novel filament-specific regulator of Candida albicans hyphal extension and virulence. Mol Biol Cell 19: 1354– 1365. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e07-11-1110 18216277 PMC2291399 source
- cites [29] Banerjee M, Uppuluri P, Zhao XR, Carlisle PL, Vipulanandan G, Villar CC, López-Ribot JL, Kadosh D. 2013. Expression of UME6, a key regulator of Candida albicans hyphal development, enhances biofilm formation via Hgc1- and Sun41-dependent mechanisms. Eukaryot Cell 12: 224– 232. doi: 10.1128/EC.00163-12 23223035 PMC3571304 source
- cites [30] Fan Y, He H, Dong Y, Pan H. 2013. Hyphae-specific genes HGC1, ALS3, HWP1, and ECE1 and relevant signaling pathways in Candida albicans. Mycopathologia 176: 329– 335. doi: 10.1007/s11046-013-9684-6 24002103 source
- cites [31] Uppuluri P, Chaturvedi AK, Srinivasan A, Banerjee M, Ramasubramaniam AK, Köhler JR, Kadosh D, Lopez-Ribot JL. 2010. Dispersion as an important step in the Candida albicans biofilm developmental cycle. PLoS Pathog 6: e1000828. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000828 20360962 PMC2847914 source
The Results section identifies UME6 as a regulator important for C. albicans hyphal extension and shows that changing its expression changes biofilm morphology. The paper demonstrates effects on biofilm architecture and dispersion, but does not establish UME6 as a key regulator of biofilm formation itself. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBiofilm formation is a complex process; adhesion to living or inert surfaces represents the first stage, and other steps are required including morphogenetic changes, proliferation, and maturation.
“Biofilm formation is a complex process. While adhesion to living or inert surfaces represents the first stage, other steps are required including morphogenetic changes, proliferation, and maturation (14).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] Malinovská Z, Čonková E, Váczi P. 2023. Biofilm formation in medically important Candida species. J Fungi (Basel) 9: 955. doi: 10.3390/jof9100955 37888211 PMC10607155 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPHR1 is upregulated following Hsp90 repression/inhibition, along with SCF1 and other genes of cell surface proteins exhibiting increased expression in UME6HA.
“PHR1 was also upregulated following Hsp90 repression/inhibition, along with SCF1 and other genes of cell surface proteins exhibiting increased expression in UME6HA (PGA26, RBT4/KRE1) (37).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] Kim SH, Iyer KR, Pardeshi L, Muñoz JF, Robbins N, Cuomo CA, Wong KH, Cowen LE. 2019. Genetic analysis of Candida auris implicates Hsp90 in morphogenesis and azole tolerance and Cdr1 in azole resistance. mBio 10: e02529-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02529-18 30696744 PMC6355988 source
The Results section (page not available) reports that PHR1, PGA26, RBT1, and KRE1 were upregulated during C. auris filamentation associated with Hsp90 perturbation. It does not establish that PHR1 increased under both Hsp90 repression and inhibition, and the passages do not support the additional claims about SCF1 or increased expression in UME6HA. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationC. auris displays at least three Als-like, eight Hyr/Iff-like, and one species-specific adhesin (Scf1).
“C. auris displays at least three Als-like, eight Hyr/Iff-like, and one species-specific adhesin (Scf1) (27, 53–55) (Table S3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 4 sources checked- cites [27] Santana DJ, Anku JAE, Zhao G, Zarnowski R, Johnson CJ, Hautau H, Visser ND, Ibrahim AS, Andes D, Nett JE, Singh S, O’Meara TR. 2023. A Candida auris-specific adhesin, Scf1, governs surface association, colonization, and virulence. Science 381: 1461– 1467. doi: 10.1126/science.adf8972 37769084 PMC11235122 source
In “Polymer surface attachment by the adhesin SCF1” (page not specified), the paper reports twelve genes homologous to the ALS and IFF/HYR adhesin families, but does not give the claimed breakdown of at least three Als-like and eight Hyr/Iff-like genes. The Discussion calls SCF1 a C. auris-specific adhesin; the “adhesive plasticity” section qualifies this by identifying an SCF1 homolog in C. haemulonii and describing reliance on SCF1 for adhesion as specific to C. auris. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [53] Muñoz JF, Welsh RM, Shea T, Batra D, Gade L, Howard D, Rowe LA, Meis JF, Litvintseva AP, Cuomo CA. 2021. Clade-specific chromosomal rearrangements and loss of subtelomeric adhesins in Candida auris. Genetics 218: iyab029. doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyab029 33769478 PMC8128392 source
The Results section on depleted Hyr/Iff proteins reports eight Hyr/Iff proteins in C. auris. The Discussion identifies several Als-like genes, but the copy does not establish a count of at least three distinct ones. No passage found identifies Scf1 as a species-specific adhesin; the species-specific candidate family discussed in Results is also found in closely related species. Page numbers were not available in the indexed copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [54] Singh S, Uppuluri P, Mamouei Z, Alqarihi A, Elhassan H, French S, Lockhart SR, Chiller T, Edwards JE, Ibrahim AS. 2019. The NDV-3A vaccine protects mice from multidrug resistant Candida auris infection. PLoS Pathog 15: e1007460. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007460 31381597 PMC6695204 source
The Results section (‘C. auris possesses homologs of C. albicans Als3’; page unavailable) identifies three C. auris proteins homologous to Als3p, supporting the Als-like count. The cited paper does not establish the claimed eight Hyr/Iff-like adhesins or the species-specific adhesin Scf1; those parts of the sentence are not supported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [55] Smoak RA, Snyder LF, Fassler JS, He BZ. 2023. Parallel expansion and divergence of an adhesin family in pathogenic yeasts. Genetics 223: iyad024. doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyad024 36794645 PMC10319987 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFilamentation is an important virulence trait of C. albicans, but its pathogenic role in C. auris is less obvious.
