Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 355

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Explainable Machine Learning Framework for Intrusion Detection Systems

Open access
Wang, Maonan, Zheng, Kangfeng, Yang, Yanqing, Wang, Xiujuan·2020·IEEE Access

Abstract

In recent years, machine learning-based intrusion detection systems (IDSs) have proven to be effective; especially, deep neural networks improve the detection rates of intrusion detection models. However, as models become more and more complex, people can hardly get the explanations behind their decisions. At the same time, most of the works about model interpretation focuses on other fields like computer vision, natural language processing, and biology. This leads to the fact that in practical use, cybersecurity experts can hardly optimize their decisions according to the judgments of the model. To solve these issues, a framework is proposed in this paper to give an explanation for IDSs. This framework uses SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), and combines local and global explanations to improve the interpretation of IDSs. The local explanations give the reasons why the model makes certain decisions on the specific input. The global explanations give the important features extracted from IDSs, present the relationships between the feature values and different types of attacks. At the same time, the interpretations between two different classifiers, one-vs-all classifier and multiclass classifier, are compared. NSL-KDD dataset is used to test the feasibility of the framework. The framework proposed in this paper leads to improve the transparency of any IDS, and helps the cybersecurity staff have a better understanding of IDSs' judgments. Furthermore, the different interpretations between different kinds of classifiers can also help security experts better design the structures of the IDSs. More importantly, this work is unique in the intrusion detection field, presenting the first use of the SHAP method to give explanations for IDSs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2020.2988359

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Cited by

See all 355

Metadata

Authors
Wang, M., Zheng, K., Yang, Y., & Wang, X.
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2020
Volume
8
Pages
73127-73141
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3017093935
Cited by
355
References
53
FWCI
18.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Explainable Machine Learning Framework for Intrusion Detection Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/access.2020.2988359
The paper
Wang, M., Zheng, K., Yang, Y., & Wang, X. (2020). An Explainable Machine Learning Framework for Intrusion Detection Systems. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2988359

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.