The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Explainable Machine Learning Framework for Intrusion Detection Systems
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, machine learning-based intrusion detection systems (IDSs) have proven to be effective; especially, deep neural networks improve the detection rates of intrusion detection models. However, as models become more and more complex, people can hardly get the explanations behind their decisions. At the same time, most of the works about model interpretation focuses on other fields like computer vision, natural language processing, and biology. This leads to the fact that in practical use, cybersecurity experts can hardly optimize their decisions according to the judgments of the model. To solve these issues, a framework is proposed in this paper to give an explanation for IDSs. This framework uses SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), and combines local and global explanations to improve the interpretation of IDSs. The local explanations give the reasons why the model makes certain decisions on the specific input. The global explanations give the important features extracted from IDSs, present the relationships between the feature values and different types of attacks. At the same time, the interpretations between two different classifiers, one-vs-all classifier and multiclass classifier, are compared. NSL-KDD dataset is used to test the feasibility of the framework. The framework proposed in this paper leads to improve the transparency of any IDS, and helps the cybersecurity staff have a better understanding of IDSs' judgments. Furthermore, the different interpretations between different kinds of classifiers can also help security experts better design the structures of the IDSs. More importantly, this work is unique in the intrusion detection field, presenting the first use of the SHAP method to give explanations for IDSs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions
Lundberg, S., & Lee, S.-I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.07874 · Cited by 23,707
"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier
Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939778 · Cited by 17,555
Gauriat, C.-M., Pencolé, Y., Ribot, P., & Brouillet, G. (2024) · HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · doi:10.4230/oasics.dx.2024.27 · Cited by 12,586
(2017) · Cited by 11,625
17. A Value for n-Person Games
Shapley, L. S. (1953) · Contributions to the Theory of Games (AM-28), Volume II · doi:10.1515/9781400881970-018 · Cited by 6,950
A detailed analysis of the KDD CUP 99 data set
Tavallaee, M., Bagheri, E., Lu, W., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Security and Defense Applications · doi:10.1109/cisda.2009.5356528 · Cited by 5,396
Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps
Simonyan, K., Vedaldi, A., & Zisserman, A. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.6034 · Cited by 5,370
On Pixel-Wise Explanations for Non-Linear Classifier Decisions by Layer-Wise Relevance Propagation
Bach, S., Binder, A., Montavon, G., Klauschen, F., Müller, K.-R., & Samek, W. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0130140 · Cited by 4,524
A Survey of Data Mining and Machine Learning Methods for Cyber Security Intrusion Detection
Buczak, A. L., & Guven, E. (2016) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2015.2494502 · Cited by 3,332
Cited by
Explainable Artificial Intelligence in CyberSecurity: A Survey
Capuano, N., Fenza, G., Loia, V., & Stanzione, C. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3204171 · Cited by 330
Le, T.-T.-H., Kim, H., Kang, H., & Kim, H. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22031154 · Cited by 208
Explainable artificial intelligence for cybersecurity: a literature survey
Charmet, F., Tanuwidjaja, H. C., Ayoubi, S., Gimenez, P.-F., Han, Y., Jmila, H., Blanc, G., Takahashi, T., & Zhang, Z. (2022) · Annals of Telecommunications · doi:10.1007/s12243-022-00926-7 · Cited by 167
A survey on explainable artificial intelligence for cybersecurity
Rjoub, G., Bentahar, J., Abdel Wahab, O., Mizouni, R., Song, A., Cohen, R., Otrok, H., & Mourad, A. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2023.3282740 · Cited by 158
Robust Network Intrusion Detection Through Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Barnard, P., Marchetti, N., & DaSilva, L. A. (2022) · IEEE Networking Letters · doi:10.1109/lnet.2022.3186589 · Cited by 145
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, M., Zheng, K., Yang, Y., & Wang, X.
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 73127-73141
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3017093935
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 18.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Explainable Machine Learning Framework for Intrusion Detection Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2020.2988359
- The paper
- Wang, M., Zheng, K., Yang, Y., & Wang, X. (2020). An Explainable Machine Learning Framework for Intrusion Detection Systems. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2988359
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.