Interdependent preferential trade agreement memberships: An empirical analysis
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The profession has struggled to address endogeneity using standard techniques (e.g., IV treatment) because what determines the probability to sign a trade agreement also affects the volume of trade flows.
“the profession has struggled to address this issue using standard techniques (e.g., instrumental variable (IV) treatment) due to the fact that very often what determines the probability to sign a trade agreement also affects the volume of trade flows (Egger et al., 2008;Egger et al., 2011;Helpman et al., 2008;Jochmans & Verardi, 2022).”
From Estimating the effects of trade agreements: Lessons from 60 years of methods and data (2024) · cites this paper as Egger et al., 2008
Endogeneity has been a major obstacle in gravity models.
“Endogeneity has been a major obstacle in gravity models.”
From Estimating the effects of trade agreements: Lessons from 60 years of methods and data (2024) · cites this paper as Egger et al., 2008
Cites
The Long and Short of the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement
Trefler, D. (2004) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/0002828042002633 · Cited by 1,071 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Carbon tariffs: An analysis of the trade, welfare, and emission effects
Larch, M., & Wanner, J. (2017) · Journal of International Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2017.09.003 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Self-citationEstimating the effects of trade agreements: Lessons from 60 years of methods and data
Larch, M., & Yotov, Y. V. (2024) · The World Economy · doi:10.1111/twec.13569 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantifying the partial and general equilibrium effects of sanctions on Russia
Flach, L., Heiland, I., Larch, M., Steininger, M., & Teti, F. A. (2024) · Review of International Economics · doi:10.1111/roie.12707 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationDo Japan’s Free Trade Agreements Increase Its International Trade?
Ando, M., Urata, S., & Yamanouchi, K. (2022) · Journal of Economic Integration · doi:10.11130/jei.2022.37.1.1 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“Meanwhile, the information on the trade policies is obtained from the Mario Larch Regional Trade Agreements Database, constructed by Egger and Larch (2008).12) 11) The gap of 25% is estimated, based on our trade data for country-pairs that have both fob and cif values.”
Method
- Authors
- Egger, P., & Larch, M.
- Affiliations
- Ifo Institute for Economic Research (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Egger, Peter
- Venue
- Journal of International Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 384-399
- ISSN
- 0022-1996 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1999294484
- Cited by
- 505
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 33 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 34.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of International Economics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- ERef Bayreuth (University of Bayreuth) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations in Latin America
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Political and Economic Relations
- Keywords
- preferential trade agreements, bilateral trade agreements, trade agreement formation, domino effect, geographic distance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