“While filamentation is an important virulence trait of C. albicans, its pathogenic role in C. auris is less obvious (20, 43, 46).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [20] Yue H, Bing J, Zheng Q, Zhang Y, Hu T, Du H, Wang H, Huang G. 2018. Filamentation in Candida auris, an emerging fungal pathogen of humans: passage through the mammalian body induces a heritable phenotypic switch. Emerg Microbes Infect 7: 188. doi: 10.1038/s41426-018-0187-x 30482894 PMC6258701 source
- cites [43] Fan S, Yue H, Zheng Q, Bing J, Tian S, Chen J, Ennis CL, Nobile CJ, Huang G, Du H. 2021. Filamentous growth is a general feature of Candida auris clinical isolates. Med Mycol 59: 734– 740. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myaa116 33485272 PMC8257410 source
- cites [46] Garcia-Bustos V, Pemán J, Ruiz-Gaitán A, Cabañero-Navalon MD, Cabanilles-Boronat A, Fernández-Calduch M, Marcilla-Barreda L, Sigona-Giangreco IA, Salavert M, Tormo-Mas MÁ, Ruiz-Saurí A. 2022. Host-pathogen interactions upon Candida auris infection: fungal behaviour and immune response in Galleria mellonella. Emerg Microbes Infect 11: 136– 146. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2021.2017756 34890523 PMC8725852 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe gating strategy shown in Fig. S27 was used to separate the cells of interest from out-of-focus cells, debris, and clumps.
“The gating strategy shown in Fig. S27 was used to separate the cells of interest from the out-of-focus cells, debris, and clumps, as previously reported (64).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [64] McMahon CL, Esqueda M, Yu JJ, Wall G, Romo JA, Vila T, Chaturvedi A, Lopez-Ribot JL, Wormley F, Hung CY. 2023. Development of an imaging flow cytometry method for fungal cytological profiling and its potential application in antifungal drug development. J Fungi (Basel) 9: 722. doi: 10.3390/jof9070722 37504711 PMC10381375 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFilamentation of C. auris has a limited impact on virulence, while aggregation has been associated with decreased virulence.
“This is in line with previous observations showing that filamentation of C. auris has a limited impact on virulence, while aggregation has been associated with decreased virulence (17, 46).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [17] Borman AM, Szekely A, Johnson EM. 2016. Comparative pathogenicity of United Kingdom isolates of the emerging pathogen Candida auris and other key pathogenic Candida species. mSphere 1: e00189-16. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00189-16 27547827 PMC4990711 source
The Results and Discussion report that C. auris was highly virulent in Galleria mellonella larvae despite showing no significant filamentation, and that nonaggregating strains were significantly more virulent than aggregate-forming strains (Fig. 4). These observations support the association described, but the paper did not directly test the effect of filamentation on virulence or establish that the findings extend beyond the larval model. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [46] Garcia-Bustos V, Pemán J, Ruiz-Gaitán A, Cabañero-Navalon MD, Cabanilles-Boronat A, Fernández-Calduch M, Marcilla-Barreda L, Sigona-Giangreco IA, Salavert M, Tormo-Mas MÁ, Ruiz-Saurí A. 2022. Host-pathogen interactions upon Candida auris infection: fungal behaviour and immune response in Galleria mellonella. Emerg Microbes Infect 11: 136– 146. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2021.2017756 34890523 PMC8725852 source
The Discussion describes aggregative C. auris phenotypes as less virulent and observes that they tend to form more pseudohyphae. It says filamentation *might not* be a major pathogenic determinant and *does not seem* as decisive as previously assumed; the claim presents its limited impact on virulence more definitively. Page numbers are not supplied in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationUME6 is significantly overexpressed in some in vitro filament-inducing conditions but not in vivo after passage through the mammalian body.
“Regarding C. auris UME6, significant overexpression of this gene was found in some in vitro filament-inducing conditions (e.g., hydroxyurea treatment) but not in vivo after passage through the mammalian body (20, 47).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [20] Yue H, Bing J, Zheng Q, Zhang Y, Hu T, Du H, Wang H, Huang G. 2018. Filamentation in Candida auris, an emerging fungal pathogen of humans: passage through the mammalian body induces a heritable phenotypic switch. Emerg Microbes Infect 7: 188. doi: 10.1038/s41426-018-0187-x 30482894 PMC6258701 source
The Results section on global gene expression profiles reports differences between yeast and filamentous cells recovered after mammalian passage, but does not identify UME6 or establish its expression level. Searches of our copy for UME6, hydroxyurea treatment, and expression after mammalian passage found no passage addressing the claimed comparison. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [47] Kim JS, Lee KT, Lee MH, Cheong E, Bahn YS. 2021. Adenylyl cyclase and protein kinase a play redundant and distinct roles in growth, differentiation, antifungal drug resistance, and pathogenicity of Candida auris. mBio 12: e0272921. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02729-21 34663094 PMC8524339 source
The Results section on morphological transition reports that hydroxyurea treatment significantly enhanced UME6 expression in wild-type C. auris. The paper mentions filamentous growth after passage through the mammalian body, but does not report UME6 expression after that passage; its murine virulence study does not establish the claimed lack of overexpression in vivo. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSome C. auris adhesins are upregulated in biofilm conditions.
“Some of these adhesins were shown to be upregulated in biofilm conditions (26).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Kean R, Delaney C, Sherry L, Borman A, Johnson EM, Richardson MD, Rautemaa-Richardson R, Williams C, Ramage G. 2018. Transcriptome assembly and profiling of Candida auris reveals novel insights into biofilm-mediated resistance. mSphere 3. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00334-18 PMC6041501 29997121 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationHA tagging of the Ume6 protein was verified by Western blot using a HA tag monoclonal antibody.
