The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Current status and perspectives of fungal entomopathogens used for microbial control of arthropod pests in Brazil
Open accessAbstract
Entomopathogenic fungi play a central role in Brazil's biopesticide market. Approximately 50% of registered microbial biopesticides comprise mycoinsecticides and/or mycoacaricides consisting of hypocrealean fungi, with most based on Metarhizium anisopliae sensu stricto (s. str.) and Beauveria bassiana s. str. These fungi are mainly used to control spittlebugs in sugarcane fields and whiteflies in row crops, respectively, with annual applications surpassing three million hectares. Research also emphasizes the potential of fungal entomopathogens to manage arthropod vectors of human diseases. Most registered fungal formulations comprise wettable powders or technical (non-formulated) products, with relatively few new developments in formulation technology. Despite the large area treated with mycoinsecticides (i.e., approx. 2 million ha of sugarcane treated with M. anisopliae and 1.5 million ha of soybean treated with B. bassiana), their market share remains small compared with the chemical insecticide market. Nevertheless, several major agricultural companies are investing in fungus-based products with the aim at achieving more sustainable IPM programs for major pests in both organic and conventional crops. Government and private research groups are pursuing innovative technologies for mass production, formulation, product stability and quality control, which will support cost-effective commercial mycoinsecticides. Here, we summarize the status of mycoinsecticides currently available in Brazil and discuss future prospects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Faria, M. R. D., & Wraight, S. P. (2007) · Biological Control · doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.08.001 · Cited by 1,503
Self-citationBiological control using invertebrates and microorganisms: plenty of new opportunities
van Lenteren, J. C., Bolckmans, K., Köhl, J., Ravensberg, W. J., & Urbaneja, A. (2018) · BioControl · doi:10.1007/s10526-017-9801-4 · Cited by 1,034
ASSESSMENT OF THE APPLICATION OF BACULOVIRUSES FOR CONTROL OF LEPIDOPTERA
Moscardi, F. (1999) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.44.1.257 · Cited by 905
The production and uses of Beauveria bassiana as a microbial insecticide
Mascarin, G. M., & Jaronski, S. T. (2016) · World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s11274-016-2131-3 · Cited by 503
Self-citationDistribuição espacial do uso de agrotóxicos no Brasil: uma ferramenta para a Vigilância em Saúde
Pignati, W. A., Lima, F. A. N. D. S. E., Lara, S. S. D., Correa, M. L. M., Barbosa, J. R., Leão, L. H. D. C., & Pignatti, M. G. (2017) · Ciência & Saúde Coletiva · doi:10.1590/1413-812320172210.17742017 · Cited by 411
Patterns of land use, extensification, and intensification of Brazilian agriculture
Dias, L. C. P., Pimenta, F. M., Santos, A. B., Costa, M. H., & Ladle, R. J. (2016) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13314 · Cited by 321
Biological Control in Brazil: an overview
Parra, J. R. P. (2014) · Scientia Agricola · doi:10.1590/0103-9016-2014-0167 · Cited by 234
Quality Control of Fungal and Viral Biocontrol Agents - Assurance of Product Performance
Jenkins, N. E., & Grzywacz, D. (2000) · Biocontrol Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/09583150020011717 · Cited by 142
Mascarin, G. M., Kobori, N. N., Quintela, E. D., & Delalibera, Í. (2013) · Biological Control · doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2013.05.001 · Cited by 133
Self-citationPhylogenetic diversity of Brazilian Metarhizium associated with sugarcane agriculture
Rezende, J. M., Botelho, A. B. R. Z., Lopes, M. D. S., Delalibera, Í., & Rehner, S. A. (2015) · BioControl · doi:10.1007/s10526-015-9656-5 · Cited by 98
Self-citation
Cited by
Hernández-Fernández, M., Cordero-Bueso, G., Ruiz-Muñoz, M., & Cantoral, J. M. (2021) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants10050822 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Mascarin, G. M., Lopes, R. B., Delalibera, Í., Fernandes, É. K. K., Luz, C., & Faria, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Invertebrate Pathology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-07
- Volume
- 165
- Pages
- 46-53
- ISSN
- 0022-2011 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2784238356
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 18.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current status and perspectives of fungal entomopathogens used for microbial control of arthropod pests in Brazil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jip.2018.01.001
- The paper
- Mascarin, G. M., Lopes, R. B., Delalibera, Í., Fernandes, É. K. K., Luz, C., & Faria, M. (2019). Current status and perspectives of fungal entomopathogens used for microbial control of arthropod pests in Brazil. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2018.01.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.