Cited by 39MicroRNA in disease regulationCutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementCancer-related molecular mechanisms research

Defining the prognostic role of MicroRNAs in cutaneous melanoma

Open access
Dika, Emi, Riefolo, Mattia, Porcellini, Elisa, Broseghini, Elisabetta, Ribero, Simone, Senetta, Rebecca, Osella-Abate, Simona, Scarfì, Federica +5 more·2020·Journal of Investigative Dermatology

Abstract

Breslow thickness (BT) is the most important histopathologic factor for primary melanoma staging. BT determines the margins for wide local excision whether sentinel lymph node biopsy should be performed and subsequent melanoma staging, and patient management. The correct determination of a 0.8-mm cutoff in melanoma is important for pathologists because discrepancies leading to a change in stage can have significant clinical implications, including incorrect and/or inappropriate prognostic information, investigation, management, and follow-up. Difficulties in BT determination are mostly represented by the presence of regression or melanoma associated with a pre-existing nevus. This study aimed at investigating a molecular parameter, namely microRNA (miRNA) expression, in reference to BT assessment. Melanoma cell proliferation is influenced by miRNA dysregulation. Indeed, some miRNAs sustain and induce proliferative signals or repress growth-suppressive pathways, thereby promoting melanoma carcinogenesis. To identify the miRNAs correlating with BT, we analyzed our global miRNA expression data of 20 thin melanomas and identified two potential candidates, miR-21-5p and miR-146a-5p. We assessed the expression of these two specific miRNAs in 90 archive formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded samples of superficially spreading melanomas (SSMs) and 25 nodular melanomas from two independent cohorts and correlated the individual and combined miRNA expression with BT and other tumor characteristics. The individually normalized expression of miR-21-5p and miR-146a-5p showed a highly significant and linear correlation with BT in SSM, and their combined expression value was more strongly correlated (Pearson's r = 0.799, 95% CI = 0.71-0.86) than their individual expressions. This correlation was not significant in nodular melanoma. In SSM, we observed that the combined miRNA expression above or below 1.5 was significantly associated with overall survival and successfully identified all patients with relapsing SSM. We concluded that the combined assessment of miR-21-5p and miR-146a-5p expression in superficially spreading melanoma, in association with BT measurement, could aid pathologists in SSM staging.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jid.2020.03.949

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • miR-21-5p and miR-146a-5p exhibit a substantial correlation with Breslow thickness in superficially spreading melanoma and may enhance standard histopathologic evaluation.

    “Recent studies have highlighted the predictive significance of microRNA expression—specifically miR-21-5p and miR-146a-5p—as molecular markers that exhibit a substantial correlation with Breslow thickness in superficially spreading melanoma and may enhance standard histopathologic evaluation (8).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dika, E., Riefolo, M., Porcellini, E., Broseghini, E., Ribero, S., Senetta, R., Osella-Abate, S., Scarfì, F., Lambertini, M., Veronesi, G., Patrizi, A., Fanti, P. A., & Ferracin, M.
Affiliations
  • IRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola (IT)
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • University of Turin (IT)
Corresponding author
Dika, Emi
Venue
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
140
Issue
11
Pages
2260-2267
ISSN
0022-202X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3015584316
Cited by
39
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Investigative Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › MicroRNA in disease regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Keywords
cutaneous melanoma, Breslow thickness, microRNA expression, miR-21-5p, miR-146a, nodular melanoma, tumor staging, prognostic factors, overall survival, melanoma regression, sentinel lymph node biopsy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Melanoma, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Skin Neoplasms, MicroRNAs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review