“HA tagging of the Ume6 protein was verified by Western blot using a HA tag monoclonal antibody (Invitrogen, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), as previously described (Fig. S26) (32).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Li J, Aubry L, Brandalise D, Coste AT, Sanglard D, Lamoth F. 2024. Upc2-mediated mechanisms of azole resistance in Candida auris. Microbiol Spectr. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03526-23 PMC10845950 38206035 source
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationGenes involved in filamentous growth (HGC1, DDR48, PHR1) are upregulated in UME6HA and in the filamentous phenotype of C. auris following passage through the mammalian body.
“For instance, genes involved in filamentous growth (HGC1, DDR48, PHR1) were upregulated in UME6HA and in the filamentous phenotype of C. auris following passage through the mammalian body (20).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Yue H, Bing J, Zheng Q, Zhang Y, Hu T, Du H, Wang H, Huang G. 2018. Filamentation in Candida auris, an emerging fungal pathogen of humans: passage through the mammalian body induces a heritable phenotypic switch. Emerg Microbes Infect 7: 188. doi: 10.1038/s41426-018-0187-x 30482894 PMC6258701 source
The Results section on global gene expression reports that HGC1 was upregulated in filamentous C. auris cells, and the Results section on mammalian passage reports that passage through mice triggered a filamentous phenotype (page numbers unavailable). Our copy does not report upregulation of DDR48 or PHR1, or mention UME6HA; searches for those terms found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn C. albicans, Als1 is important for adhesion.
“In C. albicans, Als1 was found to be important for adhesion (56).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [56] Nobile CJ, Fox EP, Nett JE, Sorrells TR, Mitrovich QM, Hernday AD, Tuch BB, Andes DR, Johnson AD. 2012. A recently evolved transcriptional network controls biofilm development in Candida albicans. Cell 148: 126– 138. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.048 22265407 PMC3266547 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationScf1 is unique to C. auris and has a different adhesion mechanism compared to other adhesins.
“Scf1 is unique to C. auris and has a different adhesion mechanism compared to other adhesins (27).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Santana DJ, Anku JAE, Zhao G, Zarnowski R, Johnson CJ, Hautau H, Visser ND, Ibrahim AS, Andes D, Nett JE, Singh S, O’Meara TR. 2023. A Candida auris-specific adhesin, Scf1, governs surface association, colonization, and virulence. Science 381: 1461– 1467. doi: 10.1126/science.adf8972 37769084 PMC11235122 source
The section “SCF1 and IFF4109 have distinct nonspecific mechanisms” reports that Scf1-mediated adhesion is not dependent on hydrophobicity, supporting the mechanism comparison. However, “C. auris relies on SCF1 for adhesive plasticity” identifies a functional SCF1 homolog in C. haemulonii. Reliance on SCF1 for adhesion is specific to C. auris, but Scf1 itself is not unique to that species. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe proportions of non-budding, budding, and pseudohyphae cells are 52.1%, 47.0%, and 0.9% for IV.1 and 17.1%, 56.9%, and 26.0% for UME6HA, respectively.
“The proportions of non-budding cells, budding cells, and pseudohyphae were 52.1%, 47.0%, and 0.9% for IV.1 and 17.1%, 56.9%, and 26.0% for UME6HA, respectively (Fig. 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNo growth defect or phenotypic alteration was observed in the ume6Δ strain.
“No growth defect or phenotypic alteration was observed in the ume6Δ strain (Fig. S1A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataUME6HA exhibits significantly higher expression of 384 genes and lower expression of 88 genes compared to IV.1.
“UME6HA exhibited significantly higher expression (i.e., ≥2-fold increase and P-value ≤ 0.05 compared to IV.1) and lower expression (i.e., ≥ 2-fold decrease and P-value ≤ 0.05 compared to IV.1) of 384 and 88 genes, respectively (File S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataGenetic hyperactivation of Ume6 induces filamentation or pseudohyphae formation in C. auris.
“Genetic hyperactivation of Ume6 induced filamentation and aggregation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCompared to UME6HA, adhesion is significantly decreased in UME6HA/scf1Δ and slightly increased in UME6HA/als4498Δ, while it is similar in UME6HA/hgc1Δ.
“Compared to UME6HA, adhesion was significantly decreased in UME6HA/scf1Δ and slightly increased in UME6HA/als4498Δ, while it was similar in UME6HA/hgc1Δ (Fig. 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn biofilm conditions, UME6HA exhibits similar MBEC50 to fluconazole compared to IV.1 (16 μg/mL), but higher MBEC to amphotericin B (32-64 μg/mL vs 8-16 μg/mL) and micafungin (16-32 μg/mL vs 0.25-0.5 μg/mL).
“In biofilm conditions, UME6HA exhibited similar minimal biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC50) to fluconazole compared to IV.1 (16 µg/mL), but higher MBEC to amphotericin B (32–64 µg/mL vs 8–16 µg/mL) and micafungin (16–32 µg/mL vs 0.25–0.5 µg/mL).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDeletion of ALS4498, SCF1, and HGC1 in UME6HA all results in a significant decrease in biofilm formation, which is more pronounced in UME6HA/als4498Δ.
“The deletion of ALS4498, SCF1, and HGC1 in UME6HA all resulted in a significant decrease in biofilm formation, which was more pronounced in UME6HA/als4498Δ (Fig. 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAggregation in UME6HA is still present in UME6HA/hgc1Δ but not in UME6HA/als4498Δ and UME6HA/scf1Δ.
“By DIC microscopy and SEM, the aggregation observed in UME6HA was still present in UME6HA/hgc1Δ but not in UME6HA/als4498Δ and UME6HA/scf1Δ (Fig. 1B and C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCompared to UME6HA, UME6HA/als4498Δ and UME6HA/scf1Δ exhibit a higher proportion of longer pseudohyphae (>10 μm), while this proportion is lower in UME6HA/hgc1Δ.
