The DOI matches its Crossref record; 203 of the 203 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A global review on hydrological responses to forest change across multiple spatial scales: Importance of scale, climate, forest type and hydrological regime
Open accessAbstract
Despite extensive studies on hydrological responses to forest cover change in small watersheds, the hydrological responses to forest change and associated mechanisms across multiple spatial scales have not been fully understood. This review thus examined about 312 watersheds worldwide to provide a generalized framework to evaluate hydrological responses to forest cover change and to identify the contribution of spatial scale, climate, forest type and hydrological regime in determining the intensity of forest change related hydrological responses in small (<1000 km2) and large watersheds (⩾1000 km2). Key findings include: (1) the increase in annual runoff associated with forest cover loss is statistically significant at multiple spatial scales whereas the effect of forest cover gain is statistically inconsistent; (2) the sensitivity of annual runoff to forest cover change tends to attenuate as watershed size increases only in large watersheds; (3) annual runoff is more sensitive to forest cover change in water-limited watersheds than in energy-limited watersheds across all spatial scales; and (4) small mixed forest-dominated watersheds or large snow-dominated watersheds are more hydrologically resilient to forest cover change. These findings improve the understanding of hydrological response to forest cover change at different spatial scales and provide a scientific underpinning to future watershed management in the context of climate change and increasing anthropogenic disturbances.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles
Nash, J. E., & Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6 · Cited by 23,674
The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction
Beven, K., & Binley, A. (1992) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.3360060305 · Cited by 4,527
Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., de Strihou, J.-P. V. Y., & Palutikof, J. P. (2007) · Cited by 2,783
Bosch, J. M., & Hewlett, J. D. (1982) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/0022-1694(82)90117-2 · Cited by 2,567
Climate-induced variations in global wildfire danger from 1979 to 2013
Jolly, W. M., Cochrane, M. A., Freeborn, P. H., Holden, Z. A., Brown, T. J., Williamson, G. J., & Bowman, D. M. J. S. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms8537 · Cited by 2,200
Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon feedback to climate change
Kurz, W. A., Dymond, C. C., Stinson, G., Rampley, G. J., Neilson, E. T., Carroll, A. L., Ebata, T., & Safranyik, L. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06777 · Cited by 1,934
Brown, A. E., Zhang, L., McMahon, T. A., Western, A. W., & Vertessy, R. A. (2005) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.12.010 · Cited by 1,587
Consequences of widespread tree mortality triggered by drought and temperature stress
Anderegg, W. R. L., Kane, J. M., & Anderegg, L. D. L. (2013) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1635 · Cited by 1,486
Hydrological functions of tropical forests: not seeing the soil for the trees?
Bruijnzeel, L. A. (2004) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2004.01.015 · Cited by 1,454
Trading Water for Carbon with Biological Carbon Sequestration
Jackson, R. B., Jobbágy, E. G., Avissar, R., Roy, S. B., Barrett, D. J., Cook, C. W., Farley, K. A., le Maitre, D. C., McCarl, B. A., & Murray, B. C. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1119282 · Cited by 1,345
Cited by
A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures
Abbass, K., Qasim, M. Z., Song, H., Murshed, M., Mahmood, H., & Younis, I. (2022) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-022-19718-6 · Cited by 2,359
The biodiversity and ecosystem service contributions and trade-offs of forest restoration approaches
Hua, F., Bruijnzeel, L. A., Meli, P., Martin, P. A., Zhang, J., Nakagawa, S., Miao, X., Wang, W., McEvoy, C., Peña-Arancibia, J. L., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abl4649 · Cited by 831
Pathways linking biodiversity to human health: A conceptual framework
Marselle, M. R., Hartig, T., Cox, D. T. C., de Bell, S., Knapp, S., Lindley, S., Triguero-Mas, M., Böhning-Gaese, K., Braubach, M., Cook, P. A., et al. (2021) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2021.106420 · Cited by 578
Propagation of meteorological to hydrological drought for different climate regions in China
Ding, Y., Xu, J., Wang, X., Cai, H., Zhou, Z., Sun, Y., & Shi, H. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.111980 · Cited by 259
Evapotranspiration saturation amplifies climate sensitivity of terrestrial water yield
Rotenberg, E., Tatarinov, F., Muller, J. D., & Yakir, D. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-66570-6 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, M., Liu, N., Harper, R., Li, Q., Liu, K., Wei, X., Ning, D., Hou, Y., & Liu, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Hydrology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-03
- Volume
- 546
- Pages
- 44-59
- ISSN
- 0022-1694 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2565128291
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 203
- FWCI
- 15.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A global review on hydrological responses to forest change across multiple spatial scales: Importance of scale, climate, forest type and hydrological regime. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.12.040
- The paper
- Zhang, M., Liu, N., Harper, R., Li, Q., Liu, K., Wei, X., Ning, D., Hou, Y., & Liu, S. (2017). A global review on hydrological responses to forest change across multiple spatial scales: Importance of scale, climate, forest type and hydrological regime. Journal of Hydrology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.12.040
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
