The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk analysis for oil & gas pipelines: A sustainability assessment approach using fuzzy based bow-tie analysis
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zadeh, L. A. (1965) · Information and Control · doi:10.1016/s0019-9958(65)90241-x · Cited by 67,855
Zadeh, L. A. (1996) · Cited by 46,844
The Analytic Hierarchy Process
SAATY, T. L., & KEARNS, K. P. (1985) · Analytical Planning · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-032599-6.50008-8 · Cited by 15,357
Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Applications
Klir, G. J., & Yuan, B. (1995) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 6,240
On the quantitative definition of risk
Kaplan, S., & Garrick, B. J. (1981) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1981.tb01350.x · Cited by 3,103
Application of Fuzzy Logic to Approximate Reasoning Using Linguistic Synthesis
Mamdani (1977) · IEEE Transactions on Computers · doi:10.1109/tc.1977.1674779 · Cited by 2,137
On the simultaneous associativity ofF(x, y) andx+y−F(x, y)
Frank, M. J. (1979) · Aequationes Mathematicae · doi:10.1007/bf02189866 · Cited by 1,116
Combination of Evidence in Dempster-Shafer Theory
SENTZ, K., & FERSON, S. (2002) · doi:10.2172/800792 · Cited by 1,093
Identification and Review of Sensitivity Analysis Methods
Christopher Frey, H., & Patil, S. R. (2002) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/0272-4332.00039 · Cited by 1,036
Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis
Grossel, S. S. (2001) · Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries · doi:10.1016/s0950-4230(01)00002-x · Cited by 665
Cited by
A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for infrastructure management
Kabir, G., Sadiq, R., & Tesfamariam, S. (2014) · Structure and Infrastructure Engineering · doi:10.1080/15732479.2013.795978 · Cited by 437
Self-citationKammouh, O., Gardoni, P., & Cimellaro, G. P. (2020) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2020.106813 · Cited by 323
Temper, L., Avila, S., Bene, D. D., Gobby, J., Kosoy, N., Billon, P. L., Martinez-Alier, J., Perkins, P., Roy, B., Scheidel, A., et al. (2020) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abc197 · Cited by 320
Hassan, S., Wang, J., Kontovas, C., & Bashir, M. (2022) · Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries · doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104616 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Shahriar, A., Sadiq, R., & Tesfamariam, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-05
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 505-523
- ISSN
- 0950-4230 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2064072957
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 5.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk analysis for oil & gas pipelines: A sustainability assessment approach using fuzzy based bow-tie analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jlp.2011.12.007
- The paper
- Shahriar, A., Sadiq, R., & Tesfamariam, S. (2012). Risk analysis for oil & gas pipelines: A sustainability assessment approach using fuzzy based bow-tie analysis. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2011.12.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