“When compared to UME6HA, UME6HA/als4498Δ, and UME6HA/scf1Δ exhibited a higher proportion of longer pseudohyphae (>10 µm), while this proportion was lower in UME6HA/hgc1Δ (Fig. S2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe UME6HA colony morphology with irregular and wrinkled borders is conserved in UME6HA/scf1Δ but not in UME6HA/als4498Δ and UME6HA/hgc1Δ.
“The morphological aspect of the UME6HA colony with irregular and wrinkled borders on solid agar was conserved in UME6HA/scf1Δ but not in UME6HA/als4498Δ and UME6HA/hgc1Δ (Fig. 1A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the first experiment, larvae infected with ume6Δ showed a modest but significant decrease in survival compared to IV.1, which was not reproduced in the second experiment.
“We observed a modest, but significant, decrease of survival among larvae infected with ume6Δ compared to those infected with IV.1 in the first experiment (Fig. 8A), which was not reproduced in the second experiment (no significant difference, Fig. 8B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPseudohyphae formation in UME6HA is conserved in UME6HA/als4498Δ and UME6HA/scf1Δ, while it is abolished in UME6HA/hgc1Δ.
“The ability of UME6HA to form pseudohyphae was conserved in UME6HA/als4498Δ and UME6HA/scf1Δ, while it was abolished in UME6HA/hgc1Δ (Fig. 1B and C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCompared to UME6HA, the proportion of pseudohyphae is higher in UME6HA/scf1Δ (41.6% vs 26.0%) and UME6HA/als4498Δ (34.0% vs 26.0%), while it is lower in UME6HA/hgc1Δ (15.3% vs 26.0%).
“Compared to UME6HA, the proportion of pseudohyphae was higher in UME6HA/scf1Δ (41.6% vs 26.0%) and UME6HA/als4498Δ (34.0% vs 26.0%), while it was lower in UME6HA/hgc1Δ (15.3% vs 26.0%) (Fig. 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAls4498 has a predominant role in biofilm formation, but not in adhesion to inert surfaces.
“Interestingly, we found that Als4498 had a predominant role in biofilm formation, but not in adhesion to inert surfaces.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFollowing Ume6 hyperactivation, ALS4498 and SCF1 are drastically overexpressed (>1,000-fold) and HYR3 and IFF9 are overexpressed (10- to 100-fold).
“Following Ume6 hyperactivation, we observed a drastic overexpression of ALS4498 and SCF1 (>1,000-fold) and, to a lesser extent, of HYR3 and IFF9 (10- to 100-fold), which suggests that these genes can be under the direct control of Ume6.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataALS4498, SCF1, HYR3, and IFF9 can be under the direct control of Ume6.
“Following Ume6 hyperactivation, we observed a drastic overexpression of ALS4498 and SCF1 (>1,000-fold) and, to a lesser extent, of HYR3 and IFF9 (10- to 100-fold), which suggests that these genes can be under the direct control of Ume6.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningHgc1 contributes to biofilm formation, possibly by promoting filamentation at the proliferation stage.
“Hgc1 also contributes to biofilm formation, possibly by promoting filamentation at the proliferation stage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAls4498 is important in biofilm formation by promoting intercellular adhesion and aggregation rather than adhesion to the inert surface.
“Therefore, we postulate that Als4498 is important in biofilm formation by promoting intercellular adhesion and aggregation rather than adhesion to the inert surface, as this later mainly relies on Scf1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataUme6 operates via distinct pathways in the control of morphogenesis in C. auris: aggregation via Als4498 and Scf1, and pseudofilamentation via Hgc1.
“These results suggest that Ume6 operates via distinct pathways in the control of morphogenesis in C. auris. While its impact on aggregation is mediated via Als4498 and Scf1, its role in pseudofilamentation is mediated via Hgc1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationC. auris biofilms are distinct from C. albicans biofilms and usually consist of yeast cells with a low amount of extracellular matrix.
“C. auris biofilms are distinct from that of C. albicans and usually consist of yeast cells with a low amount of extracellular matrix (12).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Khari A, Biswas B, Gangwar G, Thakur A, Puria R. 2023. Candida auris biofilm: a review on model to mechanism conservation. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 21: 295– 308. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2023.2179036 36755419 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAdhesion to fluorescent polystyrene microspheres as a readout for adhesion to hydrophobic surfaces can be analyzed by flow cytometry.
“Adhesion to fluorescent polystyrene microspheres as a readout for adhesion to hydrophobic surfaces can be analyzed by flow cytometry as described previously (61).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [61] Silva-Dias A, Miranda IM, Rocha R, Monteiro-Soares M, Salvador A, Rodrigues AG, Pina-Vaz C. 2012. A novel flow cytometric protocol for assessment of yeast cell adhesion. Cytometry A 81: 265– 270. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.21170 22076919 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataIntegration of the constructs was verified by PCR.
“Integration of the constructs was verified by PCR (Fig. S12 to S25).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenData were acquired for at least 25,000 events per sample.
“Data were acquired for at least 25,000 events/sample.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenEvents with a bright-field area >1 μm2 and non-saturating pixels were collected to exclude cell debris.
“Events with a bright-field area >1 µm² (to exclude cell debris) and non-saturating pixels (Raw max pixel values below 4,096) were collected.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe crystal violet biofilm experiment was performed in technical triplicates and biological duplicates for each strain.
“The experiment was performed in technical triplicates and biological duplicates for each strain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationUme6 was shown to play a role in C. albicans virulence.
“Moreover, while Ume6 was shown to play a role in C. albicans virulence (28, 42), we could not reproduce this impact in an insect model of C. auris infection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [28] Banerjee M, Thompson DS, Lazzell A, Carlisle PL, Pierce C, Monteagudo C, López-Ribot JL, Kadosh D. 2008. UME6, a novel filament-specific regulator of Candida albicans hyphal extension and virulence. Mol Biol Cell 19: 1354– 1365. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e07-11-1110 18216277 PMC2291399 source
- cites [42] Carlisle PL, Banerjee M, Lazzell A, Monteagudo C, López-Ribot JL, Kadosh D. 2009. Expression levels of a filament-specific transcriptional regulator are sufficient to determine Candida albicans morphology and virulence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 599– 604. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804061106 19116272 PMC2626749 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationMICs in planktonic conditions were determined according to the CLSI protocol.
