The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the interpretation of drilling CFRP/Ti6Al4V stacks using the orthogonal cutting method: Chip removal mode and subsurface damage formation
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Unlike the CFRP layers, the average surface roughness values of the Ti layer remain relatively more consistent.
“On the other hand, unlike the CFRP layers, the average surface roughness values of the Ti layer remain relatively more consistent [8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 39, 40].”
From Evaluation and multi-criteria optimization of surface roughness, deviation from dimensional accuracy and roundness error in drilling CFRP/Ti6Al4 stacks (2022) · cites this paper as [40]
Section 3.3.3 (page unavailable) says Ti hole surfaces are smoother than CFRP surfaces, which supports the comparison in general. It does not report average roughness values or establish that Ti roughness remains more consistent; it also says higher feed rates intensify marks and grooves on Ti surfaces. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThese results show parallelism with the results of studies on similar materials in the literature.
“These re-sults show parallelism with the results of studies on si-milar materials in the literature [8, 10, 13, 18, 24, 39, 40].”
From Evaluation and multi-criteria optimization of surface roughness, deviation from dimensional accuracy and roundness error in drilling CFRP/Ti6Al4 stacks (2022) · cites this paper as [40]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Orthogonal cutting mechanisms of graphite/epoxy composite. Part I: unidirectional laminate
Wang, D. H., RAMULU, M., & Arola, D. D. (1995) · International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture · doi:10.1016/0890-6955(95)00014-o · Cited by 327
A study on the drilling of composite and titanium stacks
RAMULU, M., Branson, T., & Kim, D. (2001) · Composite Structures · doi:10.1016/s0263-8223(01)00071-x · Cited by 322
Orthogonal cutting mechanisms of graphite/epoxy composite. Part II: multi-directional laminate
Wang, D. H., RAMULU, M., & Arola, D. D. (1995) · International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture · doi:10.1016/0890-6955(95)00015-p · Cited by 293
Drilling of composites and resulting surface integrity
Brinksmeier, E., Fangmann, S., & Rentsch, R. (2011) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2011.03.077 · Cited by 249
Recent advances in drilling hybrid FRP/Ti composite: A state-of-the-art review
Xu, J., Mkaddem, A., & Mansori, M. E. (2015) · Composite Structures · doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.028 · Cited by 246
Self-citationTool wear in drilling of composite/titanium stacks using carbide and polycrystalline diamond tools
Park, K.-H., Beal, A., Kim, D., et al. (2011) · Wear · doi:10.1016/j.wear.2011.05.038 · Cited by 240
Ezugwu, E. O., Bonney, J., da Silva, R. B., et al. (2006) · International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture · doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.08.005 · Cited by 218
Experimental study on drilling mechanisms and strategies of hybrid CFRP/Ti stacks
Xu, J., & El Mansori, M. (2016) · Composite Structures · doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.07.025 · Cited by 162
Self-citationIsbilir, O., & Ghassemieh, E. (2013) · Machining Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10910344.2013.806098 · Cited by 107
Ultrasonically assisted drilling of carbon fibre reinforced plastics and Ti6Al4V
Sandá, A., Arriola, I., Navas, V. G., et al. (2016) · Journal of Manufacturing Processes · doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.03.003 · Cited by 107
Preliminary study on rotary ultrasonic machining of CFRP/Ti stacks
Cong, W., Pei, Z. J., & Treadwell, C. (2014) · Ultrasonics · doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2014.03.012 · Cited by 83
Kim, D., Beal, A., & Kwon, P. Y. (2015) · Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.4031052 · Cited by 79
A comparison between wet and cryogenic drilling of CFRP/Ti stacks
Impero, F., Dix, M., Squillace, A., et al. (2018) · Materials and Manufacturing Processes · doi:10.1080/10426914.2018.1453162 · Cited by 76
Meena, A., & Mansori, M. E. (2011) · Wear · doi:10.1016/j.wear.2010.12.022 · Cited by 74
Wear characteristics of polycrystalline diamond tools in orthogonal cutting of CFRP/Ti stacks
Xu, J., & Mansori, M. E. (2017) · Wear · doi:10.1016/j.wear.2016.11.038 · Cited by 57
Self-citationLi, M., Soo, S. L., Aspinwall, D. K., et al. (2014) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2014.04.068 · Cited by 40
Experimental Studies on the Cutting Characteristics of Hybrid CFRP/Ti Stacks
Xu, J., & Mansori, M. E. (2016) · Procedia Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2016.08.024 · Cited by 30
Self-citationTribological behaviour of TiAlN coated carbides in dry sliding tests
Grzesik, W., Zalisz, Z., & Król, S. (2006) · Cited by 20
Study on drilling of CFRP/Ti6Al4V stack with modified twist drills using acoustic emission technique
Prabukarthi, A., Senthilkumar, M., & Krishnaraj, V. (2016) · Steel and Composite Structures · doi:10.12989/scs.2016.21.3.573 · Cited by 8
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An, Q., Dang, J., Li, J., Wang, C., & Chen, M. (2020) · Composite Structures · doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112794 · Cited by 95
Self-citationInvestigation of minimum quantity lubrication effects in drilling CFRP/Ti6Al4V stacks
Xu, J., Ji, M., Chen, M., & Ren, F. (2019) · Materials and Manufacturing Processes · doi:10.1080/10426914.2019.1661431 · Cited by 73
Self-citationXu, J., Ji, M., Chen, M., & El Mansori, M. (2020) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-020-05742-8 · Cited by 63
Self-citationA mechanistic prediction model for thrust force and torque during drilling of CFRP/Ti stacks
Jia, Z.-Y., Zhang, C., Wang, F.-J., & Fu, R. (2020) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-019-04861-1 · Cited by 24
Motorcu, A., & Ekici, E. (2022) · FME Transactions · doi:10.5937/fme2203441m · Cited by 12
“On the other hand, unlike the CFRP layers, the average surface roughness values of the Ti layer remain relatively more consistent [8, 10, 12, 18, 24, 39, 40].”
BackgroundResult
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, J., El Mansori, M., Voisin, J., Chen, M., & Ren, F.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- Arts et Métiers (FR)
- Southern Medical University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Xu, Jinyang
- Venue
- Journal of Manufacturing Processes
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-08
- Volume
- 44
- Pages
- 435-447
- ISSN
- 1526-6125 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2966386757
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 4.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Manufacturing Processes (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- SAM, the Arts et Métiers ParisTech open access repository (Paris Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced machining processes and optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Engineering Technology and Methodologies
- Keywords
- orthogonal cutting, subsurface damage, cutting force, hole morphology, machinability, carbon fiber reinforced polymer, titanium alloys
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
