Cited by 412Bacterial Infections and VaccinesPneumonia and Respiratory InfectionsBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing

Community-acquired bacterial meningitis in adults in the Netherlands, 2006–14: a prospective cohort study

Bijlsma, Merijn W, Brouwer, Matthijs C, Kasanmoentalib, E Soemirien, Kloek, Anne T, Lucas, Marjolein J, Tanck, Michael W, van der Ende, Arie, van de Beek, Diederik·2016·The Lancet Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Background We studied causative pathogens, clinical characteristics, and outcome of adult community-acquired bacterial meningitis after the introduction of adjunctive dexamethasone treatment and nationwide implementation of paediatric conjugate vaccines. Methods In this cohort study, we prospectively assessed adults (age >16 years) with community-acquired bacterial meningitis in the Netherlands, identified through the National Reference Laboratory for Bacterial Meningitis or individual physicians between Jan 1, 2006, and July 1, 2014. We identified independent predictors of an unfavourable outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale score 1-4) by logistic regression. Findings We assessed 1412 episodes of community-acquired bacterial meningitis. Incidence declined from 1·72 cases per 100,000 adults per year in 2007-08, to 0·94 per 100,000 per year in 2013-14. Streptococcus pneumoniae caused 1017 (72%) of 1412 episodes. Rates of adult bacterial meningitis decreased most sharply among pneumococcal serotypes included in paediatric conjugate vaccine, and in meningococcal meningitis. We found no evidence of serotype or serogroup replacement. The overall case fatality rate was 244 (17%) of 1412 episodes and unfavourable outcome occurred in 531 (38%) of 1412 episodes. Predictors of unfavourable outcome were advanced age, absence of otitis or sinusitis, alcoholism, tachycardia, lower score on the Glasgow Coma Scale, cranial nerve palsy, a cerebrospinal fluid white-cell count lower than 1000 cells per μL, a positive blood culture, and a high serum C-reactive protein concentration. Adjunctive dexamethasone was administered for 1234 (89%) of 1384 assessed episodes. The multivariable adjusted odds ratio of dexamethasone treatment for unfavourable outcome was 0·54 (95% CI 0·39-0·73). Interpretation The incidence of adult bacterial meningitis has decreased substantially, which is partly explained by herd protection by paediatric conjugate vaccines. Adjunctive dexamethasone treatment was associated with substantially improved outcome. Funding European Research Council, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, European Union, Academic Medical Center, and Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1473-3099(15)00430-2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Glasgow Outcome Scale used to assess outcome was developed to evaluate recovery after brain injury and is not validated for CNS infections.

    “The GOS used to assess the outcome in the present study was developed to evaluate recovery after brain injury35 and is—although frequently used16,17,36—not validated for CNS infections.”
  • Potential prognostic factors and their classifications were prespecified and based on general knowledge and previous research.

    “Potential prognostic factors and their classifications were prespecified and based on general knowledge and previous research,16,17”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bijlsma, M. W., Brouwer, M. C., Kasanmoentalib, E. S., Kloek, A. T., Lucas, M. J., Tanck, M. W., van der Ende, A., & van de Beek, D.
Affiliations
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
339-347
ISSN
1473-3099 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2184687076
Cited by
412
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 1
FWCI
25.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Research Council (Grant #281156)
  • National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, the European Union's seventh framework program (#279185, EUCLIDS)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Keywords
community-acquired bacterial meningitis, adults, Streptococcus pneumoniae, pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, herd protection, meningococcal meningitis, case fatality, prognostic factors, incidence trends, serotype replacement, C-reactive protein, alcoholism, otitis media, sinusitis, cranial nerve palsy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Bacteria, Dexamethasone, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Incidence, Odds Ratio, Treatment Outcome, Meningitis, Bacterial, Community-Acquired Infections, Young Adult, Serogroup

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review