“MICs in planktonic conditions were determined according to the CLSI protocol (41).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [41] 2017. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts, M27. 4th ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn the flow cytometry protocol, microspheres act as a surface to which yeast cells can adhere, enabling their quantification.
“In this protocol, microspheres act as a surface to which yeast cells can adhere enabling their quantification.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [61] Silva-Dias A, Miranda IM, Rocha R, Monteiro-Soares M, Salvador A, Rodrigues AG, Pina-Vaz C. 2012. A novel flow cytometric protocol for assessment of yeast cell adhesion. Cytometry A 81: 265– 270. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.21170 22076919 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationSingle color controls for each fluorochrome were acquired to generate the compensation matrix that was applied to each sample prior to analysis.
“Single color controls for each fluorochrome were acquired to generate the compensation matrix that was applied to each sample prior to analysis (63).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [63] Ortyn WE, Hall BE, George TC, Frost K, Basiji DA, Perry DJ, Zimmerman CA, Coder D, Morrissey PJ. 2006. Sensitivity measurement and compensation in spectral imaging. Cytometry A 69: 852– 862. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.20306 16969805 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAntifungal susceptibility testing was performed in biological duplicates and validated if results were similar (± one dilution).
“Testing was performed in biological duplicates and validated if results were similar (± one dilution).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataRNA quality was assessed on a Fragment Analyzer with RNA quality numbers between 8.3 and 8.6.
“RNA quality was assessed on Fragment Analyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) with RNA quality numbers between 8.3 and 8.6.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenSamples were prepared in triplicates for each strain.
“Samples were prepared in triplicates for each strain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationMBECs in biofilm conditions were assessed by the XTT reduction assay as previously described, with minor modifications.
“MBECs in biofilm conditions were assessed by the tetrazolium salt (XTT) reduction assay as previously described (66, 67), with minor modifications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [66] Melo AS, Bizerra FC, Freymüller E, Arthington-Skaggs BA, Colombo AL. 2011. Biofilm production and evaluation of antifungal susceptibility amongst clinical Candida spp. isolates, including strains of the Candida parapsilosis complex. Med Mycol 49: 253– 262. doi: 10.3109/13693786.2010.530032 21039308 source
- cites [67] Nett JE, Cain MT, Crawford K, Andes DR. 2011. Optimizing a Candida biofilm microtiter plate model for measurement of antifungal susceptibility by tetrazolium salt assay. J Clin Microbiol 49: 1426– 1433. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02273-10 21227984 PMC3122839 source
The paper relies on this without support.
Transcription factors regulating morphogenesis are still unexplored in Candida auris.
“However, transcription factors regulating morphogenesis are still unexplored in C. auris.”
The paper relies on this without support.
DyeCycle Green Stain uptake identifies nucleated cells.
“Cells were delineated based on the uptake of DyeCycle Green Stain, which identifies nucleated cells, characterized by their emission within the green fluorescence spectrum (λem ≈ 488 nm).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Fluorescent microspheres' red fluorescence emission indicates bead binding to yeast cells.
“Following initial gating on DyeCycle Green-positive events, cells were further analyzed for adherence to fluorescent microspheres characterized by their emission within the red fluorescence spectrum (λem ≈ 645 nm) indicating bead binding.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Certain Candida species can transition from yeast forms to filamentous structures, producing true hyphae in species like C. albicans, C. dubliniensis, and C. tropicalis, or pseudohyphae in species such as C. auris and C. parapsilosis.
“Certain Candida species can transition from yeast forms to filamentous structures, producing true hyphae in species like C. albicans, C. dubliniensis, and C. tropicalis, or pseudohyphae in species such as C. auris and C. parapsilosis96–98.”
From Distinct echinocandin responses of Candida albicans and Candida auris cell walls revealed by solid-state NMR (2025) · cites this paper as [98]
The Introduction and Discussion (page numbers unavailable) describe C. auris transitioning to pseudohyphae and refer to true hyphae of C. albicans. The copy does not substantiate the claimed morphology of C. dubliniensis, C. tropicalis, or C. parapsilosis. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Aspect-ratio definition conflicts with classification thresholds
MinorA major/minor axis ratio cannot be less than 1, yet the figure caption assigns budding cells ratios of 0.5-0.8 and pseudohyphae ratios below 0.5. The stated ratio definition and classification thresholds cannot both be correct.
“classified according to their aspect ratio (i.e., major/minor axis ratio, y-axis)”
““budding” (ratio 0.5–0.8, red square), or “pseudohyphae (ratio <0.5, green square).”
Pseudohyphae persist despite being described as abolished
MinorThe paper says deleting HGC1 abolished pseudohyphae formation in UME6HA, but its imaging flow cytometry results report 15.3% pseudohyphae in that strain. The measured proportion is lower, not zero.
“while it was abolished in UME6HA/hgc1Δ (Fig. 1B and C).”
“while it was lower in UME6HA/hgc1Δ (15.3% vs 26.0%) (Fig. 2).”
