Cited by 19Orthopedic Surgery and RehabilitationMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

The assessment of psychological factors on upper extremity disability: a scoping review

MacDermid, Joy C., Valdes, Kristin, Szekeres, Mike, Naughton, Nancy, Algar, Lori·2018·Journal of Hand Therapy

Abstract

Introduction The primary purpose of this scoping review was to describe the nature and extent of the published research that assesses the relationship between psychological features and patient-reported outcome following surgery or rehabilitation of upper extremity disease or injury.Methods Twenty-two included studies were examined for quantitative study design, outcome measure, inclusion/exclusion criteria, follow-up and recruitment strategy. Patient population and psychological assessment tools were examined for validity.Results Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria for this study. Only 7 of the 22 studies were longitudinal and the rest were cross sectional studies. Depression was the most common psychological status of interest and was included in 17 studies. Pain catastrophizing was the psychological status of interest in 5 of the studies. Four studies considered anxiety, 3 considered pain anxiety, 3 considered distress, 2 considered coping, 2 considered catastrophic thinking, and 2 considered fear avoidance beliefs.Discussion The majority of studies in this review were cross-sectional studies. Cross-sectional studies may not provide conclusive information about cause-and-effect relationships. This review encourages clinicians to be mindful of the psychological implications found in rehabilitation of individuals with upper extremity disease or injury along with being cognizant of choosing appropriate measurement tools that best represent each patient's characteristics and diagnoses.Conclusions The nature of the research addressing psychological factors affecting outcomes after hand injury focus on negative traits and have limited strength to suggest causation as most have used cross-sectional designs. Stronger longitudinal designs and consideration of positive traits are needed in future studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jht.2017.05.017

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychological factors such as cognitive coping strategies and psychological distress are mediators of pain intensity for given nociception.

    “Despite mounting evidence of the importance of psychological factors such as cognitive coping strategies (catastrophic thinking, fear of movement) and psychological distress (symptoms of depression and anxiety) as mediators of pain intensity for given nociception [3]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MacDermid, J. C., Valdes, K., Szekeres, M., Naughton, N., & Algar, L.
Affiliations
  • St. Joseph's Hospital (CA)
  • Gannon University (US)
Corresponding author
MacDermid, Joy C.
Venue
Journal of Hand Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
511-523
ISSN
0894-1130 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2770514217
Cited by
19
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hand Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
psychological factors, upper limb impairment, hand injuries, patient-reported outcomes, depression, pain catastrophizing, anxiety, pain-related anxiety, distress, coping, fear-avoidance beliefs, psychological assessment instruments, hand surgery, rehabilitation outcomes
MeSH terms
Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Adaptation, Psychological, Arm Injuries, Disability Evaluation, Hand Injuries, Humans, Upper Extremity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review