CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 46Advanced machining processes and optimizationEngineering Technology and MethodologiesAdvanced Machining and Optimization Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Influence of flute number and stepped bit geometry when drilling CFRP/Ti6Al4V stacks

Open access
Alonso, Unai, Calamaz, Madalina, Girot, Franck, Iriondo, Edurne·2019·Journal of Manufacturing Processes
DOI 10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.02.006
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.02.006

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lower deviation from dimensional accuracy values were obtained for both CFRP and Ti6Al4V components at low feed rate drilling of CFRP/Ti6Al4V mixed metallic stack.

    “Again, a lower deviation from dimensional accuracy values was obtained for both CFRP, and Ti6Al4V components at low feed rate drilling of CFRP/Ti6Al4V mixed metallic stack [7, 8, 10, 17, 18, 20, 21, 24, 42].”

    From Evaluation and multi-criteria optimization of surface roughness, deviation from dimensional accuracy and roundness error in drilling CFRP/Ti6Al4 stacks (2022) · cites this paper as [24]

    Section 2.3 (page not provided) says lower feeds are advantageous for CFRP and moderate feeds can give good results in both materials, but it also says higher feeds improve titanium hole quality. Section 3.3.1 (page not provided) measures hole diameters in both layers and discusses variation by drill geometry and hole number; it does not establish that low feed rates reduced dimensional deviation in both layers. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • These results show parallelism with the results of studies on similar materials in the literature.

    “These re-sults show parallelism with the results of studies on si-milar materials in the literature [8, 10, 13, 18, 24, 39, 40].”

    From Evaluation and multi-criteria optimization of surface roughness, deviation from dimensional accuracy and roundness error in drilling CFRP/Ti6Al4 stacks (2022) · cites this paper as [24]

  • Unlike the CFRP layers, the average surface roughness values of the Ti layer remain relatively more consistent.

    “On the other hand, unlike the CFRP layers, the average surface roughness values of the Ti layer remain relatively more consistent [8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 39, 40].”

    From Evaluation and multi-criteria optimization of surface roughness, deviation from dimensional accuracy and roundness error in drilling CFRP/Ti6Al4 stacks (2022) · cites this paper as [24]

    Section 3.3 says the paper compares surface roughness, but the passages retrieved for 'average surface roughness' and related terms give no roughness values or comparison of their consistency in CFRP and Ti. Section 3.3.1 discusses hole diameter instead, which cannot establish the claimed roughness pattern. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Lower roundness error values were obtained at the lowest cutting speed when drilling through the metallic stack in one go.

    “Lower roundness error values were obtained at the lowest cutting speed when drilling through the metallic stack in one go [7, 8, 10, 17, 18, 20, 21, 24, 42].”

    From Evaluation and multi-criteria optimization of surface roughness, deviation from dimensional accuracy and roundness error in drilling CFRP/Ti6Al4 stacks (2022) · cites this paper as [24]

    Section 2.3, Table 4 lists the same cutting speed (15 m/min) for all tested drill geometries, so it provides no lowest-speed comparison. Section 3.3 describes hole diameter, surface roughness, burrs and delamination, but the searched passages on roundness and circularity do not report the claimed roundness-error result for drilling the stack in one go. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Alonso, U., Calamaz, M., Girot, F., & Iriondo, E.
Affiliations
  • University of the Basque Country (ES)
  • Arts et Métiers (FR)
  • Ikerbasque (ES)
Corresponding author
Alonso, Unai
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Manufacturing Processes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
39
Pages
356-370
ISSN
1526-6125 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.02.006
OpenAlex
W2921308785
Cited by
46
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3
FWCI
4.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Manufacturing Processes (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • SAM, the Arts et Métiers ParisTech open access repository (Paris Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Oskar-Bordeaux (Universite de Bordeaux) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
  • Université de Bordeaux
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced machining processes and optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Engineering Technology and Methodologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques
Keywords
drilling, tool geometry, cutting edge wear, cutting force, hole damage, carbon fiber reinforced polymer, titanium alloys

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review