Cites
Lockhart, S. R., Etienne, K. A., Vallabhaneni, S., Farooqi, J., Chowdhary, A., Govender, N. P., Colombo, A. L., Calvo, B., Cuomo, C. A., Desjardins, C. A., et al. (2017) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciw691 · Cited by 1,662 · see citing works
First hospital outbreak of the globally emerging Candida auris in a European hospital
Schelenz, S., Hagen, F., Rhodes, J. L., Abdolrasouli, A., Chowdhary, A., Hall, A., Ryan, L., Shackleton, J., Trimlett, R., Meis, J. F., et al. (2016) · Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control · doi:10.1186/s13756-016-0132-5 · Cited by 768 · see citing works
A Recently Evolved Transcriptional Network Controls Biofilm Development in Candida albicans
Nobile, C. J., Fox, E. P., Nett, J. E., Sorrells, T. R., Mitrovich, Q. M., Hernday, A. D., Tuch, B. B., Andes, D. R., & Johnson, A. D. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.048 · Cited by 711 · see citing works
A <i>Candida auris</i> Outbreak and Its Control in an Intensive Care Setting
Eyre, D. W., Sheppard, A. E., Madder, H., Moir, I., Moroney, R., Quan, T. P., Griffiths, D., George, S., Butcher, L., Morgan, M., et al. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1714373 · Cited by 517 · see citing works
Welsh, R. M., Bentz, M. L., Shams, A., Houston, H., Lyons, A., Rose, L. J., & Litvintseva, A. P. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.00921-17 · Cited by 499 · see citing works
Dispersion as an Important Step in the Candida albicans Biofilm Developmental Cycle
Uppuluri, P., Chaturvedi, A. K., Srinivasan, A., Banerjee, M., Ramasubramaniam, A. K., Köhler, J. R., Kadosh, D., & Lopez-Ribot, J. L. (2010) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000828 · Cited by 432 · see citing works
Cellular Image Analysis and Imaging by Flow Cytometry
Basiji, D. A., Ortyn, W. E., Liang, L., Vidya Venkatachalam, A., & Morrissey, P. (2007) · Clinics in Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.cll.2007.05.008 · Cited by 427 · see citing works
Biofilm-Forming Capability of Highly Virulent, Multidrug-Resistant <i>Candida auris</i>
Sherry, L., Ramage, G., Kean, R., Borman, A., Johnson, E. M., Richardson, M. D., & Rautemaa-Richardson, R. (2017) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid2302.161320 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
Ruiz‐Gaitán, A., Moret, A. M., Tasias‐Pitarch, M., Aleixandre‐López, A. I., Martínez‐Morel, H., Calabuig, E., Salavert‐Lletí, M., Ramírez, P., López‐Hontangas, J. L., Hagen, F., et al. (2018) · Mycoses · doi:10.1111/myc.12781 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
Borman, A. M., Szekely, A., & Johnson, E. M. (2016) · mSphere · doi:10.1128/msphere.00189-16 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Zheng, X., Wang, Y.-M., & Wang, Y. (2004) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600195 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
Global epidemiology of emerging Candida auris
Rhodes, J., & Fisher, M. C. (2019) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2019.05.008 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
VEuPathDB: the eukaryotic pathogen, vector and host bioinformatics resource center in 2023
Álvarez-Jarreta, J., Amos, B., Aurrecoechea, C., Bah, S. Y., Barba, M., Barreto, A., Basenko, E. Y., Belnap, R., Blevins, A. S., Böhme, U., et al. (2023) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1003 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Banerjee, M., Thompson, D. S., Lazzell, A., Carlisle, P. L., Pierce, C., Monteagudo, C., López-Ribot, J. L., & Kadosh, D. (2008) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e07-11-1110 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Rajendran, R., Sherry, L., Nile, C. J., Sherriff, A., Johnson, E. M., Hanson, M. F., Williams, C., Munro, C. A., Jones, B. J., & Ramage, G. (2016) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2015.09.018 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Piedrahita, C. T., Cadnum, J. L., Jencson, A. L., Shaikh, A., Ghannoum, M. A., & Donskey, C. J. (2017) · Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology · doi:10.1017/ice.2017.127 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Kean, R., Delaney, C., Sherry, L., Borman, A., Johnson, E. M., Richardson, M. D., Rautemaa-Richardson, R., Williams, C., & Ramage, G. (2018) · mSphere · doi:10.1128/msphere.00334-18 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Carlisle, P. L., Banerjee, M., Lazzell, A., Monteagudo, C., López-Ribot, J. L., & Kadosh, D. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0804061106 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Tumbarello, M., Fiori, B., Trecarichi, E. M., Posteraro, P., Losito, A. R., Luca, A. D., Sanguinetti, M., Fadda, G., Cauda, R., & Posteraro, B. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033705 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
The first isolate of <i>Candida auris</i> in China: clinical and biological aspects
Wang, X., Bing, J., Zheng, Q., Zhang, F., Liu, J., Yue, H., Tao, L., Du, H., Wang, Y., Wang, H., et al. (2018) · Emerging Microbes & Infections · doi:10.1038/s41426-018-0095-0 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Yue, H., Bing, J., Zheng, Q., Zhang, Y., Hu, T., Du, H., Wang, H., & Huang, G. (2018) · Emerging Microbes & Infections · doi:10.1038/s41426-018-0187-x · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Melo, A. S., Bizerra, F. C., Freymüller, E., Arthington-Skaggs, B. A., & Colombo, A. L. (2011) · Medical Mycology · doi:10.3109/13693786.2010.530032 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Biofilm formation in medically important Candida species
Malinovská, Z., Čonková, E., & Váczi, P. (2023) · Journal of Fungi · doi:10.3390/jof9100955 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
The NDV-3A vaccine protects mice from multidrug resistant Candida auris infection
Singh, S., Uppuluri, P., Mamouei, Z., Alqarihi, A., Elhassan, H., French, S., Lockhart, S. R., Chiller, T., Edwards, J. E., & Ibrahim, A. S. (2019) · PLOS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1007460 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Candida auris Forms High-Burden Biofilms in Skin Niche Conditions and on Porcine Skin
