Cited by 42Orthopedic Surgery and RehabilitationMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationBone fractures and treatments

Psychological distress mediates the relationship between pain and disability in hand or wrist fractures

Open access
Ross, Cassie, Juraskova, Ilona, Lee, Hopin, Parkitny, Luke, Stanton, Tasha R., Moseley, G. Lorimer, McAuley, James H.·2015·The Journal of Pain

Abstract

Upper limb fracture is a common musculoskeletal injury and can lead to marked pain-related disability. Unlike other common painful musculoskeletal conditions, such as low back pain, little consideration has been given to the role that psychological variables may play in explaining the relationship between pain and disability during early fracture recovery. This cross-sectional study aimed to determine if psychological distress (symptoms of depression, anxiety, and/or stress) mediate the relationship between pain and disability in acute hand/wrist fractures. Self-reported data from a consecutive sample of 594 patients with acute hand/wrist fracture were used. Mediation analyses were conducted to determine the role of depression, anxiety, and stress in the relationship between pain and disability, controlling for relevant demographic and fracture-related variables. Depression and stress, but not anxiety, significantly mediated the relationship between pain and disability. That is, although each psychological distress variable was associated with pain (P < .001), only depression (b1 = 0.27, P = .03) and stress (b3 = .23, P = .02) were significantly associated with disability and fulfilled recommended criteria for establishing a mediating variable. Increased depression and stress, but not anxiety, explain the relationship between pain and disability and may be novel targets for interventions designed to reduce pain-related disability after upper limb fracture. Perspective: This study presents the mediating effect of psychological distress on the relationship between pain and disability in acute upper limb fracture. These factors may be novel targets for interventions designed to reduce pain-related disability after acute fracture.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.05.007

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Changes in catastrophizing and negative affect precede changes in clinical pain.

    “A number of studies using longitudinal process analyses demonstrate that changes in catastrophizing and negative affect precede changes in clinical pain 30, 318–321.”
  • The benefits of analgesic therapies may be partly explained by their effects on cognitive-emotional processes such as catastrophizing.

    “many studies have demonstrated that the benefits of analgesic therapies may be explained, in part, by their effects on cognitive emotional processes such as catastrophizing.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ross, C., Juraskova, I., Lee, H., Parkitny, L., Stanton, T. R., Moseley, G. L., & McAuley, J. H.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • University of South Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
McAuley, James H.
Venue
The Journal of Pain
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
836-843
ISSN
1526-5900 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121534797
Cited by
42
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4
FWCI
5.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1017607, 1054041, 630431)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Bone fractures and treatments
Keywords
psychological distress, hand fractures, wrist fractures, upper extremity fractures, pain-related disability, depression, anxiety, stress, mediation, fracture recovery
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Disability Evaluation, Female, Hand Injuries, Disabled Persons, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Statistics as Topic, Stress, Psychological, Wrist Injuries, Models, Statistical, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review