Cited by 79Listeria monocytogenes in Food SafetyBacterial Infections and VaccinesNeonatal and Maternal Infections

Listeria monocytogenes meningitis in the Netherlands, 1985–2014: a nationwide surveillance study

Open access
Koopmans, Merel M., Bijlsma, Merijn W., Brouwer, Matthijs C., van de Beek, Diederik, van der Ende, Arie·2017·Journal of Infection

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Listeria monocytogenes can cause sepsis and meningitis. We report national surveillance data on L. monocytogenes meningitis in the Netherlands, describing incidence changes, genetic epidemiology and fatality rate. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Netherlands Reference Laboratory of Bacterial Meningitis for cases of L. monocytogenes meningitis. Strains were assessed by serotyping and bacterial population structure by multi-locus sequence typing. RESULTS: A total of 375 cases of Listeria meningitis were identified between 1985 and 2014. Peak incidence rates were observed in neonates (0.61 per 100,000 live births) and older adults (peak at 87 year; 0.53 cases per 100,000 population of the same age). Neonatal listerial meningitis decreased 17-fold from 1.95 per 100,000 live births between 1985 and 1989, to 0.11 per 100,000 live births between 2010 and 2014. Overall case fatality rate was 31%, in a multivariate analysis older age and concomitant bacteremia were associated with mortality (both p < 0.01). Clonal complexes (CC) CC1, CC2 and CC3 decreased over time from respectively 32% to 12%, 33% to 9% and 10% to 2% (all p < 0.001), while CC6 increased from 2% to 26% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of neonatal listerial meningitis has declined over the past 25 years. The genotype CC6 has become the predominant genotype in listerial meningitis in the Netherlands. Mortality of listeria meningitis has remained high.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jinf.2017.04.004

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Enterobacteriaceae such as E. coli and rarely Listeria monocytogenes, Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus agalactiae, Staphylococcus aureus are associated with mortality estimates ranging from 30% to 60%.

    “These include Enterobacteriaceae such as E. coli and rarely Listeria monocytogenes, Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus agalactiae, Staphylococcus aureus, 22 which are associated with mortality estimates ranging from 30% to 60%.7,22,23”

    From Community-acquired acute bacterial meningitis in adults: a clinical update (2019) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Results report a 31% case-fatality rate for Listeria meningitis, supporting the lower end of the stated mortality range for that pathogen. The cited passages do not establish 30%–60% mortality for the other listed organisms, and the Background’s 61% figure concerns unfavorable outcomes, not mortality. Page numbers were not supplied. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koopmans, M. M., Bijlsma, M. W., Brouwer, M. C., van de Beek, D., & van der Ende, A.
Affiliations
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Journal of Infection
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
75
Issue
1
Pages
12-19
ISSN
0163-4453 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2606594309
Cited by
79
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 1
FWCI
6.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Infection (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (279185)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Neonatal and Maternal Infections
Keywords
Listeria monocytogenes, incidence trends, neonatal listeriosis, case fatality rate, clonal complexes, genetic epidemiology, multilocus sequence typing, serotyping, bacteremia, mortality risk factors, Netherlands
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Genotype, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Listeria monocytogenes, Male, Meningitis, Listeria, Middle Aged, Mortality, Netherlands, Serotyping, Incidence, Bacteremia, Young Adult, Multilocus Sequence Typing, Epidemiological Monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review