Horton, M. V., Johnson, C. J., Kernien, J. F., Patel, T. D., Lam, B. C., Cheong, J. Z. A., Meudt, J. J., Shanmuganayagam, D., Kalan, L. R., & Nett, J. E. (2020) · mSphere · doi:10.1128/msphere.00910-19 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Nett, J. E., Cain, M. T., Crawford, K., & Andes, D. R. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.02273-10 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Liu, F., Hu, Z.-D., Zhao, X.-M., Zhao, W.-N., Feng, Z.-X., Yurkov, A., Alwasel, S., Boekhout, T., Bensch, K., Hui, F.-L., et al. (2024) · Persoonia - Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi · doi:10.3767/persoonia.2024.52.02 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Santana, D. J., Anku, J. A. E., Zhao, G., Zarnowski, R., Johnson, C. J., Hautau, H., Visser, N. D., Ibrahim, A. S., Andes, D., Nett, J. E., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adf8972 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Kim, S. H., Iyer, K. R., Pardeshi, L., Muñoz, J. F., Robbins, N., Cuomo, C. A., Wong, K. H., & Cowen, L. E. (2019) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.02529-18 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Schubert, S., Barker, K. S., Znaidi, S., Schneider, S., Dierolf, F., Dunkel, N., Aïd, M., Boucher, G., Rogers, P. D., Raymond, M., et al. (2011) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.01343-10 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Szekely, A., Borman, A. M., & Johnson, E. M. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.02055-18 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Clade-specific chromosomal rearrangements and loss of subtelomeric adhesins in <i>Candida auris</i>
Muñoz, J. F., Welsh, R. M., Shea, T., Batra, D., Gade, L., Howard, D., Rowe, L. A., Meis, J. F., Litvintseva, A. P., & Cuomo, C. A. (2021) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/iyab029 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Znaidi, S., Weber, S., Zin Al-Abdin, O., Bomme, P., Saidane, S., Drouin, S., Lemieux, S., De Deken, X., Robert, F., & Raymond, M. (2008) · Eukaryotic Cell · doi:10.1128/ec.00070-08 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Sensitivity measurement and compensation in spectral imaging
Ortyn, W. E., Hall, B. E., George, T. C., Frost, K., Basiji, D. A., Perry, D. J., Zimmerman, C. A., Coder, D., & Morrissey, P. J. (2006) · Cytometry Part A · doi:10.1002/cyto.a.20306 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Forgács, L., Borman, A. M., Prépost, E., Tóth, Z., Kardos, G., Kovács, R., Szekely, A., Nagy, F., Kovacs, I., & Majoros, L. (2020) · Emerging Microbes & Infections · doi:10.1080/22221751.2020.1771218 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Bravo Ruiz, G., Ross, Z. K., Gow, N. A. R., & Lorenz, A. (2020) · mSphere · doi:10.1128/msphere.00151-20 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
The Candida auris Alert: Facts and Perspectives
Lamoth, F., & Kontoyiannis, D. P. (2017) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/infdis/jix597 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Self-citationHyphae-specific genes HGC1, ALS3, HWP1, and ECE1 and relevant signaling pathways in Candida albicans
Fan, Y., He, H., Dong, Y., & Pan, H. (2013) · Mycopathologia · doi:10.1007/s11046-013-9684-6 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Santana, D. J., & O’Meara, T. R. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27545-5 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Banerjee, M., Uppuluri, P., Zhao, X. R., Carlisle, P. L., Vipulanandan, G., Villar, C. C., López-Ribot, J. L., & Kadosh, D. (2013) · Eukaryotic Cell · doi:10.1128/ec.00163-12 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Short, B., Brown, J., Delaney, C., Sherry, L., Williams, C., Ramage, G., & Kean, R. (2019) · Journal of Hospital Infection · doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2019.06.006 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Biofilm formation by <i>Candida auris</i> isolated from colonising sites and candidemia cases
Singh, R., Kaur, M., Chakrabarti, A., Shankarnarayan, S. A., & Rudramurthy, S. M. (2019) · Mycoses · doi:10.1111/myc.12947 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Schillig, R., & Morschhäuser, J. (2013) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/mmi.12327 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Bing, J., Guan, Z., Zheng, T., Zhang, Z., Fan, S., Ennis, C. L., Nobile, C. J., & Huang, G. (2023) · PLOS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1011239 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Dire, O., Ahmad, A., Duze, S., & Patel, M. (2023) · Journal of Hospital Infection · doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2023.04.007 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Candida auris Phenotypic Heterogeneity Determines Pathogenicity <i>In Vitro</i>
Brown, J. L., Delaney, C., Short, B., Butcher, M. C., McKloud, E., Williams, C., Kean, R., & Ramage, G. (2020) · mSphere · doi:10.1128/msphere.00371-20 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
LncRNA DINOR is a virulence factor and global regulator of stress responses in Candida auris
Gao, J., Chow, E. W. L., Wang, H., Xu, X., Cai, C., Song, Y., Wang, J., & Wang, Y. (2021) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-021-00915-x · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Rapid evolution of an adaptive multicellular morphology of Candida auris during systemic infection
Bing, J., Guan, Z., Zheng, T., Ennis, C. L., Nobile, C. J., Chen, C., Chu, H., & Huang, G. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-46786-8 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Garcia-Bustos, V., Ruiz-Saurí, A., Ruiz-Gaitán, A., Sigona-Giangreco, I. A., Cabañero-Navalon, M. D., Sabalza-Baztán, O., Salavert-Lletí, M., Tormo, M. Á., & Pemán, J. (2021) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/spectrum.00013-21 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Allert, S., Schulz, D., Kämmer, P., Großmann, P., Wolf, T., Schäuble, S., Panagiotou, G., Brunke, S., & Hube, B. (2022) · Virulence · doi:10.1080/21505594.2022.2026037 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Linking Cellular Morphogenesis with Antifungal Treatment and Susceptibility in Candida Pathogens
Sharma, J., Rosiana, S., Razzaq, I., & Shapiro, R. S. (2019) · Journal of Fungi · doi:10.3390/jof5010017 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Hernando-Ortiz, A., Mateo, E., Perez-Rodriguez, A., de Groot, P. W. J., Quindós, G., & Eraso, E. (2021) · Virulence · doi:10.1080/21505594.2021.1908765 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Filamentous growth is a general feature of <i>Candida auris</i> clinical isolates
Fan, S., Yue, H., Zheng, Q., Bing, J., Tian, S., Chen, J., Ennis, C. L., Nobile, C. J., Huang, G., & Du, H. (2021) · Medical Mycology · doi:10.1093/mmy/myaa116 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Kim, J.-S., Lee, K.-T., Lee, M. H., Cheong, E., & Bahn, Y.-S. (2021) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.02729-21 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Nicotine is a risk factor for dental caries: An in vivo study
Liu, S., Wu, T., Zhou, X., et al. (2018) · Journal of Dental Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jds.2017.09.006 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Wang, T. W., Sofras, D., Montelongo-Jauregui, D., Paiva, T. O., Carolus, H., Dufrêne, Y. F., Alfaifi, A. A., McCracken, C., Bruno, V. M., Van Dijck, P., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-53588-5 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Single-tube classical PCR for Candida auris and Candida haemulonii identification
Theill, L., Dudiuk, C., Morales-López, S. E., Berrío, I., Rodríguez, J. Y., Marín, A., Gamarra, S. P., & García‐Effrón, G. (2018) · Revista Iberoamericana de Micología · doi:10.1016/j.riam.2018.01.003 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Candida auris undergoes adhesin-dependent and -independent cellular aggregation
Pelletier, C., Shaw, S., Alsayegh, S., Brown, A. J. P., & Lorenz, A. (2024) · PLOS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1012076 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Upc2-mediated mechanisms of azole resistance in <i>Candida auris</i>
Li, J., Aubry, L., Brandalise, D., Coste, A. T., Sanglard, D., & Lamoth, F. (2024) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/spectrum.03526-23 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationGarcia-Bustos, V., Pemán, J., Ruiz-Gaitán, A., Cabañero-Navalon, M. D., Cabanilles-Boronat, A., Fernández-Calduch, M., Marcilla-Barreda, L., Sigona-Giangreco, I. A., Salavert, M., Tormo-Mas, M. Á., et al. (2022) · Emerging Microbes & Infections · doi:10.1080/22221751.2021.2017756 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Parallel expansion and divergence of an adhesin family in pathogenic yeasts
Smoak, R. A., Snyder, L. F., Fassler, J. S., & He, B. Z. (2023) · GENETICS · doi:10.1093/genetics/iyad024 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
A novel flow cytometric protocol for assessment of yeast cell adhesion
Silva‐Dias, A., Miranda, I. M., Rocha, R., Monteiro‐Soares, M., Salvador, A., Rodrigues, A. G., & Pina‐Vaz, C. (2012) · Cytometry Part A · doi:10.1002/cyto.a.21170 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Candida auris biofilm: a review on model to mechanism conservation
Khari, A., Biswas, B., Gangwar, G., Thakur, A., & Puria, R. (2023) · Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy · doi:10.1080/14787210.2023.2179036 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Hgc1 Independence of Biofilm Hyphae in Candida albicans
Sharma, A., Solis, N. V., Huang, M. Y., Lanni, F., Filler, S. G., & Mitchell, A. P. (2023) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.03498-22 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
McMahon, C. L., Esqueda, M., Yu, J.-J., Wall, G., Romo, J. A., Vila, T., Chaturvedi, A., Lopez-Ribot, J. L., Wormley, F., & Hung, C.-Y. (2023) · Journal of Fungi · doi:10.3390/jof9070722 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
High-Resolution Genome-Wide Occupancy in Candida spp. Using ChEC-seq
Tebbji, F., Khemiri, I., & Sellam, A. (2020) · mSphere · doi:10.1128/msphere.00646-20 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Wang, T. W., Sofras, D., Montelongo‐Jauregui, D., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.03.21.586120 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 2017. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts, M27. 4th ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dickwella Widanage, M. C., Singh, K., Li, J., Yarava, J. R., Scott, F. J., Xu, Y., Gow, N. A. R., Mentink-Vigier, F., Wang, P., Lamoth, F., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-61678-1 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Wor2 phenotypic switching regulator controls biofilm formation in Candida auris
Liang, W., Guan, S., Bing, J., Du, H., Zheng, Q., Tao, L., Li, B., Huang, G., & Chu, H. (2026) · npj Biofilms and Microbiomes · doi:10.1038/s41522-026-01043-2
- Authors
- Louvet, M., Li, J., Brandalise, D., Bachmann, D., Sala de Oyanguren, F., Labes, D., Jacquier, N., Genoud, C., Mucciolo, A., Coste, A. T., Sanglard, D., & Lamoth, F.
- Affiliations
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
- Flow Cytometry Facility, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- University of Lausanne (CH)
- Institute of Microbiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- ORCID
- Venue
- Microbiology Spectrum
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2024-11-05
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- e0153124-e0153124
- ISSN
- 2165-0497 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11537075
- OpenAlex
- W4402643083
- Semantic Scholar
- a54818c8e51dc6142e2255992657b429be7ef2c7
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 12
- FWCI
- 6.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Microbiology Spectrum (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- IRIS (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Swiss National Science Foundation (310030_192611)
- Fondation Santos-Suarez pour la Recherche Médicale
- Carigest
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
- Keywords
- Candida auris, Ume6, morphogenesis, biofilm formation, filamentation, cell aggregation, transcriptional regulation, virulence factors, antifungal resistance, nosocomial infections, cell wall organization, sterol biosynthesis
- MeSH terms
- Candida auris, Candidiasis, Fungal Proteins, Humans, Morphogenesis, Transcription Factors, Virulence, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Biofilms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-20.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-20.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review